https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240265
Bug ID: 1240265
Summary: fonttools 2.5 takes too much memory
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: fonttools
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
related to Bug#1239985, after upgrading fonttools to 2.5, it doesn't work
anymore to decompile ttf to ttx.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.5-2.fc22
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.ttx -a -i -e sazanami-gothic.ttf
2.
3.
Actual results:
OOM killer kills the process
Expected results:
should works as it worked before.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Zdw8HK8hNu&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292
Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: rpm
AssignedTo: pmatilai(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pmatilai(a)redhat.com, jnovy(a)redhat.com,
ffesti(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
(this is mostly a yum-level RFE, but it would be nice if we kept the same
depsolving logic in both apps)
The problem:
Selecting a font is a multi-criterium operation. We need to match on font
family, font style, language support, unicode support, etc. At any time all of
just some of those selection criterii can be provided by the user or
applications.
To have features like font auto-installation work reliably, this matching needs
to extend to the package database
Right now rpm is only allowing to specify atomic provides, so we can have a
font package that
Provides font(dejavusans)
and
Provides
font(:lang=el)
but there is no warranty both those provides are belonging to the same font.
There is no way to distinguish between a package that includes an actual greek
dejavusans and a package that includes a dejavusans greek-less file and another
totally different greek font
To workaround this rpm limitation we've been asking packagers to put font files
belonging to different font families in different packages. However:
1. many still don't
2. it's not technically possible for all font formats, for example the ttc font
format allows mixing of fonts with different characteristics in a single file
The ideal solution:
Ability to have Provides like:
font(comma-separated font name list|comma-separated style list|comma-separated
lang list) (rough mockup that probably needs refining)
And have deps like (dejavu|*|el) work in rpm
(yes a font can declare many different names, be available in many different
styles, cover many different languages)
For ttc files we'd then generate one Provides for each font included in the ttc
bundle
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Alias: CVE-2006-3467
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070
Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow
vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Product: Security Response
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-20
06-3467
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: impact=moderate,source=rehdat,reported=20060710,public
=20060718
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: vulnerability
AssignedTo: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: vdanen(a)redhat.com
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Other
Target Release: ---
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2006-3467 to
the following vulnerability:
Name: CVE-2006-3467
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3467
Assigned: 20060710
Reference: URL:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/451426/100/200/threaded
Reference: MISC: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190593
Integer overflow in FreeType before 2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a
denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PCF
file, as demonstrated by the Red Hat
bad1.pcf test file, due to a partial fix of CVE-2006-1861.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099033
Michael Kuhn <suraia(a)ikkoku.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
CC| |suraia(a)ikkoku.de
Resolution|NOTABUG |---
Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #4 from Michael Kuhn <suraia(a)ikkoku.de> ---
I am interested in getting this font into Fedora. I have updated the package
based on the updates for adobe-source-code-pro-fonts (bug 1246597) and
adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts (bug 1246765).
Spec URL:
https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts/adobe-source-serif-p…
SRPM URL:
https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts/adobe-source-serif-p…
Description:
Source Serif Pro is a set of OpenType fonts to complement the Source Sans Pro
family.
Fedora Account System Username: suraia
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800585
Ján Rusnačko <jrusnack(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jrusnack(a)redhat.com
Whiteboard|impact=low,public=20120223, |impact=low,public=20120223,
|reported=20120302,source=cu |reported=20120302,source=cu
|stomer,cvss2=2.6/AV:N/AC:H/ |stomer,cvss2=2.6/AV:N/AC:H/
|Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P,rhel-5/fre |Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P,rhel-5/fre
|etype=affected,rhel-6/freet |etype=affected,rhel-6/freet
|ype=affected,fedora-all/fre |ype=affected,fedora-all/fre
|etype=affected,fedora-all/m |etype=affected,fedora-all/m
|ingw32-freetype=affected |ingw32-freetype=affected,cw
| |e=CWE-193
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296362
Bug ID: 1296362
Summary: [Patch] Update to 0.0.20
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: abattis-cantarell-fonts
Assignee: ccecchi(a)redhat.com
Reporter: suraia(a)ikkoku.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ccecchi(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Created attachment 1112304
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1112304&action=edit
Update to 0.0.20
I have updated the Cantarell package to version 0.0.20 locally; feel free to
use the attached patch. This version needs a small patch to make the new
version work with Fedora's parallel make.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MZBEGa22Wd&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
--- Comment #2 from Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #1)
> Use "mplus" for license tag.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Mplus?rd=Licensing/mplus
thankyou, somehow I have overlooked this when examining the good licenses list
@reviewer: as the review hadn't started yet, I've simply replaced content at
spec&srpm url without release increase and changelog entry, just the license
field fixed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271787
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2016-01-23 20:06:28
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271787
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
comic-neue-fonts-2.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.