January 2016 - fonts-bugs - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 1261022] New: .eot, .svg and .woff files missing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261022 Bug ID: 1261022 Summary: .eot, .svg and .woff files missing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: google-roboto-fonts Assignee: dtardon(a)redhat.com Reporter: mrunge(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dtardon(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: I would need those files for a requirement in OpenStack Dashboard. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IJZrOQWHi9&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 4

[Bug 1285705] New: new version of Overpass Fonts available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285705 Bug ID: 1285705 Summary: new version of Overpass Fonts available Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: overpass-fonts Keywords: i18n Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, oliver(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, qe-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, tcallawa(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1284772 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1284772 +++ Could we get a update to the overpass-fonts package to incorporate (hinting): https://github.com/RedHatBrand/overpass/commit/4458bf24ee2365b539a11eff529a… This should improve the readability of the font. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284772 [Bug 1284772] new version of Overpass Fonts available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gdKkoN3Wh5&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Bug 1246597] New: Update to 2.010 (with 1.030 italics)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Oct '16

03 Oct '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246597 Bug ID: 1246597 Summary: Update to 2.010 (with 1.030 italics) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts Assignee: mattrose(a)folkwolf.net Reporter: suraia(a)ikkoku.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mattrose(a)folkwolf.net, me(a)ibotty.net Created attachment 1055825 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1055825&action=edit Update to 2.010 (with 1.030 italics) A new upstream release is available: 2.010 (with 1.030 italics) The attached patch updates the package to this new version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=B3SLVFNiqM&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Bug 1207607] New: Coordinate with ghostscript for upgrade to new font names
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Sep '16

29 Sep '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207607 Bug ID: 1207607 Summary: Coordinate with ghostscript for upgrade to new font names Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: urw-fonts Assignee: than(a)redhat.com Reporter: twaugh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, than(a)redhat.com It looks like bug #1207577 is caused by us packaging urw-fonts separately from ghostscript. As the names of the fonts have changed, we'll need to coordinate when switching over to the new names. For the moment I'll just switch ghostscript back to using the old names. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yti4v1Y7VK&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 1

[Bug 1295169] New: fontmatrix included non-free content.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Aug '16

27 Aug '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295169 Bug ID: 1295169 Summary: fontmatrix included non-free content. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontmatrix Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: kame55-itasenpara123(a)y2.dion.ne.jp QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: Debian BTS 787350 Hello. fontmatrix included non-free code, Please see Debuan bug number "787350" datails. I think that this package be affected by debian bug number "787350". and, "fontmatrix-0.9.99-Source/src/icons/action-copy-char.svg" license is CC-BY-SA. I suggests that resolve license problem and add license tag. Thanks. Reference: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=787350 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MUTNxxO9Kb&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 13

[Bug 606217] New: Eccentric glyph for the lowercase Greek gamma letter (=?UTF-8?Q?=CE=B3?=)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Eccentric glyph for the lowercase Greek gamma letter (γ) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606217 Summary: Eccentric glyph for the lowercase Greek gamma letter (γ) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: discon(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The liberation fonts have a strange glyph for the lowercase Greek gamma letter whenever hinting is on. The hinting makes the glyph look similar to the 'y' letter (the bottom part tends towards left). This looks weird and is unique on this font family, AFAIK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 1228872] New: ttfcoverage from repo-font-audit crashes when checking Unicode 7.x fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228872 Bug ID: 1228872 Summary: ttfcoverage from repo-font-audit crashes when checking Unicode 7.x fonts Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: fontpackages Severity: low Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: alex.ploumistos(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tagoh(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: CPAN 85014 External Bug ID: CPAN 85014 ttfcoverage is probably not up to the Unicode 7.x specs, so when it comes across such fonts, it fails with a message like this one: Illegal division by zero at /usr/bin/ttfcoverage line 42. /usr/share/fontpackages/repo-font-audit.mk:56: recipe for target 'tmp/usr/share/fonts/gdouros-symbola/Symbola.ttf.rfo.unicover' failed make[1]: *** [tmp/usr/share/fonts/gdouros-symbola/Symbola.ttf.rfo.unicover] Error 255 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/share/fontpackages/repo-font-audit.mk:36: recipe for target 'gdouros-symbola-fonts-0_7.21-0.3.20150430.fc21.noarch/' failed make: *** [gdouros-symbola-fonts-0_7.21-0.3.20150430.fc21.noarch/] Error 2 mv: cannot move ‘./gdouros-symbola-fonts-0_7.21-0.3.20150430.fc21.noarch/tmp/usr/share/fonts/gdouros-symbola/Symbola.ttf.rfo.fontlint’ to ‘../data/gdouros-symbola-fonts-0_7.21-0.3.20150430.fc21.noarch/usr_share_fonts_gdouros-symbola_Symbola.ttf.fontlint.txt’: No such file or directory Nothing is logged anywhere when this occurs. The only other reference to this I could find was on CPAN's bugtracker, but it's not that useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H8Gnge9tF1&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 1

[Bug 1228870] New: repo-font-audit doesn't know about xml metadata files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228870 Bug ID: 1228870 Summary: repo-font-audit doesn't know about xml metadata files Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: fontpackages Severity: low Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: alex.ploumistos(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tagoh(a)redhat.com When font packages that contain xml metadata files are checked with repo-font-audit, it throws the following error: fonts in packages that contain non-font data Since xml metadata files are now required for font packages, the script should be updated to recognize them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=84GPn6G62c&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 1

[Bug 1179691] New: Bold lower-case letter "s" looks in some cases too thin with Medium+ hinting
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179691 Bug ID: 1179691 Summary: Bold lower-case letter "s" looks in some cases too thin with Medium+ hinting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: liberation-fonts Severity: low Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: michal.nowak(a)resist.ca QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 977206 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=977206&action=edit Lower-case "s" too thin on Full hinting Description of problem: Bold lower-case letter "s" in serif looks in some cases too thin with Medium and Full hinting, but look OK with hinting set to Slight or None. See attached screenshots from LO Writer from F21. See the "s" in a word "Midas" and "asked". It's 12 pt Liberation Serif, bold, paper is enlarged to 157 % of width of A4 paper. When the zoom ratio gets higher, the problem disappears, when zoomed out it's worse (but less visible). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-serif-fonts-1.07.4-4.fc21.noarch freetype-2.5.3-13.fc21.x86_64 libreoffice-core-4.3.5.2-4.fc21.x86_64 How reproducible: Always. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IG83soyygr&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

[Bug 1187678] New: RFC: Please give feedback about a compat stix-fonts 1.0.0
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187678 Bug ID: 1187678 Summary: RFC: Please give feedback about a compat stix-fonts 1.0.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: stix-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk I understand that to certain extent, this is kind of a revive of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885307 I made a tentative alternative, to handle https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/381 But the above is already quite old, but latest matplotlib still relies on its bundled stix-fonts-1.0.0 Instead of compat-stix-fonts it could be named something else including 1-0 or 1_0 in the name, in case stix-fonts is updated to the now available 2.0 version. This package at first would be used only by python-matplotlib and would remove the need of bundling the stix 1.0 fonts. Spec URL: https://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/compat-stix-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/compat-stix-fonts-1.0.0-1.el7.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PhtXAJgbtB&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 1

[Bug 1084228] New: Hinting for Liberation Sans inferior at small font size
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084228 Bug ID: 1084228 Summary: Hinting for Liberation Sans inferior at small font size Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: Eduard.Braun2(a)gmx.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 882473 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=882473&action=edit testcase with the problematic font charakteristics Wikipedia recently switched to a predefined CSS font stack for body font so even Windows users will be served with Liberation Sans if installed (e.g. because it is distributed with Libre Office). This made apparent inferior hinting of Liberation Sans with bold weight when rendered at the specific size of 0.875em (the font size used in MediaWiki's vector skin). Most notable "e"s have a very thick lower curve while the upper curve is much too thin. This also applies for variants like "è é ê ë". Funnily not for "œ æ" though which is rendered differently. Also notable is e.g. "s" which has thick upper/lower curves but is thin in the middle. A testcase with the described font characteristics set is attached. The screenshot shows the rendering in Firefox. The screenshot was created with Firefox 28.0 on Windows 7. The installed version of the Liberation fonts is 2.00.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=te4zKki7hK&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 11

[Bug 1068918] New: Google Droid Sans font is displayed as [unknown] and [monotype], it breaks GTK+ apps view in KDE
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068918 Bug ID: 1068918 Summary: Google Droid Sans font is displayed as [unknown] and [monotype], it breaks GTK+ apps view in KDE Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: google-droid-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: carasin.berlogue(a)mail.ru QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hobbes1069(a)gmail.com, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 963502 Description of problem: > [google-droid-sans-fonts] package is broken since F18. I want to select 'Droid Sans' font for KDE UI, but this font is displayed twice at [systemsettings]: with [unknown] and [monotype] suffixes. If I apply anyone of them, only KDE/Qt apps use 'Droid Sans' font, but GTK2/GTK3 apps use the defaul font (DejaVu Sans). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-6.fc20.noarch How reproducible: > Always. Steps to Reproduce: > 1. [yum install google-droid-sans-fonts]; 2. start KDE session; 3. launch <select UI fonts> dialog at [systemsettings]; 4. 'Droid Sans' font is displayed twice: with [unknown] and [monotype] suffixes; 5. select and apply anyone — 'Droid Sans [unknown]' or 'Droid Sans [monotype]'; 6. KDE/Qt apps use the Droid Sans font, but GTK2/GTK3 apps use the defaul font (DejaVu Sans). Actual results: > 'Droid Sans' font is not applied for GTK2/GTK3 apps. This font is displayed twice at [systemsettings]: with [unknown] and [monotype] suffixes. Expected results: > 'Droid Sans' font is applied for all the apps. This font is displayed once at [systemsettings] — without any suffix. Additional info: > This bug is several years old. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963502#c1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EIzrPE5DPR&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Bug 1273554] New: Too high mono font; please, upgrade to the latest upstream
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '16

29 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273554 Bug ID: 1273554 Summary: Too high mono font; please, upgrade to the latest upstream Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: mozilla-fira-fonts Assignee: relrod(a)redhat.com Reporter: mcepl(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, relrod(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1084829 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1084829&action=edit Screenshot of the situation Description of problem: The current version of the Mozilla Fira Mono is too high, so it makes it hard to use it. When using the font from the upstream the situation is a way better. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mozilla-fira-fonts-3.111-3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0Spm3ewX8y&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 21

[Bug 1169979] New: Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jun '16

10 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169979 Bug ID: 1169979 Summary: Some fonts not in fontconfig cache on Fedora 21 live images Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: awilliam(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com We've spotted an issue with Fedora 21 live images where some installed fonts appear to be missing from the fontconfig cache in the live environment. An 'fc-cache -f' fixes this. For instance, on the Fedora 21 Final RC2 Workstation x86_64 live: [root@localhost liveuser]# fc-list | wc -l 141 [root@localhost liveuser]# fc-cache --force [root@localhost liveuser]# fc-list | wc -l 159 The specific fonts that are missing on that image are: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Bold Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Bold /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Book /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-BoldItalic.ttf: DejaVu Serif:style=Bold Italic /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Bold.ttf: DejaVu Serif:style=Bold /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf: DejaVu Serif,DejaVu Serif Condensed:style=Condensed Bold Italic,Bold Italic /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed.ttf: DejaVu Serif,DejaVu Serif Condensed:style=Condensed,Book /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf: DejaVu Serif:style=Italic /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif.ttf: DejaVu Serif:style=Book /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTagalog-Regular.ttf: Noto Sans Tagalog:style=Regular /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTaiViet-Regular.ttf: Noto Sans Tai Viet:style=Regular /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSerif-BoldItalic.ttf: Liberation Serif:style=Bold Italic /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSerif-Bold.ttf: Liberation Serif:style=Bold /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSerif-Italic.ttf: Liberation Serif:style=Italic /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSerif-Regular.ttf: Liberation Serif:style=Regular The log of the compose is here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5463/8275463/root.log In comparison, the i686 Workstation live is 'missing' only /usr/share/fonts/google-noto/NotoSansTaiViet-Regular.ttf: Noto Sans Tai Viet:style=Regular its compose log is here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5460/8275460/root.log to me, it appears the affected cases are ones where more than one package contains fonts in the same directory, for packages installed *after* the fontconfig package. The fontconfig package has an 'fc-cache -f' in its %post, so any inconsistencies that exist before it's installed get fixed by that. My first thesis was 'for any given directory, only fonts from the first package installed after fontconfig will make it to the cache, fonts in the same directory from subsequently-installed packages won't be added'. But it doesn't seem to be that simple, because some fonts in /usr/share/fonts/google-noto *are* added - the first 'noto' package installed is google-noto-sans-lisu-fonts , and after that several more noto packages are installed. The fonts from google-noto-sans-mandaic-fonts, google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-fonts , and google-noto-sans-tai-tham-fonts *do* get added to the cache - but the fonts from google-noto-sans-tagalog-fonts and google-noto-sans-tai-viet-fonts do *not* get added. It's quite odd. This is a fairly bad bug because of its impact on DejaVu Sans Mono: this is the default monospace font for both Workstation and KDE (and I think the non-blocking spins too). Its absence from the cache results in them using Nimbus Mono L as their monospace fonts, which is a pretty crappy font, ugly and hard to read. The workaround is easy once you know it, but if you don't, you just think we have a really bad font. There's an easy big hammer workaround we can use for a quick rebuild of the RC2 lives, if we like: --- a/fedora-live-base.ks +++ b/fedora-live-base.ks @@ -299,6 +299,12 @@ rm -f /core* # convince readahead not to collect # FIXME: for systemd +# forcibly regenerate fontconfig cache (so long as this live image has +# fontconfig) - see #XXXXXXX +if [ -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ] ; then + fc-cache -f +fi + %end i.e., just do an fc-cache -f at the end of live generation %post. I've tested that locally, and it works, the generated Workstation image has 159 fonts in fc-list (I also generated an image with the exact same config and build host, but no change to spin-kickstarts, to verify that it reproduced the bug, and it does). The real fix should likely be in fc-cache, but the spin-kickstarts workaround would solve this problem for F21. I think fc-cache's behaviour must have changed between F20 and F21, as F20 doesn't appear to be affected by this at all, at least not the x86_64 desktop live. All F21 images I've tested seem to be affected to some extent, though the exact affected fonts vary depending on the package install order that yum decided on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YTmueYxE1e&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 26

[Bug 527740] New: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 May '16

30 May '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527740 Summary: [ml_IN] Applying Backspace to a chillu conjunct followed by punctuation/SPACE results in deletion of the chillu also Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, smc-discuss(a)googlegroups.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=363982) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363982) Screenshot for chillu conjuncts Description of problem: When chillu conjuncts are followed by any punctuation marks like "!", ".", ",", "'", "?" or SPACE, ie when a word ends with a chillu conjunct, and followed by a punctuation mark or a SPACE, using Backspace to delete the punctuation mark or SPACE results in the deletion of chillu conjunct together with the punctuation mark/SPACE. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango 1.26.0-1.fc12 i686 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit 2. type any of chillu conjunct, eg: 0D28, 0D4D, 200D OR type a word ending with chillu conjunct, eg: 0D05, 0D35, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D 3. type any punctuation marks like "!", ".", ",", "'", "?" or SPACE 4. Press Backspace Actual results: When using Backspace after chillu conjunct followed by punctuation mark or SPACE, instead of deleting punctuation mark or SPACE only, the chillu conjunct also gets deleted. Expected results: When using Backspace after chillu conjunct followed by punctuation mark or SPACE, only the punctuation mark/SPACE should get deleted. Additional info: 1. This does not happen when chillu comes in between a word. eg: നന്‍മ (0D28, 0D28, 0D4D, 200D, 0D2E) 2. This issue is not present in oowriter and kwrite. When above steps are reproduced, deletions happens in correct order. Versions used: libicu-4.2.1-6.fc12 i686 qt-4.5.2-22.fc12 i686 3. Screenshot attached for chillu conjuncts and eg of words with chillu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 1269404] New: Update with latest upstream release with split tarballs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '16

07 May '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269404 Bug ID: 1269404 Summary: Update with latest upstream release with split tarballs Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: google-noto-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Ref: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/issues/161 Dear Fedora maintainers, currently, this page: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/google-noto-fonts/overview/ lists the following as project homepage: https://code.google.com/p/noto However, we recently moved from Google Code to GitHub; to cope with size limitations, we split the fonts over multiple repositories. The new locations are here: https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-cjk https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Iwmnhx7uNF&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Bug 1297374] New: after selecting a font for view, the "Sample" tab does not load sample text correctly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Apr '16

23 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297374 Bug ID: 1297374 Summary: after selecting a font for view, the "Sample" tab does not load sample text correctly Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: fontmatrix Severity: medium Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: emily(a)emilytench.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1113570 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1113570&action=edit screenshot showing error state Description of problem: after selecting a font for view, the "Sample" tab does not load sample text correctly - font displays correctly, playground works correctly, but sample text looks like it may be an error message or fragment of code Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontmatrix-0.9.99-22.r1218.fc23 How reproducible: very Steps to Reproduce: 1. open fontmatrix 2. double click any font 3. "Sample" tab is selected by default and shows incorrect sample text Actual results: screenshot included : displays commas, parenthesis, semicolons, etc. Expected results: loading a meaningful sample of glyphs used in font, or text configured in preferences Additional info: I believe this was working properly in previous releases, but I am not 100% certain. The current user id was created as a clean home directory on a new install of Fedora Workstation 23 - so no settings have been carried over in the home directory from other distributions or from previous uses of fontmatrix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sfuQ1w4iO0&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

[Bug 1206752] New: [abrt] fonttools: subset.py:2282:_closure_glyphs:MissingGlyphsSubsettingError: set(['./Apps/msfinal/public/textos/index.html'])
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206752 Bug ID: 1206752 Summary: [abrt] fonttools: subset.py:2282:_closure_glyphs:MissingGlyphsSubsetting Error: set(['./Apps/msfinal/public/textos/index.html']) Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: fonttools Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: diogocamposwd(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component: fonttools-2.5-2.fc22 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.5.0 cmdline: /usr/bin/python2 /usr/bin/pyftsubset ./Downloads/Sintony-Regular.ttf ./Apps/msfinal/public/textos/index.html executable: /usr/bin/pyftsubset kernel: 4.0.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc22.x86_64 runlevel: unknown type: Python uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: #1 _closure_glyphs in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/subset.py:2282 #2 subset in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/subset.py:2387 #3 main in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/subset.py:2602 #4 <module> in /usr/bin/pyftsubset:6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aMgosC2dVM&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

[Bug 1239985] New: sazanami-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Apr '16

15 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239985 Bug ID: 1239985 Summary: sazanami-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: sazanami-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1239338 (F23FTBFS) Your package sazanami-fonts failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10152324 For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239338 [Bug 1239338] Fedora 23 Mass Rebuild FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SRJ3imVFil&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 10

[Bug 1284709] New: fontawesome-fonts-v4.5.0 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Apr '16

13 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284709 Bug ID: 1284709 Summary: fontawesome-fonts-v4.5.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontawesome-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, mrunge(a)redhat.com, pvoborni(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: v4.5.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.4.0-2.fc24 URL: https://github.com/FortAwesome/Font-Awesome Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5UnIPwdZ19&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 15

[Bug 1240265] New: fonttools 2.5 takes too much memory
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Apr '16

13 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240265 Bug ID: 1240265 Summary: fonttools 2.5 takes too much memory Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: fonttools Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Description of problem: related to Bug#1239985, after upgrading fonttools to 2.5, it doesn't work anymore to decompile ttf to ttx. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5-2.fc22 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.ttx -a -i -e sazanami-gothic.ttf 2. 3. Actual results: OOM killer kills the process Expected results: should works as it worked before. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Zdw8HK8hNu&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 12

[Bug 507292] New: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Mar '16

11 Mar '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: rpm AssignedTo: pmatilai(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pmatilai(a)redhat.com, jnovy(a)redhat.com, ffesti(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora (this is mostly a yum-level RFE, but it would be nice if we kept the same depsolving logic in both apps) The problem: Selecting a font is a multi-criterium operation. We need to match on font family, font style, language support, unicode support, etc. At any time all of just some of those selection criterii can be provided by the user or applications. To have features like font auto-installation work reliably, this matching needs to extend to the package database Right now rpm is only allowing to specify atomic provides, so we can have a font package that Provides font(dejavusans) and Provides font(:lang=el) but there is no warranty both those provides are belonging to the same font. There is no way to distinguish between a package that includes an actual greek dejavusans and a package that includes a dejavusans greek-less file and another totally different greek font To workaround this rpm limitation we've been asking packagers to put font files belonging to different font families in different packages. However: 1. many still don't 2. it's not technically possible for all font formats, for example the ttc font format allows mixing of fonts with different characteristics in a single file The ideal solution: Ability to have Provides like: font(comma-separated font name list|comma-separated style list|comma-separated lang list) (rough mockup that probably needs refining) And have deps like (dejavu|*|el) work in rpm (yes a font can declare many different names, be available in many different styles, cover many different languages) For ttc files we'd then generate one Provides for each font included in the ttc bundle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 487070] New: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Mar '16

04 Mar '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861 Alias: CVE-2006-3467 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070 Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861 Product: Security Response Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-20 06-3467 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: impact=moderate,source=rehdat,reported=20060710,public =20060718 Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: vulnerability AssignedTo: security-response-team(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: vdanen(a)redhat.com CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Other Target Release: --- Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2006-3467 to the following vulnerability: Name: CVE-2006-3467 URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3467 Assigned: 20060710 Reference: URL: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/451426/100/200/threaded Reference: MISC: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190593 Integer overflow in FreeType before 2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PCF file, as demonstrated by the Red Hat bad1.pcf test file, due to a partial fix of CVE-2006-1861. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1262377] New: freetype: Infinite loop in parse_encoding in t1load.c
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Mar '16

04 Mar '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262377 Bug ID: 1262377 Summary: freetype: Infinite loop in parse_encoding in t1load.c Product: Security Response Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: amaris(a)redhat.com CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com If the Postscript stream contains a broken number-with-base (e.g. "8#garbage") the cursor doesn't advance and parse_encoding enters an infinite loop. Upstream patch: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/?id=df14e6c0… CVE request: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/537 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iemI0CxmQI&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 15

[Bug 1099033] Review Request: adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts - A set of serif OpenType fonts designed to complement Source Sans Pro
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '16

26 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099033 Michael Kuhn <suraia(a)ikkoku.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |suraia(a)ikkoku.de Resolution|NOTABUG |--- Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #4 from Michael Kuhn <suraia(a)ikkoku.de> --- I am interested in getting this font into Fedora. I have updated the package based on the updates for adobe-source-code-pro-fonts (bug 1246597) and adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts (bug 1246765). Spec URL: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts/adobe-source-serif-p… SRPM URL: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts/adobe-source-serif-p… Description: Source Serif Pro is a set of OpenType fonts to complement the Source Sans Pro family. Fedora Account System Username: suraia -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 800585] CVE-2012-1129 freetype: heap off-by-one buffer underflow in Type42 parser t42_parse_sfnts() (#35602)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '16

26 Jan '16

1 0

[Bug 1296362] New: [Patch] Update to 0.0.20
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jan '16

25 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296362 Bug ID: 1296362 Summary: [Patch] Update to 0.0.20 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: abattis-cantarell-fonts Assignee: ccecchi(a)redhat.com Reporter: suraia(a)ikkoku.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ccecchi(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Created attachment 1112304 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1112304&action=edit Update to 0.0.20 I have updated the Cantarell package to version 0.0.20 locally; feel free to use the attached patch. This version needs a small patch to make the new version work with Fedora's parallel make. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MZBEGa22Wd&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 2

[Bug 1301144] Review Request: horai-ume-fonts - Free Japanese Gothic/Mincho Fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jan '16

25 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144 --- Comment #2 from Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #1) > Use "mplus" for license tag. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Mplus?rd=Licensing/mplus thankyou, somehow I have overlooked this when examining the good licenses list @reviewer: as the review hadn't started yet, I've simply replaced content at spec&srpm url without release increase and changelog entry, just the license field fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1271787] Review Request: comic-neue-fonts - A typeface family inspired by Comic Sans
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '16

23 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271787 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2016-01-23 20:06:28 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1271787] Review Request: comic-neue-fonts - A typeface family inspired by Comic Sans
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '16

23 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271787 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- comic-neue-fonts-2.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1301144] Review Request: horai-ume-fonts - Free Japanese Gothic/Mincho Fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '16

23 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Use "mplus" for license tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Mplus?rd=Licensing/mplus The upstream says the license is the same as mplus: https://osdn.jp/projects/ume-font/lists/archive/info/2009-May/000214.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1278049] New: Default search directories do not include the location of TeX Live fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '16

22 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278049 Bug ID: 1278049 Summary: Default search directories do not include the location of TeX Live fonts Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: dchristidis(a)mykolab.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Beginning with Fedora 23, the OTF files for Computer Modern Unicode are included in texlive-cm-unicode. However, fontconfig is not configured to search the install location by default. Thus, the user is required to perform additional steps to use that font in TeX or other applications. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.11.94-4.fc23.x86_64 texlive-cm-unicode-svn19445.0.7.0-14.fc23.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install texlive-cm-unicode 2. fc-list | grep CMU Actual results: fontconfig does not locate the recently installed fonts. Expected results: After installation, the fonts should be available for use without further actions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=53zwOwA7t3&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 13

[Bug 1301144] Review Request: horai-ume-fonts - Free Japanese Gothic/Mincho Fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '16

22 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144 Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1257496] Fonts are not antialiased in java applications
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '16

12 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257496 Mario Torre <neugens(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed|2015-08-28 08:59:40 |2016-01-12 04:04:48 --- Comment #11 from Mario Torre <neugens(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #10) > I'm not sure why Java prefer non-antialiased font by default. why don't you > change the behavior like others? For compatibility reasons, it is also a better default for connections over SSH. I will speak with the AWT developers and see what they think about changing this default, but I will close this bug for now since, well, it's not exactly a bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a8VEkHsFH5&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477471, which changed state. Bug 477471 Summary: [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=G20kKZ0Qzz&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed|2012-08-16 12:53:03 |2016-01-07 15:58:14 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Removed fonts, still works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2KuRDFPm9T&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1227614] New: Font rendering is poor in Fedora 22
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227614 Bug ID: 1227614 Summary: Font rendering is poor in Fedora 22 Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: freetype Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: sudhir(a)sudhirkhanger.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1034149 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1034149&action=edit screenshot Description of problem: Font rendering on Fedora 21 KDE worked fine. But in Fedora 22 which uses freetype-2.5.5-1.fc22.x86_64 it is way too grainier. I use slight hint which doesn't seem to be applied at all. RPMFusion which uses F21's freetype-freeworld-2.3.11 works fine. So something must have gone wrong in the update. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aU8lA46g7B&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

[Bug 1286714] New: freetype-2.6.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286714 Bug ID: 1286714 Summary: freetype-2.6.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: freetype Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 2.6.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.6.1-1.fc24 URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/freetype/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=98VGhTqyZD&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2016