fonts-bugs May 2013

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

14 participants
209 discussions

[urw-fonts/f19] post scriptlet cleanup, dont redirect it to dev/null either
by Than Ngo 06 May '13

06 May '13

Summary of changes: bed9f62... post scriptlet cleanup, dont redirect it to dev/null either (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent

1 0

Broken dependencies: fontforge
by Fedora Koji Build System 05 May '13

05 May '13

fontforge has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On x86_64: fontforge-20080828-1.1.el5.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

Broken dependencies: fontforge
by Fedora Koji Build System 05 May '13

05 May '13

fontforge has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On x86_64: fontforge-20080828-1.1.el5.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

[Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 May '13

02 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #16 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> --- There's a 3rd possibility of course: we both got lucky on our Rawhide builds and the real bug is still lurking. Spot, can you push your change to F-19, though, so we can see if that helps? The F-19 cvc3 build just failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5325941 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C5f1UZxMwQ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 May '13

02 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #15 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> --- Rawhide build of cvc3 just worked, too. Either the actual cause of this bug went away on its own very recently, or something funny is going on with "which" in Rawhide. Do we need the urw-fonts change for F-19, too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jObSJgXqwf&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 May '13

02 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> --- ... and the rawhide build just succeeded. I got nothing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S2lZXSxlWq&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 May '13

02 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> --- I don't think it is an ordering issue with "which" and urw-fonts. I can see which getting installed in the "base" transaction, before it does the second pass to install the BuildRequires. Whatever the issue is, it seems to be very... random. An f19 build of nightview succeeded, but not yet in rawhide. :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eRqqmnlKI5&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[urw-fonts] post scriptlet cleanup, dont redirect it to dev/null either
by Tom Callaway 02 May '13

02 May '13

commit bed9f6298d450f371265ad7434e52f6f4a1cb56f Author: Tom Callaway <spot(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Thu May 2 12:24:26 2013 -0400 post scriptlet cleanup, dont redirect it to dev/null either urw-fonts.spec | 7 +++++-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/urw-fonts.spec b/urw-fonts.spec index bc7680c..01113e2 100644 --- a/urw-fonts.spec +++ b/urw-fonts.spec @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Summary: Free versions of the 35 standard PostScript fonts. Name: urw-fonts Version: 2.4 -Release: 14%{?dist} +Release: 15%{?dist} Source: %{name}-%{filippov_version}.tar.bz2 URL: http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/urw-fonts-1.0.7pre44/ # URW holds copyright @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ ln -sf %{fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/fonts-default { umask 133 mkfontscale %{fontdir} || : - `which mkfontdir` %{fontdir} || : + mkfontdir %{fontdir} || : fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts } &> /dev/null || : @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{fontdir}/*.pfb %changelog +* Thu May 2 2013 Tom Callaway <spot(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.4-15 +- simplify post scriptlet a bit, don't drop output to /dev/null for debugging purposes + * Tue Feb 26 2013 Susi Lehtola <jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.4-14 - Added Requires(post): xorg-x11-font-utils (BZ #478786).

1 0

[Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '13

01 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #12 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> --- The spec file does not have "Requires(post): which". Is there any possibility that, in a mock build, urw-fonts is installed before which? If so, that could cause the failure. But the use of which is nonsensical anyway. It's going to return the mkfontdir it finds on $PATH. But since it is on $PATH, you can just say: mkfontdir /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8vyIw3eU4G&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs May 2013