fonts-bugs September 2009

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

17 participants
523 discussions

[Bug 503430] New: Incorrect Kerning in some applications
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Aug '10

02 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Incorrect Kerning in some applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503430 Summary: Incorrect Kerning in some applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: grom358_spamkill(a)yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The kerning is incorrect in some applications. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install the Microsoft Corefonts for comparions (corefonts.sf.net) 2. Load Abiword and type "Test AV fi" on first and second line. Set first line to Arial and second line to Liberation Sans. 3. Repeat step 2 in Openoffice Actual results: The kerning is incorrect in Openoffice Expected results: The kerning should match in Openoffice Additional info: The same problems occurs when using the Liberation fonts with Apache FOP (http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 35

[Bug 508899] New: Monospace no more
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Aug '10

02 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Monospace no more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508899 Summary: Monospace no more Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: yaneti(a)declera.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=349951) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349951) buggy monospace Description of problem: The new liberaion-mono font from liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090630-1.fc12 , no longer appears monospaced in verious applications (firefox, gedit). Attached a composite of the new and old monospaced font rendering of the same thing in gedit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 43

[Bug 512504] New: syntaxError: invalid syntax File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py", line 397 as = p.getAssembly()
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jul '10

29 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: syntaxError: invalid syntax File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py", line 397 as = p.getAssembly() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512504 Summary: syntaxError: invalid syntax File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTool s/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py", line 397 as = p.getAssembly() Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonttools AssignedTo: roozbeh(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: While building latest heuristica snapshot rm Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx rm: cannot remove `Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx': No such file or directory ttx Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttf make: [Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx] Error 1 (ignored) Dumping "Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttf" to "Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx"... Dumping 'GlyphOrder' table... Dumping 'head' table... Dumping 'hhea' table... Dumping 'maxp' table... Dumping 'OS/2' table... Dumping 'hmtx' table... Dumping 'cmap' table... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/ttx", line 11, in <module> ttx.main(sys.argv[1:]) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line 288, in main process(jobs, options) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line 273, in process action(input, output, options) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttx.py", line 170, in ttDump disassembleInstructions=options.disassembleInstructions) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py", line 267, in saveXML self._tableToXML(tableWriter, tag, progress) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py", line 282, in _tableToXML table = self[tag] File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py", line 366, in __getitem__ tableClass = getTableClass(tag) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py", line 774, in getTableClass module = getTableModule(tag) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/__init__.py", line 763, in getTableModule __import__("fontTools.ttLib.tables." + pyTag) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/_f_p_g_m.py", line 3, in <module> import ttProgram File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/ttLib/tables/ttProgram.py", line 397 as = p.getAssembly() ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax make: *** [Heuristica-Regular.gen.ttx] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonttools x86_64 2.2-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 510174] New: Version Info is not updated.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '10

27 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Version Info is not updated. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510174 Summary: Version Info is not updated. Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends on: 503430 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Version is not 1.02. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-1.05.1.20090706 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install the font. 2. Open the fonts in /usr/share/fonts/liberation/* with fontforge. 3. Check with font info. Actual results: 1.02 Expected results: 1.05.1.20090706 or 1.05.1 or 1.05. Additional info: N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 466029] New: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466029 Summary: fonts.dir refers to non-existent .bdf files, breaking accesses Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-KOI8-R AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: goeran(a)uddeborg.se QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The file /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/misc/fonts.dir contains two entries for each font, one for the pcf.gz file and one for a bdf file that isn't included in the package. Apparently, the presence of the bdf entry breaks accesses to these fonts. As an example, it contains: 9x15s.bdf -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-90-koi8-ub 9x15s.pcf.gz -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-90-koi8-ub Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-10.fc8.noarch How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install fonts-KOI8-R 2. xfd -fn 9x15 Actual results: Warning: Cannot convert string "9x15" to type FontStruct xfd: no font to display Expected results: A window with the font displayed. Additional info: The bug can be avoided by rerunning mkfontdir in /usr/share/fonts/KOI8-R/misc. (And trigger the X server to reread its font files.) But there is no RPM script or other automatic way this is done. It must be done "by hand" after installation by the system administrator. And after doing this, the package fails a verify check by RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 22579] New: OO.o devs think DejaVu kerning is broken for windows apps
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22579 Summary: OO.o devs think DejaVu kerning is broken for windows apps Product: DejaVu Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: General AssignedTo: dejavu-bugs(a)lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102911 « Every windows application that relies on the GDI call GetKerningPairs() will fail with these problematic fonts. On the other hand the font's kern table is valid and OOo is right that it trusts GDI to provide the kerning pairs. There are four ways to fix it: 1. fix Windows so that GetKerningPairs() ignores pairs it cannot handle 2. remove the problematic kernings from the DejaVu Serif fonts 3. make sure that every glyph mentioned in the kern table has a (proper or dummy) unicode inside the baseplane 4. make OOo and all other Windows applications avoid GDI calls and parse all font tables themselves » -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 497090] New: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497090 Summary: [bn][bn-IN][as] Invalid addition of Yaphala conjuncts are being rendered Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: runab(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In case of conjuncts with Yaphala (U09CD+U09AF), multiple Yaphala signs can be typed consecutively giving rise to invalid conjunct combinations. e.g ক্য্য্য্য (ক+্+য+্+য+্+য+্+য) This error could be replicated in gedit, kwrite and Openoffice.org Writer Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-indic: 2.3.8-1.fc11 gedit : 2.26.1-1.fc11 openoffice.org: 3.1.0-9.2.fc11 kdebase : 4.2.2-2.fc11 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit 2. Type in the following unicode values (for the above example) : U0995+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF+U09CD+U09AF Actual results: The last 3 U09CD+U09AF pairs are allowed as part of the conjunct Expected results: The U09CD+U09AF pair should not be allowed to be rendered after another U09CD+U09AF. i.e. only one U09CD+U09AF pair can be used when combining with another consonant to form a conjunct. Additional info: Please do note that: U09AF+U09CD+U09AF is a valid conjunct combination, where two U09AF characters combine to form a conjunct (য্য) Screenshots: gedit: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/gedit-ya.png kwrite: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/kwrite-ya.png oowrite: http://runab.fedorapeople.org/assorted-bugs/oowrite-ya.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 497768] New: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

1 5

[Bug 517783] New: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517783 Summary: [mai_IN] font-match is showing different fonts than language Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends on: 497768 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 497768 Bug Clone for Rawhide with following version: --------- fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc12 lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.0-2.fc12 -------- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #497768 +++ Description of problem: Machine with Rawhide, having Maithili(mai_IN) language only, while checking font for language, it is showing "Lohit Hindi", while maithili fonts are installed on machine. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11.i586 lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. in gnome-terminal run, 2. $fc-match 3. Actual results: [aalam@333-333 ~]$ echo $LANG mai_IN [aalam@333-333 ~]$ fc-match lohit_hi.ttf: "Lohit Hindi" "Regular" Expected results: "Lohit Maithili" Additional info: --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2009-06-09 10:37:57 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from psatpute(a)redhat.com on 2009-08-16 23:42:57 EDT --- *** Bug 517635 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 477331] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: asana-math-fonts AssignedTo: jonstanley(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jonstanley(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora After more than a month of consultation, feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved by FESCO. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Package maintainers must now convert their packages in rawhide to the new templates. The following packages have already been converted in rawhide and can serve as examples if the templates published in the fontpackages-devel package are not clear enough: ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts FPC and FESCO were not consulted on splitting or renaming packages, nevertheless the new templates make it fare easier to manage subpackages, so you're strongly encouraged to split your packages along font family lines. A mandatory rule about splitting will probably be submitted for approval before the F11 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
53
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs September 2009