fonts-bugs March 2010

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

18 participants
368 discussions

[Bug 525618] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525618 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0915 U+094D U+0934" need press backspace key four times to delete the whole char. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, xinsun(a)redhat.com Depends on: 501905 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 501905 Clone for Rawhide (fedora 12) Exist in follogig version ---- pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501905 +++ Description of problem: When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key four times to delete the whole char. U+0915 U+094D U+0934 क्ऴ U+0916 U+094D U+0934 ख्ऴ U+0917 U+094D U+0934 ग्ऴ U+0918 U+094D U+0934 घ्ऴ U+0919 U+094D U+0934 ङ्ऴ U+091A U+094D U+0934 च्ऴ U+091B U+094D U+0934 छ्ऴ U+091C U+094D U+0934 ज्ऴ U+091D U+094D U+0934 झ्ऴ U+091E U+094D U+0934 ञ्ऴ U+091F U+094D U+0934 ट्ऴ U+0920 U+094D U+0934 ठ्ऴ U+0921 U+094D U+0934 ड्ऴ U+0922 U+094D U+0934 ढ्ऴ U+0923 U+094D U+0934 ण्ऴ U+0924 U+094D U+0934 त्ऴ U+0925 U+094D U+0934 थ्ऴ U+0926 U+094D U+0934 द्ऴ U+0927 U+094D U+0934 ध्ऴ U+0928 U+094D U+0934 न्ऴ U+092A U+094D U+0934 प्ऴ U+092B U+094D U+0934 फ्ऴ U+092C U+094D U+0934 ब्ऴ U+092D U+094D U+0934 भ्ऴ U+092E U+094D U+0934 म्ऴ U+092F U+094D U+0934 य्ऴ U+0930 U+094D U+0934 र्ऴ U+0932 U+094D U+0934 ल्ऴ U+0933 U+094D U+0934 ळ्ऴ U+0935 U+094D U+0934 व्ऴ U+0936 U+094D U+0934 श्ऴ U+0937 U+094D U+0934 ष्ऴ U+0939 U+094D U+0934 ह्ऴ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input the above shown unicode in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key four times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. --- Additional comment from xinsun(a)redhat.com on 2009-05-21 05:48:46 EDT --- [hi_IN][GSUB] U+0934 U+094D U+0915 ऴ्क U+0934 U+094D U+0916 ऴ्ख U+0934 U+094D U+0917 ऴ्ग U+0934 U+094D U+0918 ऴ्घ U+0934 U+094D U+0919 ऴ्ङ U+0934 U+094D U+091A ऴ्च U+0934 U+094D U+091B ऴ्छ U+0934 U+094D U+091C ऴ्ज U+0934 U+094D U+091D ऴ्झ U+0934 U+094D U+091E ऴ्ञ U+0934 U+094D U+091F ऴ्ट U+0934 U+094D U+0920 ऴ्ठ U+0934 U+094D U+0921 ऴ्ड U+0934 U+094D U+0922 ऴ्ढ U+0934 U+094D U+0923 ऴ्ण U+0934 U+094D U+0924 ऴ्त U+0934 U+094D U+0925 ऴ्थ U+0934 U+094D U+0926 ऴ्द U+0934 U+094D U+0927 ऴ्ध U+0934 U+094D U+0928 ऴ्न U+0934 U+094D U+092A ऴ्प U+0934 U+094D U+092B ऴ्फ U+0934 U+094D U+092C ऴ्ब U+0934 U+094D U+092D ऴ्भ U+0934 U+094D U+092E ऴ्म U+0934 U+094D U+092F ऴ्य U+0934 U+094D U+0930 ऴ्र U+0934 U+094D U+0932 ऴ्ल U+0934 U+094D U+0933 ऴ्ळ U+0934 U+094D U+0935 ऴ्व U+0934 U+094D U+0936 ऴ्श U+0934 U+094D U+0937 ऴ्ष U+0934 U+094D U+0938 ऴ्स U+0934 U+094D U+0939 ऴ्ह also have this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 525424] New: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525424 Summary: [hi_IN][GSUB]"U+0929 U+094D U+0929" need press backspace key five times to delete the whole char Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, xinsun(a)redhat.com Depends on: 501910 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 501910 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501910 +++ Description of problem: When input the below shown unicode in gedit, we need to press Backspace key five times to delete the whole char. U+0929 U+094D U+0929 ऩ्ऩ U+0931 U+094D U+0929 ऱ्ऩ U+0934 U+094D U+0929 ऴ्ऩ U+0929 U+094D U+0931 ऩ्ऱ U+0931 U+094D U+0931 ऱ्ऱ U+0934 U+094D U+0931 ऴ्ऱ U+0931 U+094D U+0934 ऱ्ऴ U+0929 U+094D U+0934 ऩ्ऴ U+0934 U+094D U+0934 ऴ्ऴ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input the above shown unicode in gedit. 3.Press Backspace key to delete the whole char. Actual results: We need press backspce key five times to delete the whole char. Expected results: We should press backspace key three times to delete the whole char. ----------- Bug Exist on Rawhide (f-12) with following version lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.x86_64 Bug is not present for QT qt-4.5.2-19.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 525871] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jun '11

13 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525871 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gnuplot AssignedTo: varekova(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: varekova(a)redhat.com, pertusus(a)free.fr, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license This data is embeded in many packages, including yours Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data package FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 547532] New: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532 Summary: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mattdm(a)mattdm.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora It's cool that the patent expiration lets us enable the bytecode interpreter. However, there's a severe flaw -- if there's no bytecode, apparently freetype doesn't hint at all. I use Inconsolata as my terminal font, and it normally looks great. After the update, it got all fuzzy and basically unusable. This is sadly true for a great many very nice fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 61

[Bug 501852] New: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '11

25 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- DDescription of problem: In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D with RAW CODE,then press backspace key,it needs press 14 times Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW CODE,press backspace key Actual results: It need press 14 times backspace key to delete the char Expected result: It should delete the char with 13 times backspace key Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 551317] New: A dash becomes a long empty space.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 May '11

24 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551317 Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: psatya(a)yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I have typed my Telugu text here using firefox browser http://www.google.com/transliterate/indic/Telugu and pasted it into OpenOffice Writer 3.1 with Lohit Telugu font version 2.4.5 selected. Everything seem to be working fine though the newer Lohit font looks smaller than an older version of Lohit font I was using earlier. But the main problem here is, a dash (-) becomes an empty space. It looks like a long space that is equivalent two chars approx. I also tried to type a dash right in the OO but it doesn't work. If I select Pothana2000 font instead of Lohit in OO, all my dashes work fine. The Pothana2000 is another Unicode font for Telugu but I love the rounded letter shapes of Lohit font so much! Thanks a lot for this beautiful Lohit Telugu font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 480443] New: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '11

18 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines Alias: F11-new-font-naming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Summary: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_pac kage_naming_(2009-01-13) OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: notting(a)redhat.com CC: katzj(a)redhat.com, jkeating(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora FPC unexpectedly refused to approve a proposal that put into writing the package naming rules for fonts Fedora had been using in the past years, and made us change it. Deal with the fallout. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#fpc_renami… The revised font naming rules are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 78

[Bug 18724] New: RFE: font merging
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org 14 Mar '11

14 Mar '11

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724 Summary: RFE: font merging Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: keithp(a)keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Several major fonts like Arial and Droid Sans are created in two parts: a core multifaced part and an Unicode extension (Arial Unicode, Droid Sans Fallback). Splitting in two file sets allows people who do not need the extension part to avoid installing it (since the extension is usually huge) For historic reasons the two parts use different font family names, even though from a functional user POW they are just two components of a single family. There should be a documented way in fontconfig for font distributors to specify via a config file "font foo is an extension of font bar, use it preferably when bar is missing glyphs, do not show it as a separate item in font lists and only allow access to the foo family when an application asks explicitely for it" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 477418] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: linux-libertine-fonts AssignedTo: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin(a)tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 22

[Bug 525870] New: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '11

19 Jan '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525870 Summary: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: langel(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dbhole(a)redhat.com, mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Java plugin does not report available fonts accurately. Samplers such as http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml collect incomplete info Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-31.b16.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Get a F11 or rawhide system 2. Install our fonts # yum -y install $(repoquery --whatprovides "font(*)") 3. List them $ fc-list : family |sort 4. Open http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-Unix.shtml 5. Let the applet run, check its result Actual results: The java-detected font list is incomplete (for example it's missing STIX) and does not use the same names at fontconfig Expected results: The same list in both cases Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
37
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs March 2010