Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525424
Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press
backspace key five times to delete the whole char
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, xinsun(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 501910
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Clone Of: 501910
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501910 +++
Description of problem:
When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key
five times to delete the whole char.
U+0929 U+094D U+0929 ऩ्ऩ
U+0931 U+094D U+0929 ऱ्ऩ
U+0934 U+094D U+0929 ऴ्ऩ
U+0929 U+094D U+0931 ऩ्ऱ
U+0931 U+094D U+0931 ऱ्ऱ
U+0934 U+094D U+0931 ऴ्ऱ
U+0931 U+094D U+0934 ऱ्ऴ
U+0929 U+094D U+0934 ऩ्ऴ
U+0934 U+094D U+0934 ऴ्ऴ
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge
2.Input the above shown unicode in gedit.
3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char.
Actual results:
We need press backspce key five times to delete the whole char.
Expected results:
We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char.
-----------
Bug Exist on Rawhide (f-12) with following version
lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch
pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64
Bug is not present for QT
qt-4.5.2-19.fc12.x86_64
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525871
Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN
data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: gnuplot
AssignedTo: varekova(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: varekova(a)redhat.com, pertusus(a)free.fr,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 182235,473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe
CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license
This data is embeded in many packages, including yours
Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
package
FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side
See also
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532
Summary: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far
worse
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: low
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mattdm(a)mattdm.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
It's cool that the patent expiration lets us enable the bytecode interpreter.
However, there's a severe flaw -- if there's no bytecode, apparently freetype
doesn't hint at all.
I use Inconsolata as my terminal font, and it normally looks great. After the
update, it got all fuzzy and basically unusable. This is sadly true for a great
many very nice fonts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852
Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D
U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press
backspace key need 14 times
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
DDescription of problem:
In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31
U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D with RAW CODE,then press backspace key,it needs
press 14 times
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31
U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW
CODE,press backspace key
Actual results:
It need press 14 times backspace key to delete the char
Expected result:
It should delete the char with 13 times backspace key
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551317
Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: psatya(a)yahoo.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
I have typed my Telugu text here using firefox browser
http://www.google.com/transliterate/indic/Telugu
and pasted it into OpenOffice Writer 3.1 with Lohit Telugu font version 2.4.5
selected.
Everything seem to be working fine though the newer Lohit font looks smaller
than an older version of Lohit font I was using earlier.
But the main problem here is, a dash (-) becomes an empty space. It looks like
a long space that is equivalent two chars approx.
I also tried to type a dash right in the OO but it doesn't work.
If I select Pothana2000 font instead of Lohit in OO, all my dashes work fine.
The Pothana2000 is another Unicode font for Telugu but I love the rounded
letter shapes of Lohit font so much!
Thanks a lot for this beautiful Lohit Telugu font.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Alias: F11-new-font-naming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443
Summary: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_pac
kage_naming_(2009-01-13)
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: distribution
AssignedTo: notting(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: notting(a)redhat.com
CC: katzj(a)redhat.com, jkeating(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 477044
Classification: Fedora
FPC unexpectedly refused to approve a proposal that put into writing the
package naming rules for fonts Fedora had been using in the past years, and
made us change it.
Deal with the fallout.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#fpc_renami…
The revised font naming rules are here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724
Summary: RFE: font merging
Product: fontconfig
Version: 2.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: medium
Component: library
AssignedTo: keithp(a)keithp.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Several major fonts like Arial and Droid Sans are created in two parts: a core
multifaced part and an Unicode extension (Arial Unicode, Droid Sans Fallback).
Splitting in two file sets allows people who do not need the extension part to
avoid installing it (since the extension is usually huge)
For historic reasons the two parts use different font family names, even though
from a functional user POW they are just two components of a single family.
There should be a documented way in fontconfig for font distributors to specify
via a config file "font foo is an extension of font bar, use it preferably when
bar is missing glyphs, do not show it as a separate item in font lists and only
allow access to the foo family when an application asks explicitely for it"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
AssignedTo: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_…
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2…http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_packagehttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_templatehttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870
Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts
accurately
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk
AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dbhole(a)redhat.com, mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately. Samplers such as
http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml
collect incomplete info
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-31.b16.fc12.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Get a F11 or rawhide system
2. Install our fonts # yum -y install $(repoquery --whatprovides "font(*)")
3. List them $ fc-list : family |sort
4. Open http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml
5. Let the applet run, check its result
Actual results:
The java-detected font list is incomplete (for example it's missing STIX) and
does not use the same names at fontconfig
Expected results:
The same list in both cases
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.