fonts-bugs January 2014

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
237 discussions

[Bug 995790] New: Wrong rendering for സ്റ്റ asa
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Feb '14

21 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995790 Bug ID: 995790 Summary: Wrong rendering for സ്റ്റ asa Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: anivar.aravind(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Rendering is wrong for Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5vQbENJG8r&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 13

[Bug 960212] New: Broken ė in DejaVu Sans Bold and Italic
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Feb '14

21 Feb '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960212 Bug ID: 960212 Summary: Broken ė in DejaVu Sans Bold and Italic Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: dejavu-fonts Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, peter(a)thecodergeek.com Category: --- Created attachment 744278 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=744278&action=edit Screendump showing the letter ė in DejaVu Sans at various sizes Description of problem: The letter ė is broken in DejaVu Sans on small sizes of the Italic font and the Bold font. The attachment shows a screendump of the letters ėĖ in sizes 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 and 16 in DejaVu Sans. The first row shows Regular, then Italic, than Bold and last Bold Italic. Sizes 8-12 of the Bold font and 8-13 of the Italic font shows the dot above as a vertical line starting where the dot is supposed to be and ending at the baseline. Larger sizes look OK, as do all sizes of Regular and Bold Italic. The capital Ė looks OK everywhere. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dejavu-sans-fonts-2.33-4.fc18.noarch How reproducible: Always. It is seen in multiple applications. The screenshot is done in Libre Office, but the same thing happens in e.g. firefox. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I3883HddAH&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Bug 706559] New: Font variants not used correctly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '14

16 Feb '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Font variants not used correctly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706559 Summary: Font variants not used correctly Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2(a)infradead.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- I have installed some company-provided fonts for use in presentations etc.: $ ls /usr/share/fonts/neo-sans-intel/ NeoSansIntel-Italic.ttf NeoSansIntel-MediumItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-LightItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-Medium.ttf NeoSansIntel-Light.ttf NeoSansIntel.ttf In LibreOffice I have a choice of three separate fonts: Neo Sans Intel, Neo Sans Intel Medium, and Neo Sans Intel Light. For each of those three, the italic version of the font (from the separate TTF file) is used. I can tell by the tail on the 'f' character. For bold text, however, an 'emboldening' algorithm seems to be used instead of using the appropriate separate font file. In GNOME font selection dialogs, I see just one 'Neo Sans Intel' family, with a choice of 8 styles. I'll ignore the italic versions since those do actually seem to work as expected, so there are four weights listed: - Light (== Neo Sans Intel Light) - Regular (== Neo Sans Intel Medium) - Medium (== Neo Sans Intel Medium) - Bold (== Neo Sans Intel Medium + emboldening algorithm?) I *don't* seem to have an option in GNOME which will just use the straight 'Neo Sans Intel' font. So both seem to be getting it wrong, in different ways. Or perhaps there's something wrong with the fonts themselves? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 1056845] New: some packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '14

14 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056845 Bug ID: 1056845 Summary: some packaging issues Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: smc-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: pnemade(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nav007(a)gmail.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Looks like when 6.0 update got pushed it was not cleanly packaged. The issues in current spec I see are 1) rpmlint *.rpm smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation smc-dyuthi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation smc-kalyani-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation smc-meera-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/smc-meera-fonts/COPYING smc-rachana-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/smc-rachana-fonts/LICENSE smc-rachana-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/smc-rachana-fonts/COPYING smc-raghumalayalam-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation smc-suruma-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. => Fix rpmlint warnings. There are documentation files also available for other packages which says "no-documentation". Add those files. 2) Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define fontname smc, %define common_desc The SMC Fonts package contains fonts for the display oftraditional and new Malayalam Script. 3) Every patch should provide reference for what purpose its used with related bug link 4) Group tag is now optional and can be removed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): smc-fonts-6.0-2.fc20.src.rpm How reproducible: always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Rn9zSccoSv&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Bug 922357] New: [abrt] fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18: glyphmatches: Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '14

05 Feb '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922357 Bug ID: 922357 Summary: [abrt] fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18: glyphmatches: Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: fontforge Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com Reporter: magicant.starmen(a)nifty.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com Description of problem: FontForge crashed when I tried to create a TTC file, merging four large Japanese fonts. I selected "File" -> "Generate TTC" and clicked "Save." Then FontForge freezed for a few seconds and crashed. It left an empty (zero-byte) TTC file as output. Version-Release number of selected component: fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18 Additional info: backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: fontforge meiryo001x.ttf meiryo002x.ttf meiryo003x.ttf meiryo004x.ttf crash_function: glyphmatches executable: /usr/bin/fontforge kernel: 3.8.2-206.fc18.x86_64 uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 glyphmatches at tottf.c:6454 #2 hashglyphfound at tottf.c:6486 #3 ttc_prep at tottf.c:6621 #4 WriteTTC at tottf.c:7073 #5 DoSave at savefontdlg.c:1587 #6 GFD_exists at savefontdlg.c:1631 #7 _gio_file_statfile at giofile.c:184 #8 _GIO_localDispatch at giofile.c:237 #9 _GFD_SaveOk at savefontdlg.c:1668 #10 GFD_SaveOk at savefontdlg.c:1679 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XgiD0GBOMq&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 2

[Bug 1013269] New: [ml_IN] Waste glyphs in Lohit Malayalam font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '14

05 Feb '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013269 Bug ID: 1013269 Summary: [ml_IN] Waste glyphs in Lohit Malayalam font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com In Lohit Malayalam (current git head as of reporting date), there are waste square box (notdef) glyphs in the following glyph positions: 0x79-0x7e, 0x80, 0x84, 0x85, 0x88. Please remove them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CvM3qYQTgH&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Bug 1056029] New: Fontconfig and summary required fixes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056029 Bug ID: 1056029 Summary: Fontconfig and summary required fixes Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: google-crosextra-caladea-fonts Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Description of problem: This is not a sans-serif fonts. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): google-crosextra-caladea-fonts-1.002-0.2.20130214 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Apply fonts to any text. There is serif with each glyph. 2. Open /usr/share/fonts/google-crosextra-caladea/Caladea-Regular.ttf in fontforge 3. Element->Fontinfo-> OS/2 (PFM Value) Actual results: its listed as a sans-serif Expected results: it should be serif Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fyq7lX6MWM&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Bug 1014065] New: non-free trademark problem
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '14

28 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014065 Bug ID: 1014065 Summary: non-free trademark problem Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: ubuntu-title-fonts Assignee: paul(a)frixxon.co.uk Reporter: kame55-itasenpara123(a)y2.dion.ne.jp QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk Hello. ubuntu-title-fonts is trademark problem. Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009998#c3 details. I think that this package be affected by bug#1009998. Suggests: 1. Change package name. 2. Remove fedora repo. 3. contact trademark owner. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H3Mo9s4vmJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Bug 1050805] Review Request: glyphicons-halflings-fonts - Precisely prepared monochromatic icons and symbols
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '14

28 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805 --- Comment #2 from Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> --- The licensing statement seems clear to me, but I will ask upstream to make sure they are happy with the situation. I'll work on 2,3,4. On the source, I don't want to pull in the whole bootstrap tarball, but it would probably better to pull in based on commit hash instead of tag. Thanks for helping things along, Petr. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GowVcqDWvd&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1050805] Review Request: glyphicons-halflings-fonts - Precisely prepared monochromatic icons and symbols
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '14

28 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050805 Petr Vobornik <pvoborni(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvoborni(a)redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Petr Vobornik <pvoborni(a)redhat.com> --- Some comments (not a proper review): 1. the license is probably not MIT. Bootstrap 3 is under MIT, but Bootstrap has special permission from Glyphicons author to include it, see http://glyphicons.com/license/ Not sure if this is a show-stopper. 2. the only allowed font formats in Fedora are ttf and otf 3. use ttembed tool to change TTF format's embeddable permission to 'installable', otherwise it won't be usable in Internet Explorer (when used on web) 4. font config file is missing 5. I think better source would be https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/archive/v3.0.3.tar.gz For #2 and #3 check this thread: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/192518.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OQ40GBetLk&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2014