fonts-bugs July 2010

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

33 participants
503 discussions

[Bug 525871] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jun '11

13 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525871 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gnuplot AssignedTo: varekova(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: varekova(a)redhat.com, pertusus(a)free.fr, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license This data is embeded in many packages, including yours Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data package FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 547532] New: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532 Summary: enabling bytecode interpreter makes things far, far worse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mattdm(a)mattdm.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora It's cool that the patent expiration lets us enable the bytecode interpreter. However, there's a severe flaw -- if there's no bytecode, apparently freetype doesn't hint at all. I use Inconsolata as my terminal font, and it normally looks great. After the update, it got all fuzzy and basically unusable. This is sadly true for a great many very nice fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 61

[Bug 603348] New: [UMing] Only upper half characters are displayed.in java application
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 May '11

30 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [UMing] Only upper half characters are displayed.in java application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603348 Summary: [UMing] Only upper half characters are displayed.in java application Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: dbhole(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dbhole(a)redhat.com, mark(a)klomp.org, langel(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, dchen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, mmatejov(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Depends on: 597096 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 597096 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #597096 +++ Created an attachment (id=417485) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=417485) Freemind with UMing font Description of problem: When using uming font in java application, only upper half the characters are displayed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-37.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. We use freemind for example. 2. Download freemind zip and install it, say, in /tmp/freemind 3. cd /tmp/freemind; chmod 755 freemind.sh; ./freemind.sh 4. In F-13, java is not able to show Chinese, because the font name and path changes. Suppose we use java-1.6.0-openjdk. 5. su or sudo as root 6. cd /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/lib 7. cp fontconfig.Fedora.properties.src fontconfig.Fedora.properties 8. Either manually search/replace AR PL ShanHeiSong to AR PL UMing HK fontconfig.Fedora.properties; or use attached fontconfig.Fedora.properties 9. Start freemind to see the how font is displayed Actual results: UMing characters are cut in to half. See Screenshot-uming.png Expected results: UMing characters are displayed as whole. Additional info: UKai seems act normally. See Screenshot-ukai.png --- Additional comment from dchen(a)redhat.com on 2010-05-28 02:07:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=417487) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=417487) Freemind with UKai font --- Additional comment from dchen(a)redhat.com on 2010-05-28 02:08:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=417488) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=417488) Fontconfig file for java -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 597096] New: [UMing] Only upper half characters are displayed.in java application
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 May '11

30 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [UMing] Only upper half characters are displayed.in java application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597096 Summary: [UMing] Only upper half characters are displayed.in java application Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: dchen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwu(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=417485) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=417485) Freemind with UMing font Description of problem: When using uming font in java application, only upper half the characters are displayed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-37.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. We use freemind for example. 2. Download freemind zip and install it, say, in /tmp/freemind 3. cd /tmp/freemind; chmod 755 freemind.sh; ./freemind.sh 4. In F-13, java is not able to show Chinese, because the font name and path changes. Suppose we use java-1.6.0-openjdk. 5. su or sudo as root 6. cd /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/lib 7. cp fontconfig.Fedora.properties.src fontconfig.Fedora.properties 8. Either manually search/replace AR PL ShanHeiSong to AR PL UMing HK fontconfig.Fedora.properties; or use attached fontconfig.Fedora.properties 9. Start freemind to see the how font is displayed Actual results: UMing characters are cut in to half. See Screenshot-uming.png Expected results: UMing characters are displayed as whole. Additional info: UKai seems act normally. See Screenshot-ukai.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 501852] New: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '11

25 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501852 Summary: [ml_IN] U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D press backspace key need 14 times Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- DDescription of problem: In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D with RAW CODE,then press backspace key,it needs press 14 times Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0D07 U+0D28 U+0D4D U+200D U+0D38 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4D U+0D31 U+0D4B U+0D33 U+0D4D U+200D+0D21 U+0D4D U+0D30 U+0D48 U+0D35 U+0D4D with RAW CODE,press backspace key Actual results: It need press 14 times backspace key to delete the char Expected result: It should delete the char with 13 times backspace key Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 551317] New: A dash becomes a long empty space.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 May '11

24 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551317 Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: psatya(a)yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora I have typed my Telugu text here using firefox browser http://www.google.com/transliterate/indic/Telugu and pasted it into OpenOffice Writer 3.1 with Lohit Telugu font version 2.4.5 selected. Everything seem to be working fine though the newer Lohit font looks smaller than an older version of Lohit font I was using earlier. But the main problem here is, a dash (-) becomes an empty space. It looks like a long space that is equivalent two chars approx. I also tried to type a dash right in the OO but it doesn't work. If I select Pothana2000 font instead of Lohit in OO, all my dashes work fine. The Pothana2000 is another Unicode font for Telugu but I love the rounded letter shapes of Lohit font so much! Thanks a lot for this beautiful Lohit Telugu font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 480443] New: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '11

18 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines Alias: F11-new-font-naming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Summary: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_pac kage_naming_(2009-01-13) OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: notting(a)redhat.com CC: katzj(a)redhat.com, jkeating(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora FPC unexpectedly refused to approve a proposal that put into writing the package naming rules for fonts Fedora had been using in the past years, and made us change it. Deal with the fallout. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#fpc_renami… The revised font naming rules are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 78

[Bug 612395] New: The patents have expired!
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 May '11

16 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: The patents have expired! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612395 Summary: The patents have expired! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alejandronova(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora According to http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690621 , we can safely enable the bytecode interpreter in Fedora and all the code covered by those patents. They have expired since May, 2010. Legal, is this safe? Can we make a quick import of the RPM Fusion package into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 18724] New: RFE: font merging
by bugzilla-daemon＠freedesktop.org 14 Mar '11

14 Mar '11

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18724 Summary: RFE: font merging Product: fontconfig Version: 2.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: keithp(a)keithp.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Several major fonts like Arial and Droid Sans are created in two parts: a core multifaced part and an Unicode extension (Arial Unicode, Droid Sans Fallback). Splitting in two file sets allows people who do not need the extension part to avoid installing it (since the extension is usually huge) For historic reasons the two parts use different font family names, even though from a functional user POW they are just two components of a single family. There should be a documented way in fontconfig for font distributors to specify via a config file "font foo is an extension of font bar, use it preferably when bar is missing glyphs, do not show it as a separate item in font lists and only allow access to the foo family when an application asks explicitely for it" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 477418] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: linux-libertine-fonts AssignedTo: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: frank(a)scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin(a)tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 22

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
51
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs July 2010