June 2014 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- A quick look into given spec link issues 1, 2 fixed issue 3 fixed but you need to add changelog entry with every update and write lines there about what has changed from last release. For the new package you can add changelog like * Sat Jun 28 2014 Cheng-Chia Tseng <pswo10680(a)gmail.com> - 0.2-2 - fixed issues reported in package review issue 4, you have not replied whether you want this package only for Fedora or you also want this package in el6 or epel7 remove un-necessary comment lines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hFO9VinDjh&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #5 from Cheng-Chia Tseng <pswo10680(a)gmail.com> --- OK, I have corrected those issues you mentioned and re-uploaded to my fedorapeople space. Release tag number is updated too. Spec URL: http://zerng07.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/cwtex-q-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://zerng07.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/cwtex-q-fonts-0.2-2.fc20.src.rpm Thanks a lot! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4WKGXmTd42&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- rpmlint on source and binary rpms gave cwtex-q-fangsong-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cwtex-q-fangsong-fonts/license.txt cwtex-q-fonts.src:37: W: macro-in-comment %package cwtex-q-fonts.src:41: W: macro-in-comment %description cwtex-q-fonts.src:42: W: macro-in-comment %common_desc cwtex-q-fonts.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{name} cwtex-q-fonts.src:50: W: macro-in-comment %{name} cwtex-q-fonts.src:50: W: macro-in-comment %{version} cwtex-q-fonts.src:50: W: macro-in-comment %{release} cwtex-q-fonts.src:64: W: macro-in-comment %{name} cwtex-q-fonts.src:64: W: macro-in-comment %{version} cwtex-q-fonts.src:64: W: macro-in-comment %{release} cwtex-q-fonts.src:78: W: macro-in-comment %{name} cwtex-q-fonts.src:78: W: macro-in-comment %{version} cwtex-q-fonts.src:78: W: macro-in-comment %{release} cwtex-q-fonts.src:92: W: macro-in-comment %{name} cwtex-q-fonts.src:92: W: macro-in-comment %{version} cwtex-q-fonts.src:92: W: macro-in-comment %{release} cwtex-q-fonts.src:106: W: macro-in-comment %{name} cwtex-q-fonts.src:106: W: macro-in-comment %{version} cwtex-q-fonts.src:106: W: macro-in-comment %{release} cwtex-q-fonts.src:159: W: macro-in-comment %files cwtex-q-fonts.src:160: W: macro-in-comment %defattr cwtex-q-fonts.src:161: W: macro-in-comment %doc cwtex-q-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: cwtex-q-fonts-v02-1.tar.xz cwtex-q-hei-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cwtex-q-hei-fonts/license.txt cwtex-q-kai-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cwtex-q-kai-fonts/license.txt cwtex-q-ming-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cwtex-q-ming-fonts/license.txt cwtex-q-yuan-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yaun -> yuan, yarn, faun cwtex-q-yuan-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cwtex-q-yuan-fonts/license.txt 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 29 warnings. ==> Fix for above issues are as 1) when writing macros in comments always add extra % so %{name} should be %%{name} 2) wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding messages, fix this by using https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#w... 3) In the changelog you don't need dist tag i.e. change 0.2-1%{?dist} to 0.2-1 4) For fedora packaging only you don't need now a) removal of buildroot in %install b) %clean section See more about this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#.25clean and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag I did not like the -common for just few (here 2) files which becomes one more dependent package for all other fonts subpackages. So, decide if you want to keep -common in your package then enable lines in comments else remove lines with comments. Note with every update to package you should increase release tag number by 1 and submit new package for further review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u80YKWYVDz&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1097985] Rename Request: naver-nanum-fonts - Nanum family of Korean TrueType fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097985 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- Review: + mock build is successful for rawhide + rpmlint output on rpms gave naver-nanum-barun-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation naver-nanum-brush-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation naver-nanum-fonts.src:30: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 30, tab: line 10) naver-nanum-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation naver-nanum-myeongjo-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation naver-nanum-pen-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. ==> OK but good to fix mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm tarball : 1ef5eb377e12ce1f4fc78eaff28858ded22ddcc5e01265458f14429abec53fc3 upstream tarball : 1ef5eb377e12ce1f4fc78eaff28858ded22ddcc5e01265458f14429abec53fc3 + License "OFL" is valid and included in source files. + rest looks following packaging guidelines Suggestions: 1) Group tag can be removed for Fedora spec APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=elFCQaaWEL&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #3 from Cheng-Chia Tseng <pswo10680(a)gmail.com> --- Thank you for your informaiton about sponsorship process! :) I haven't read that before, and haven't started reviewing other new packages yet. However, I will follow those instructions to get well prepared! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dJzkEVUx6H&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- Let me see if I can find some time here but before that I see you need sponsorship. Have you started reviewing other new packages? If yes please provide here links to your package reviews. If you are not knowing about sponsorship process then please have a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Look for new packages at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html you may also find following links interested to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aFombpwPH7&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 22621] New: RFE: Add font autoinstallation support

by bugzilla-daemon＠webkit.org

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22621 Summary: RFE: Add font autoinstallation support Product: WebKit Version: 528+ (Nightly build) Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: Enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Text AssignedTo: webkit-unassigned(a)lists.webkit.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com The Linux platform is gaining an on-demand font autoinstallation framework (BSD and Solaris will probably follow eventually). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation Webkit browsers should be plugged into it and use it to request the fonts the pages they render need. This would have a huge user impact, especially for pages that have strong i18n constrains. Unlike proposals such as @font-face and EOT the fonts are sourced from trusted user-controlled sources, are properly vetted legal-side, use the latest font versions not old obsolete ones (with bug fixes), and are installed system-wide where other apps can take advantage of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

9 years, 10 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1081782] Review Request: astloch-fonts - Astloch fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081782 --- Comment #9 from Julien Enselme <jujens(a)jujens.eu> --- Can I have new feedback on this please? I would like to end this package before continuing packaging the other fonts in order to avoid making the same mistakes twice. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gvmnmtkEGG&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #63 from Eric Renfro <psi-jack(a)linux-help.org> --- (In reply to Eric Renfro from comment #62) > Is this bug not going to get fixed in the actual reported version of Fedora > it's broken in? I mean.. It broke from an update in F20, and is still broke today, yet this ticket is closed as if it's only going into rawhide for f21. So this is a bit concerning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9GbSufIVjg&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 921706] ghostscript: /invalidfont in /findfont, --nostringval-- Helvetica

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921706 --- Comment #62 from Eric Renfro <psi-jack(a)linux-help.org> --- Is this bug not going to get fixed in the actual reported version of Fedora it's broken in? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=g3RLuQGHqV&a=cc_unsubscribe

9 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs June 2014