[Bug 477389] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: ghostscript-fonts
AssignedTo: twaugh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: twaugh(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Bug 527740] New: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527740
Summary: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct
followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of
the chillu also
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
smc-discuss(a)googlegroups.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=363982)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363982)
Screenshot for chillu conjuncts
Description of problem:
When chillu conjuncts are followed by any punctuation marks like "!", ".", ",",
"'", "?" or SPACE, ie when a word ends with a chillu conjunct, and followed by
a punctuation mark or a SPACE, using Backspace to delete the punctuation mark
or SPACE results in the deletion of chillu conjunct together with the
punctuation mark/SPACE.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango 1.26.0-1.fc12 i686
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open gedit
2. type any of chillu conjunct, eg: 0D28, 0D4D, 200D
OR
type a word ending with chillu conjunct, eg: 0D05, 0D35, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D
3. type any punctuation marks like "!", ".", ",", "'", "?" or SPACE
4. Press Backspace
Actual results:
When using Backspace after chillu conjunct followed by punctuation mark or
SPACE, instead of deleting punctuation mark or SPACE only, the chillu conjunct
also gets deleted.
Expected results:
When using Backspace after chillu conjunct followed by punctuation mark or
SPACE, only the punctuation mark/SPACE should get deleted.
Additional info:
1. This does not happen when chillu comes in between a word. eg: നന്മ (0D28,
0D28, 0D4D, 200D, 0D2E)
2. This issue is not present in oowriter and kwrite. When above steps are
reproduced, deletions happens in correct order.
Versions used:
libicu-4.2.1-6.fc12 i686
qt-4.5.2-22.fc12 i686
3. Screenshot attached for chillu conjuncts and eg of words with chillu
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 10 months
[Bug 507292] New: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292
Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: rpm
AssignedTo: pmatilai(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pmatilai(a)redhat.com, jnovy(a)redhat.com,
ffesti(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
(this is mostly a yum-level RFE, but it would be nice if we kept the same
depsolving logic in both apps)
The problem:
Selecting a font is a multi-criterium operation. We need to match on font
family, font style, language support, unicode support, etc. At any time all of
just some of those selection criterii can be provided by the user or
applications.
To have features like font auto-installation work reliably, this matching needs
to extend to the package database
Right now rpm is only allowing to specify atomic provides, so we can have a
font package that
Provides font(dejavusans)
and
Provides
font(:lang=el)
but there is no warranty both those provides are belonging to the same font.
There is no way to distinguish between a package that includes an actual greek
dejavusans and a package that includes a dejavusans greek-less file and another
totally different greek font
To workaround this rpm limitation we've been asking packagers to put font files
belonging to different font families in different packages. However:
1. many still don't
2. it's not technically possible for all font formats, for example the ttc font
format allows mixing of fonts with different characteristics in a single file
The ideal solution:
Ability to have Provides like:
font(comma-separated font name list|comma-separated style list|comma-separated
lang list) (rough mockup that probably needs refining)
And have deps like (dejavu|*|el) work in rpm
(yes a font can declare many different names, be available in many different
styles, cover many different languages)
For ttc files we'd then generate one Provides for each font included in the ttc
bundle
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 1 month
[Bug 477387] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fonts-hebrew-fancy
AssignedTo: danken(a)cs.technion.ac.il
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: danken(a)cs.technion.ac.il,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 8 months
[Bug 522648] New: glyphs cut-off below "baseline" in firefox
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: glyphs cut-off below "baseline" in firefox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522648
Summary: glyphs cut-off below "baseline" in firefox
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Regression
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ipa-gothic-fonts
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
With ipa fonts being used for Japanese desktop,
it seems the bottom of letters with parts under
the Latin "baseline" tend to get cut-off in
textboxes in Firefox.
How reproducible:
every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to rawhide Japanese gnome desktop
2. Run firefox and type "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" into awesome bar.
3. sudo yum install vlgothic-fonts
4. repeat (2)
Actual results:
2. Bottom of letters 'g', 'j', 'p', 'q', 'y' are clipped
4. Displays fine.
Expected results:
2. All the glyphs to be visible.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 2 months
[Bug 485566] New: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566
Summary: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering
English, even in Japanese locale.
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
As you know, fontconfig finds proper fonts for text rendering,
depending on locales of process and text to render.
It works properly in the most cases, but there are some sever cases.
For example, if you type only "@" or "}" in gedit,
it uses glyph of VLGothic in Japanese locale.
However, if you type "a" after the first character,
it changes one's mind to choose glyphs of DejaVu fonts.
It's very annoying for Japanese users.
In the worst cases, the width of the indentations of sourcecode seems
different.
(As the width of the " " glyphs are differ between VLGothic and DejaVu)
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login X11 as a Japanese.
2. Open gedit and change the configuration to use "Monospace".
3. Type "@" on the first line, and "@a" on the first line.
Actual results:
"@" seems differ between the two lines.
Expected results:
"@" seems the same between the two lines.
The same glyph should be used for rendering the two "@".
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 3 months
[Bug 487061] New: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061
Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: vlgothic-fonts
AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net
ReportedBy: mcmonster(a)o2.pl
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; pl-PL; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009020410 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.6
I'm using irssi on gnome-terminal (Monospace font), after update Japanese fonts
changed, they're now much smaller (compared to latin), harder to read (some
ideograms are completely unreadable). It is very annoying, because I use
Japanese and sit on Japanese channel a lot. The change occured only in
terminal, in gEdit and other applications old fonts are still used for typing
(SCIM + Anthy) and displaying.
The change didn't affect everyone, some Fedora 10 still got old, simple and
readable fonts.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Just try displaying any Japanese text.
This is the update, that probably changed fonts:
Feb 14 02:31:53 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:32:39 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:32:42 Installed: vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:33:28 Erased: VLGothic-fonts
Feb 14 02:33:30 Erased: VLGothic-fonts-proportional
]# LANG=C yum list vlgothic\*
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
vlgothic-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10
installed
vlgothic-fonts-common.noarch 20090204-2.fc10
installed
Available Packages
VLGothic-fonts.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates
VLGothic-fonts-proportional.noarch 20081029-1.fc10 updates
vlgothic-p-fonts.noarch 20090204-2.fc10 updates
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 3 months
[Bug 477477] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: urw-fonts
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 4 months