fonts-bugs February 2015

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
355 discussions

[Bug 1187528] [gnome-terminal] blurred rendering of PCF fonts after update of fontconfig
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187528 --- Comment #6 from Joachim Frieben <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> --- (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #5) Enabling 70-yes-bitmaps.conf by setting <patelt name="scalable"><bool>true</bool></patelt> does not make any difference. I do not understand your reasoning on the handling of fonts: the chosen bitmap font is being used but the rendering is incorrect. There is no issue of erroneously giving preference of another font over the desired one. The reported issue appears to be related of a wrong scaling of the chosen bitmap font. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aeku9r9p07&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1187528] [gnome-terminal] blurred rendering of PCF fonts after update of fontconfig
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187528 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- If it looks good on gnome-font-viewer, the font actually used for rendering on apps where you are seeing a problem may be different to what you expected because gnome-font-viewer disables the fallback on selecting a better font in pango. What exactly a font used in pango is hard to see at this moment. just checking the result of fc-match isn't necessarily correct to report the details. The difference between f22's and f21's related to this I think is, there are the change in scoring a font for bitmap and outline which prefer an outline font rather than bitmap until then, which was a bug. though the behavior looks opposed to that. I'm not sure if it makes any difference, how about enabling 70-yes-bitmaps.conf? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IFsLMK0GFM&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1171756] New: urw-fonts-1.10-1.fc22 blocks sendmail to build
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171756 Bug ID: 1171756 Summary: urw-fonts-1.10-1.fc22 blocks sendmail to build Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: urw-fonts Assignee: than(a)redhat.com Reporter: jskarvad(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, than(a)redhat.com Description of problem: New urw-fonts blocks sendmail to build. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): urw-fonts-1.10-1.fc22 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Rebuilt sendmail or just cd into sendmail/doc/op and run 'ps2pdf op.ps' Actual results: ps2pdf op.ps op.pdf Error: /invalidfont in /findfont Operand stack: Times-Italic@0 --nostringval-- Times-Italic Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false Dictionary stack: --dict:1182/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:78/200(L)-- --dict:59/120(L)-- Expected results: No error Additional info: Sendmail is probably not the only package broken, I also know about bug 1142817. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0yqExuaP95&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 9

[Bug 525866] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonttools AssignedTo: roozbeh(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, roozbeh(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license Please rebuild the Fedora fonttool using those resources (packaged separately as they can be used by other packages) FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 1187337] Review Request: sil-coval-fonts - font derived from sans-serif
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Feb '15

01 Feb '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187337 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- Quick comment: Font packages need some time to get reviewed for things which fedora-review tool not provide as checklist. I will review this in next 2 days. Meantime do some package reviews. I think easiest way to use fedora-review tool is to get that package from latest comment where package links exists from bugzilla using fedora-review -b 1187337 --mock-config fedora-rawhide-x86_64 You may want to fill all the markings to each checklist item for every review you post to other packages also. See the Legend at top of review text. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j3St8qnJ57&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs February 2015