fonts-bugs January 2016

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
88 discussions

[Bug 1301144] Review Request: horai-ume-fonts - Free Japanese Gothic/Mincho Fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jan '16

23 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Use "mplus" for license tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Mplus?rd=Licensing/mplus The upstream says the license is the same as mplus: https://osdn.jp/projects/ume-font/lists/archive/info/2009-May/000214.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1278049] New: Default search directories do not include the location of TeX Live fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '16

22 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278049 Bug ID: 1278049 Summary: Default search directories do not include the location of TeX Live fonts Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: dchristidis(a)mykolab.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Beginning with Fedora 23, the OTF files for Computer Modern Unicode are included in texlive-cm-unicode. However, fontconfig is not configured to search the install location by default. Thus, the user is required to perform additional steps to use that font in TeX or other applications. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.11.94-4.fc23.x86_64 texlive-cm-unicode-svn19445.0.7.0-14.fc23.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install texlive-cm-unicode 2. fc-list | grep CMU Actual results: fontconfig does not locate the recently installed fonts. Expected results: After installation, the fonts should be available for use without further actions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=53zwOwA7t3&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 13

[Bug 1301144] Review Request: horai-ume-fonts - Free Japanese Gothic/Mincho Fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '16

22 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144 Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1257496] Fonts are not antialiased in java applications
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '16

12 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257496 Mario Torre <neugens(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed|2015-08-28 08:59:40 |2016-01-12 04:04:48 --- Comment #11 from Mario Torre <neugens(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #10) > I'm not sure why Java prefer non-antialiased font by default. why don't you > change the behavior like others? For compatibility reasons, it is also a better default for connections over SSH. I will speak with the AWT developers and see what they think about changing this default, but I will close this bug for now since, well, it's not exactly a bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a8VEkHsFH5&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477471, which changed state. Bug 477471 Summary: [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=G20kKZ0Qzz&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed|2012-08-16 12:53:03 |2016-01-07 15:58:14 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Removed fonts, still works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2KuRDFPm9T&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 1227614] New: Font rendering is poor in Fedora 22
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227614 Bug ID: 1227614 Summary: Font rendering is poor in Fedora 22 Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: freetype Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: sudhir(a)sudhirkhanger.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1034149 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1034149&action=edit screenshot Description of problem: Font rendering on Fedora 21 KDE worked fine. But in Fedora 22 which uses freetype-2.5.5-1.fc22.x86_64 it is way too grainier. I use slight hint which doesn't seem to be applied at all. RPMFusion which uses F21's freetype-freeworld-2.3.11 works fine. So something must have gone wrong in the update. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aU8lA46g7B&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

[Bug 1286714] New: freetype-2.6.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286714 Bug ID: 1286714 Summary: freetype-2.6.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: freetype Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 2.6.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.6.1-1.fc24 URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/freetype/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=98VGhTqyZD&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 4

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2016