Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872
Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN
data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: qt
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, than(a)redhat.com,
kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, ltinkl(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 182235,473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe
CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license
This data is embeded in many packages, including yours
Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
package
FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side
See also
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094779
Bug ID: 1094779
Summary: No Cyrillic Italic Glyphs for Sans, Sans Narrow and
Mono
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
It's wrong for Liberation Sans, Sans Narrow and Mono to have specific italic
glyphs in the Cyrillic range provided that the Latin range has slanted glyphs.
For the sake of consistency, slanted glyphs should be implemented in the
Cyrillic range too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k7Die5I6Dr&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096336
Bug ID: 1096336
Summary: Liberation 2.00.x missing unicode hyphen (U+2010)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: elbart(a)gmx.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The liberation-fonts 2.00.0 and 2.00.1 are missing the unicode hyphen (U+2010).
Versions 1.07.4 and older have that glyph.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.00.1
The regressing commit is
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/liberation-fonts.git/commit/?id=5feb93675…
(slow!)
प्रविण सातपुते "sfd file converted from ttf"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N1bvIUoqeP&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084493
Bug ID: 1084493
Summary: Missing MIDDLE DOT (u+00B7) glyph for Liberation Sans
Italic
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jmontane(a)softcatala.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 882714
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=882714&action=edit
Screenshot showing the bug
Description of problem:
In Windows, there is no glyph for MIDDLE DOT (U+00B7) when using Liberation
Sans Italic, an empty space is showed.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.00.1
How reproducible:
Install Liberation Sans Italic files in a Windows machine (tested in Windows 7
32 and 64 bits). The esay way is installing LibreOffice 4.2, :)
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open a new document LibreOffice Writer
2. Type "cel·la" (cell) "·" is U+00B7
3. Select "cel·la" text and set format as "Libreration Sans, Italic".
Actual results:
4.- "cel la" is showed in italics,you can copy and paste and set other font.
Expected results:
5.- "cel·la"
Additional info:
U+00B7 is a used character for Catalan text. So, please, fix this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1MRhFWVfJa&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072095
Bug ID: 1072095
Summary: Liberation Sans renders most Latin combining
characters incorrectly
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 870161
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=870161&action=edit
Comparison between Helvetica, Arimo, and Liberation Sans
Description of problem:
Liberation Sans renders most Latin Unicode combining characters incorrectly.
These are the diacritics and tie characters in the Unicode range U+0300 to
U+FE2F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combining_character) In particular:
1. The diacritics do not take into account the width or height of the paired
character (which I imagine is a kerning issue)
2. Tie characters are always positioned incorrectly. They are supposed to
visually tie two characters together, but in Liberation Sans they are simply
centered under the 2nd character.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
version 2.00.1
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Liberation Sans
2. Go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaldari/Font_test
Actual results:
Diacritics and ties are a mess.
Expected results:
See Helvetica example in attached file.
Additional info:
The best way to understand this bug is to look at the attached file
(comparison.png).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xTTdgh7sKr&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088033
Bug ID: 1088033
Summary: Text Figures for Liberation Fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Hello Pravin,
I was wondering whether you might consider adding text figures to your fonts.
That'd be great and I don't think it'll take you long.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tODxrdeHtL&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090631
Bug ID: 1090631
Summary: Please set TT_NAME_ID_PREFERRED_FAMILY for Liberation
fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rhughes(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
At the moment the TT_NAME_ID_PREFERRED_FAMILY is not set on any of the
Liberation fonts. As I understand it, TT_NAME_ID_PREFERRED_FAMILY is supposed
to be the same for all files in the same high-level family, and this seems to
be what most other fonts do in Linux. For the next release could you please set
the PreferredFamily key to just "Liberation" in all 10 files. This allows
component installers like gnome-software to group the fonts together rather
than showing them as separate entries and should have no other effects.
Thanks,
Richard.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Zd611y9wUR&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Bug ID: 1009650
Summary: Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Hello,
I have a problem with Italic DE and GE: when I copy them from a pdf produced by
XeLaTeX, they are pasted respectively as Latin G and I WITH MACRON. I'm
puzzled, why does this happen?
By the way, other Serbian glyphs aren't copied at all, but they told me this is
XeLaTeX's fault, not font-dependent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WUlCWOjbqa&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013949
Bug ID: 1013949
Summary: Problematic shapes for some letters of the macedonian
alphabet.
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: liberation-fonts
Severity: high
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pvelkovski(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 805748
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=805748&action=edit
Shoes how the letters look like, and what they should look like.
Description of problem:
The shape of the Regular (Normal) "Cyrillic
macedonian small letter be" looks. It looks like the italic form minus the
slant which is wrong!
Also the letters "macedonian cyrilic ghe" and "macedonian cyrillic gje" look
inconsistent in italic form. The "macedonian cyrilic gje" should look same as
"macedonian cyrilic ghe" with an added accent.
I'm attaching a pdf file that should explain the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UhMfVgfR8e&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014357
Bug ID: 1014357
Summary: U+266B incorrect glyph with extra beam
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fabian+redhat(a)greffrath.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Originally reported as Debian #724839 [1] by Drake Wilson:
"
Using gucharmap 1:3.8.2-2 to view Liberation Serif characters with "Show only
glyphs from this font" enabled, the glyph for U+266B BEAMED EIGHTH NOTES shows
what is clearly beamed sixteenth notes instead; it should have only one beam
rather than two. FontForge confirms this after opening
LiberationSerif-Regular.ttf with SHA-256 =
ea76595ed32ec4bb117fc715e393b4cca3d42cabe53101baec6bbbeb800fa26a.
The glyph for U+266C BEAMED SIXTEENTH NOTES is correct.
"
The bug has been reported against version 2.00.1, ut I have checked with 1.07.3
and it is also present in this version.
Best regards,
Fabian
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724839
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hFqMLHng7w&a=cc_unsubscribe