fonts-bugs January 2014

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
237 discussions

[Bug 1007493] New: shipped fonts.alias includes references to missing sazanami-times font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007493 Bug ID: 1007493 Summary: shipped fonts.alias includes references to missing sazanami-times font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: sazanami-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: leftmostcat(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com fonts.alias in the sazanami package is reporting the existence of a sazanami-times font face to Xorg which does not appear to exist. This is causing problems in other packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Put14MbDrK&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 24

[Bug 477477] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '14

28 Nov '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: urw-fonts AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 995643] New: After updating to freetype 2.5.0, hinting rendering is strange
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995643 Bug ID: 995643 Summary: After updating to freetype 2.5.0, hinting rendering is strange Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: freetype Severity: medium Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: sangu.fedora(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com Created attachment 785048 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=785048&action=edit freetype 2.5.0 vs 2.4.11 Description of problem: After updating to freetype 2.5.0, hinting rendering is strange Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.0-3.fc20. How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ftview -m "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog." 24 "/usr/share/fonts/abattis-cantarell/Cantarell-Regular.otf" 2. click "h" key 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YXthQ0kMNV&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Bug 890986] New: sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.110 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890986 Bug ID: 890986 Summary: sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.110 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: sil-charis-compact-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 4.110 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 4.106 URL: http://scripts.sil.org/CharisSIL_download Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=l7SwJKbniG&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

[Bug 843331] New: [ta_IN] Please add glyphs for minority orthographies in Tamil
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843331 Bug ID: 843331 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: [ta_IN] Please add glyphs for minority orthographies in Tamil Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: lohit-tamil-fonts Product: Fedora Created attachment 600434 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=600434&action=edit Glyphs required for minority orthographies in Tamil While the Tamil script is mainly used for writing Tamil language text, it is also attested to be used for other language text such as Sanskrit, Saurashtra, Hindi, Marathi, Telugu and Kannada in the form of transliteration. For these minority orthography usecases, some characters from script-neutral blocks are required: 1) The superscript digits ¹²³⁴ would be used for representing the varga consonants (actually ¹ is only used very rarely). The Unicode chapter on Tamil script documents this and recommends the characters (0xb9) 0xb2 0xb3 0x2074. 2) Not only the superscript digits but their corresponding subscript digits ₁₂₃₄ (0x2081-0x2084) are also attested as a stylistic variant choice. 3) The modifier letter apostrophe 02BC ʼ is also seen. 4) Further, sometimes the candrabindu is also seen for nasality. Since there is no Tamil candrabindu character, the generic candrabindu ◌̐ at 0310 can be used. 5) The visarga is commonly seen but the Tamil visarga code point 0B83 is mapped to the Tamil special letter aytam ஃ (which has three dots against the visarga's two dots), so we will have to place the two-dot visarga in the PUA. (Not ideal I know, but it is unlikely to encode a Tamil-specific two-dot visarga. It is not possible to use the Devanagari visarga codepoint 0903 since rendering engines will produce dotted circles as it is not correct to combine Devanagari codepoints with Tamil codepoints.) Attestations for these usages and required glyphs are attached. Please add them with the appropriate script-neutral codepoints shown in the patch TTF so Lohit Tamil (and Lohit Tamil Classical) is also useful for these minority orthographies. BTW it would be good font design policy to make the modifier apostrophe a composite glyph of the regular apostrophe and subscript digits as composites of superscript digits. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 648143] New: apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.3 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.3 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648143 Summary: apanov-heuristica-fonts-0.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: medium Priority: low Component: apanov-heuristica-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.3 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.2.2 URL: http://code.google.com/p/evristika/downloads/list Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 499790] New: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499790 Summary: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: GSUB press Delete key to delete the whole char,it can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3. I think it is a regression bug. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0C15 U+0C4D U+0C15 2.Press Delete key to delete the char 3. Actual results: It can't delete the whole char,it will delete part of the char Expected results: It will delete the whole char. Additional info: All of chars in [te_IN][GSUB] has the same problem. But in rhel 5.3 they work well. So I think it is a regression problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 1037608] New: fontforge is too old
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Sep '14

08 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037608 Bug ID: 1037608 Summary: fontforge is too old Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontforge Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com Reporter: hongjiu.lu(a)intel.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com fontforge seems to have moved to https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=65czQimac1&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 15

[Bug 957625] New: libfontenc-1.1.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jul '14

24 Jul '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957625 Bug ID: 957625 Summary: libfontenc-1.1.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: libfontenc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: sandmann(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sandmann(a)redhat.com Category: --- Latest upstream release: 1.1.2 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.1.1 URL: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/lib/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rNMfGVJWFQ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 925726] New: libfontenc: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '14

14 Jul '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925726 Bug ID: 925726 Summary: libfontenc: Does not support aarch64 in f19 and rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: libfontenc Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: sandmann(a)redhat.com Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sandmann(a)redhat.com Blocks: 922257 (ARM64) Support for the ARM 64 bit CPU architecture (aarch64) was introduced in autoconf 2.69. libfontenc appears to use an earlier version of autoconf, preventing its being built. This can be fixed in of three ways (In order of preference): 1. Work with upstream to migrate the package to autoconf 2.69. 2. Rerun autoconf or autoreconf in %prep or %build prior to running configure. 3. Apply the patch at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/aarch64/libfontenc/libfontenc-aarch64.patch which updates config.guess and config.sub to recognize aarch64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FYM2C3sLRD&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2014