December 2011 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 769654] New: Glyphs have gone missing from monospace

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Glyphs have gone missing from monospace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769654 Summary: Glyphs have gone missing from monospace Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: fontpackages AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: geoff(a)dyalog.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Use Konsole. Set it up to use monospace 2.Paste the following to the session ⍪⍝⍎⍕ 3. Actual results: ⎕⎕⎕⎕ Expected results: ⍪⍝⍎⍕ Additional info: These used to work in Fedora 13. In addition lots of glyphs have size problems ⌶ in particular. Ⓐ thru Ⓩ have width problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #46 from John Mellor <john.mellor(a)gmail.com> 2011-12-22 09:24:09 EST --- I have not reproduced the specific problem, but running Evolution under valgrind became increasingly slow and eventually locked up for 15+ minutes until I aborted. Inspecting the logs, I see some memory errors in normal operation, so something is definitely wrong in the memory management. I'll attached the log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #45 from John Mellor <john.mellor(a)gmail.com> 2011-12-22 09:22:44 EST --- Created attachment 549198 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=549198 Valgrind run, showing some memory problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #44 from Milan Crha <mcrha(a)redhat.com> 2011-12-22 08:08:23 EST --- I do not know any hint on reproducer except of trying similar steps under valgrind, even it is fairly slow. The thing is that this is some kid of memory corruption, which can happen in part A and influence completely different part B of the code. The best is that it can influence different parts of the code each run, depending what is currently stored in the memory it corrupts. Valgrind is one tool I know of, which can identify these types of issues. With folder size, I guess it might not be a problem, I have even larger IMAP folders and I do not recall seeing this myself. It's rather some kind of your setup/environment, which uncovers the hidden issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #43 from Mark van Rossum <mvanross(a)inf.ed.ac.uk> 2011-12-22 07:48:27 EST --- I wonder how to further narrow this down. I see it about once per week when sending (always via IMAP). Unfortunately, under these circumstances running evolution with valgrind is way too slow. I have the feeling that to bug is more likely to occur with high system and/or network load. Furthermore, I have fairly large folders (about 5k messages in Inbox and Sent). Could the update of the Sent folder cause the crash? Is it possible to run a script that sends many dummy messages to make the crash more likely to happen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #42 from John Mellor <john.mellor(a)gmail.com> 2011-12-22 07:26:01 EST --- Milan said: > are you sure this is the same issue as this bug report? I would like to see > updated backtrace from Fedora 16, with debug information at least from > evolution-data-server, evolution and gtkhtml3, and if you can reproduce this > reliably, then even the valgrind log may help here, because this seems like a > memory corruption issue. Abrt decided that this was the same bug report, not me. As noted in a prior update in this bug report, the chances of reproducing this issue on demand are low, as it appears to be a near-random event, possibly a memory corruption issue or something similar. The only partial common thread in all of the reports is that it appears to be triggered when sending mail, with low probability of occurance. I've only seen it twice in a year. So, I'll try, but don't hold your breath... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #41 from Milan Crha <mcrha(a)redhat.com> 2011-12-22 03:16:54 EST --- OK, I would move this to Fedora 16, but before that, are you sure this is the same issue as this bug report? I would like to see updated backtrace from Fedora 16, with debug information at least from evolution-data-server, evolution and gtkhtml3, and if you can reproduce this reliably, then even the valgrind log may help here, because this seems like a memory corruption issue. Thanks in advance. To get backtrace, just run evolution under gdb like this: $ gdb evolution --ex r --ex "t a a bt" --ex q and reproduce the issue. At the end the gdb will ask you whether you want to quit. Answer "y". Then get its output. Make sure it'll not include any private information, like email addresses, passwords or server addresses you do not want to share in public. To get valgrind log run evolution like this: $ G_SLICE=always-malloc valgrind --num-callers=50 evolution &>log.txt and try to reproduce the issue. Note that evolution will be significantly slower due to all memory checking. Also note that valgrind can avoid certain crashes, which it only logs into the file, thus even if evolution will not crash then the log.txt file can contain information about the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #40 from John Mellor <john.mellor(a)gmail.com> 2011-12-21 15:29:40 EST --- The problem is still present in Fedora 16. This bug needs to be fixed before Fedora 15 expires in 4 months, or shifted to be in Fedora 16 so that it does not get dropped on the floor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 701604] [abrt] evolution-3.0.1-1.fc15: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701604 --- Comment #39 from John Mellor <john.mellor(a)gmail.com> 2011-12-21 15:20:03 EST --- Nothing obviously different for this mail. I replied to an all-text email, noticed a problem removing some of the fluff in the original text (could not delete the first quoted line, which was empty, but could delete the rest of the unimportant parts of the quote), and was able to construct a fairly large reply message. Upon hitting "Send", Evolution aborted immediately. It is not known what happened to the new message. rating: 4 Package: evolution-3.2.2-1.fc16 Architecture: x86_64 OS Release: Fedora release 16 (Verne) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[liberation-fonts/f16] Resolved bug 753572, removed hint of cent sign

by Pravin Satpute

commit eb7de6bd5275b2daa67ae8e17636ef8d236d1f5c Author: प्रविण सातपुते <psatpute(a)redhat.com> Date: Wed Dec 21 16:08:12 2011 +0530 Resolved bug 753572, removed hint of cent sign bug-753572.patch | 241 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ liberation-fonts.spec | 7 ++- 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/bug-753572.patch b/bug-753572.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1ab60cd --- /dev/null +++ b/bug-753572.patch @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ +diff -rup liberation-fonts-1.07.1/LiberationMono-Italic.sfd liberation-fonts-1.07.1_mod/LiberationMono-Italic.sfd +--- liberation-fonts-1.07.1/LiberationMono-Italic.sfd 2011-09-21 10:38:17.000000000 +0530 ++++ liberation-fonts-1.07.1_mod/LiberationMono-Italic.sfd 2011-12-21 15:52:16.207688243 +0530 +@@ -13,13 +13,14 @@ Descent: 410 + LayerCount: 2 + Layer: 0 1 "Back" 1 + Layer: 1 1 "Fore" 0 ++NeedsXUIDChange: 1 + XUID: [1021 131 222397055 1812088] + FSType: 0 + OS2Version: 3 + OS2_WeightWidthSlopeOnly: 0 + OS2_UseTypoMetrics: 1 + CreationTime: 1095817380 +-ModificationTime: 1316579605 ++ModificationTime: 1324462933 + PfmFamily: 17 + TTFWeight: 400 + TTFWidth: 5 +@@ -3414,7 +3415,7 @@ NameList: Adobe Glyph List + DisplaySize: -24 + AntiAlias: 1 + FitToEm: 1 +-WinInfo: 336 56 18 ++WinInfo: 56 56 18 + BeginPrivate: 0 + EndPrivate + BeginChars: 1114127 673 +@@ -20521,211 +20522,9 @@ EndChar + StartChar: cent + Encoding: 162 162 99 + Width: 1229 +-Flags: W ++Flags: HW + HStem: 134.006 140.036<413.565 490.918> 1053.38 141.616<548.356 669.686 825.219 905.517> + VStem: 141 186<361.703 770.458> 965 188<873 994.143> +-TtInstrs: +-SVTCA[y-axis] +-PUSHB_1 +- 19 +-MDAP[rnd] +-PUSHB_1 +- 16 +-SHP[rp1] +-PUSHB_1 +- 0 +-MDRP[min,rnd,black] +-PUSHB_1 +- 9 +-SHP[rp2] +-PUSHB_1 +- 1 +-MDAP[rnd] +-PUSHB_1 +- 38 +-SHP[rp1] +-PUSHB_1 +- 28 +-MDRP[min,rnd,black] +-PUSHB_1 +- 31 +-SHP[rp2] +-SVTCA[x-axis] +-PUSHB_1 +- 39 +-MDAP[rnd] +-PUSHB_1 +- 23 +-MDRP[rp0,rnd,white] +-PUSHB_1 +- 7 +-MDRP[min,rnd,black] +-PUSHB_1 +- 7 +-SRP0 +-PUSHB_1 +- 36 +-MDRP[rp0,min,rnd,grey] +-PUSHB_1 +- 35 +-MDRP[min,rnd,black] +-PUSHB_1 +- 35 +-SRP0 +-PUSHB_1 +- 40 +-MDRP[rp0,rnd,white] +-PUSHB_1 +- 54 +-SMD +-PUSHW_2 +- 16083 +- -3127 +-SPVFS +-SFVTPV +-PUSHB_1 +- 18 +-SRP0 +-PUSHB_1 +- 29 +-MDRP[grey] +-PUSHB_2 +- 17 +- 2 +-MIRP[rp0,min,black] +-PUSHB_1 +- 30 +-MDRP[grey] +-SFVTCA[x-axis] +-PUSHB_1 +- 18 +-SRP0 +-PUSHB_2 +- 18 +- 29 +-SPVTL[orthog] +-PUSHB_1 +- 0 +-MDRP[grey] +-PUSHB_1 +- 1 +-MDRP[grey] +-PUSHB_1 +- 17 +-SRP0 +-PUSHB_1 +- 9 +-MDRP[grey] +-PUSHB_1 +- 16 +-MDRP[grey] +-PUSHB_1 +- 18 +-SRP0 +-PUSHB_1 +- 19 +-MDRP[grey] +-PUSHB_1 +- 28 +-MDRP[grey] +-PUSHB_1 +- 17 +-SRP0 +-PUSHB_1 +- 31 +-MDRP[grey] +-PUSHB_1 +- 38 +-MDRP[grey] +-SPVTCA[x-axis] +-SVTCA[y-axis] +-PUSHB_4 +- 17 +- 18 +- 29 +- 30 +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-SVTCA[x-axis] +-NPUSHB +- 12 +- 0 +- 1 +- 9 +- 16 +- 17 +- 18 +- 19 +- 28 +- 29 +- 30 +- 31 +- 38 +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-MDAP[no-rnd] +-PUSHB_1 +- 64 +-SMD +-PUSHB_2 +- 36 +- 7 +-SRP1 +-SRP2 +-PUSHB_1 +- 11 +-IP +-PUSHB_1 +- 35 +-SRP1 +-PUSHB_1 +- 12 +-IP +-SVTCA[y-axis] +-PUSHB_2 +- 0 +- 19 +-SRP1 +-SRP2 +-PUSHB_2 +- 15 +- 20 +-IP +-IP +-PUSHB_1 +- 1 +-SRP1 +-PUSHB_7 +- 7 +- 11 +- 12 +- 22 +- 23 +- 35 +- 36 +-DEPTH +-SLOOP +-IP +-PUSHB_1 +- 28 +-SRP2 +-PUSHB_1 +- 32 +-IP +-IUP[y] +-IUP[x] +-EndTTInstrs + LayerCount: 2 + Fore + SplineSet diff --git a/liberation-fonts.spec b/liberation-fonts.spec index 5784b84..1e51616 100644 --- a/liberation-fonts.spec +++ b/liberation-fonts.spec @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ New. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.07.1 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils BuildRequires: fontforge >= 20090408 Patch1: bug-657849.patch +Patch2: bug-753572.patch %description %common_desc @@ -112,6 +113,7 @@ rm -rf src cp %{SOURCE1} . chmod 755 generate.pe %patch1 -p1 -b .1-added-serbian-locale-glyphs +%patch2 -p1 -b .2-cleared-hint-of-cent-sign %build ./generate.pe *.sfd @@ -136,6 +138,9 @@ mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} %__rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Wed Dec 21 2011 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> - 1.07.1-3 +- Resolved bug 753572, removed hint of cent sign + * Fri Oct 14 2011 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> - 1.07.1-2 - Resolved bug 657849, added support in Sans and Serif

12 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs December 2011