fonts-bugs March 2010

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

18 participants
368 discussions

[Bug 491962] New: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491962 Summary: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ghostscript-fonts AssignedTo: twaugh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: twaugh(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 491961] New: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491961 Summary: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-KOI8-R AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 490830] New: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: nafees-web-naskh-fonts AssignedTo: mathieu.bridon(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: johnp(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, mathieu.bridon(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Nafees Web Naksha when installed shows only Nafees as font name in font selection box. When other Nafees fonts installed manually all will point to same name Nafees in font selection dialog box.This should not happen and should show all font names from Nafees font family Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.0-5.fc11.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install this font 2. open this font in fontforge 3. check TTFNames in FontInfo(Ctrl+Shift+F) 4. Look for Preferred Family and Family fields. Actual results: currently it shows font name as Nafees Expected results: Should show font name as Nafees Web Naksha Additional info: Thanks to Muhammad Saad who reported this on fedora-i18n channel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 478332] New: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478332 Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: urw-fonts AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: besfahbo(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Apparently glyph 227 (or maybe 226 according to fontforge) of /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022024l.pfb has a width of 740 while all the other glyphs in the font have width 600. This causes fontconfig to mark the font as proportional instead of monospace. That then is causing other issues: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 474514] New: file conflict on upgrading
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jun '10

26 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file conflict on upgrading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 Summary: file conflict on upgrading Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-BoldItalic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf from install of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -qa | grep dejavu dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 541888] New: Fontforge crashes when loading font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fontforge crashes when loading font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541888 Summary: Fontforge crashes when loading font Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com ReportedBy: tobias(a)ringis.se QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: It seems to crash no matter which font I try to open. New works. > fontforge /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. Failed to create a fontset for the input method -urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-2,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-3,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-4,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-5,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-9,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-10,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-15,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-koi8-uni,-arphic-ar pl uming cn-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0,-arphic-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-big5-0,-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1 Help! Server claimed font -arphic-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--13-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault (core dumped) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20090622-2.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install fontforge 2. fontforge /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf Actual results: Crash, boom, bang. (See above) Expected results: Less crash, boom and bang. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 548323] New: [hi_IN] 0953/0954 Font Shapes need improvement
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jun '10

10 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN] 0953/0954 Font Shapes need improvement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548323 Summary: [hi_IN] 0953/0954 Font Shapes need improvement Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-hindi-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=378900) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=378900) Screenshot for Shape different Description of problem: Shape of Code Point Glyph in Font is different with respect to Unicode 0953 0954 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. type 0953/0954 [॓/॔] in gedit 2. check code chart for those character 3. Actual results: Both has different Expected results: Need to same shape Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 565206] New: FTBFS ghostscript-fonts-5.50-23.fc12
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS ghostscript-fonts-5.50-23.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565206 Summary: FTBFS ghostscript-fonts-5.50-23.fc12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo ck-results/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Triaged Severity: high Priority: high Component: ghostscript-fonts AssignedTo: twaugh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: twaugh(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 538681 Classification: Fedora ghostscript-fonts-5.50-23.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information. If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug. Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug. If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one. Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies. (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created. Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 565136] New: FTBFS apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-5.fc13
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-5.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565136 Summary: FTBFS apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-5.fc13 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo ck-results/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Triaged Severity: high Priority: high Component: apanov-heuristica-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 538681 Classification: Fedora apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.2-5.fc13.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information. If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug. Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug. If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one. Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies. (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created. Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 477486] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '10

29 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
37
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs March 2010