[Bug 1278049] New: Default search directories do not include the
location of TeX Live fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278049
Bug ID: 1278049
Summary: Default search directories do not include the location
of TeX Live fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: dchristidis(a)mykolab.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Beginning with Fedora 23, the OTF files for Computer Modern Unicode are
included in texlive-cm-unicode. However, fontconfig is not configured to search
the install location by default. Thus, the user is required to perform
additional steps to use that font in TeX or other applications.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.11.94-4.fc23.x86_64
texlive-cm-unicode-svn19445.0.7.0-14.fc23.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install texlive-cm-unicode
2. fc-list | grep CMU
Actual results:
fontconfig does not locate the recently installed fonts.
Expected results:
After installation, the fonts should be available for use without further
actions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=53zwOwA7t3&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 3 months
[Bug 1257496] Fonts are not antialiased in java applications
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257496
Mario Torre <neugens(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed|2015-08-28 08:59:40 |2016-01-12 04:04:48
--- Comment #11 from Mario Torre <neugens(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #10)
> I'm not sure why Java prefer non-antialiased font by default. why don't you
> change the behavior like others?
For compatibility reasons, it is also a better default for connections over
SSH. I will speak with the AWT developers and see what they think about
changing this default, but I will close this bug for now since, well, it's not
exactly a bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a8VEkHsFH5&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 3 months
[Bug 1227614] New: Font rendering is poor in Fedora 22
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227614
Bug ID: 1227614
Summary: Font rendering is poor in Fedora 22
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: freetype
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: sudhir(a)sudhirkhanger.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1034149
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1034149&action=edit
screenshot
Description of problem:
Font rendering on Fedora 21 KDE worked fine. But in Fedora 22 which uses
freetype-2.5.5-1.fc22.x86_64 it is way too grainier. I use slight hint which
doesn't seem to be applied at all. RPMFusion which uses F21's
freetype-freeworld-2.3.11 works fine. So something must have gone wrong in the
update.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aU8lA46g7B&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 3 months