fonts-bugs November 2016

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
84 discussions

[Bug 986232] New: No figure space in liberation mono
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '16

20 Dec '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986232 Bug ID: 986232 Summary: No figure space in liberation mono Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: liberation-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: guy.guilmette+redhat(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: There is no figure space character Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.00.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Use a figure space: . Actual results: Missing character Expected results: Space equal to one character width Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qxoC1H3PJM&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Bug 798871] New: Please add Vedic Extensions to Lohit fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '16

20 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please add Vedic Extensions to Lohit fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798871 Summary: Please add Vedic Extensions to Lohit fonts Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: It is very good that Red Hat / Fedora takes steps to update Lohit fonts with latest encoded Indic characters, especially Vedic characters included in Devanagari Extended block. (See https://www.redhat.com/archives/lohit-devel-list/2012-February/msg00011.html) As a Sanskrit/Vedic scholar I very much welcome this. However, it would be even greater if the separate Vedic characters that are encoded in the Vedic Extensions block (http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1CD0.pdf) created in Unicode 5.2 along with Devanagari Extended were also supported. As Devanagari is the script mainly used for Sanskrit and especially Vedic printings nowadays, it would be best to add the characters initially to the Lohit Devanagari font so that it can combine properly with the Devanagari characters. If at all there is future demand for the glyphs to be added to the font of another script (like Telugu etc which are also often used for Vedic texts in those areas) the glyphs can easily be copied to those fonts in the future. OpenType normally cannot join base characters from one font with combining marks from a different font. So a separate Lohit Vedic font with purely Vedic characters is not possible. As the glyphs from the Vedic Extensions block have very simple shapes, it would hopefully be easy to design those glyphs and add them to the fonts. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.1 How reproducible: Install Lohit Devanagari 2.5.1 font. Actual results: The Devanagari-specific Vedic characters especially from the Devanagari Extended block are available. The generic Vedic characters from the Vedic Extensions block are not available. Expected results: It is desirable to have the generic Vedic characters from the Vedic Extensions block also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 768067] New: Lowercase U, V, W, X and Y too thin at 18px bold
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '16

20 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Lowercase U, V, W, X and Y too thin at 18px bold https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768067 Summary: Lowercase U, V, W, X and Y too thin at 18px bold Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cantabile.desu(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: The lowercase U, V, W, X and Y in liberation sans at 18px and bold are noticeably thinner than the other letters of the alphabet. It's quite distracting. There is a screenshot attached. It appears to happen only at 18px (bold). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.07.1 Additional info: I'm using arch linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 795465] New: Historical regressions (+persistent issues) found using fontlint (accompanying FontForge tool)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Historical regressions (+persistent issues) found using fontlint (accompanying FontForge tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795465 Summary: Historical regressions (+persistent issues) found using fontlint (accompanying FontForge tool) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jpokorny(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 591556] New: Font artifact with number 4
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Font artifact with number 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591556 Summary: Font artifact with number 4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: (Quoted from zayzayats(a)yandex.ru) In the Russian «б», the ascender is blurry. http://shnurapet.fedorapeople.org/rus-b.png freetype-freeworld-debuginfo-2.3.11-1.fc12.x86_64 freetype-2.3.11-3.fc12.x86_64 freetype-freeworld-2.3.11-1.fc12.x86_64 freetype-devel-2.3.11-3.fc12.x86_64 freetype-debuginfo-2.3.11-3.fc12.x86_64 $ ls /etc/yum.repos.d/ fedora-rawhide.repo rpmfusion-free.repo fedora.repo rpmfusion-free-updates.repo fedora-updates.repo rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo fedora-updates-testing.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo infinality.repo rpmfusion-nonfree.repo remi.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo $ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/infinality.repo [infinality] name=Infinality baseurl=http://www.infinality.net/fedora/linux/$releasever/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 [infinality-noarch] name=Infinality - noarch baseurl=http://www.infinality.net/fedora/linux/$releasever/noarch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 $ cat ~/.fonts.conf <?xml version='1.0'?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM 'fonts.dtd'> <fontconfig> <match target="font" > <edit mode="assign" name="rgba" > <const>rgb</const> </edit> <edit mode="assign" name="hinting" > <bool>true</bool> </edit> <edit mode="assign" name="autohint" > <bool>true</bool> </edit> <edit mode="assign" name="antialias" > <bool>true</bool> </edit> <edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle" > <const>hintfull</const> </edit> <edit name="lcdfilter" mode="assign"> <const>lcddefault</const> </edit> </match> </fontconfig> Size 8. I set 98 dpi for proper kerning. http://shnurapet.fedorapeople.org/last-line.png (It's in the center of the last line.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 29

[Bug 890993] New: xgridfit-2.3 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890993 Bug ID: 890993 Summary: xgridfit-2.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: xgridfit Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 2.3 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.2 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/xgridfit/mtime/desc/limi… Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XIoC3Ox3zs&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 11

[Bug 1398208] New: [abrt] fonttools: inspect.py:11:<module>:ImportError: No module named 'pygtk'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '16

11 Dec '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398208 Bug ID: 1398208 Summary: [abrt] fonttools: inspect.py:11:<module>:ImportError: No module named 'pygtk' Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: fonttools Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I ran `pyftinspect' with not parameters. It looks like a missing dependency declaration in the package. Version-Release number of selected component: fonttools-3.0-5.fc25 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.8.0 cmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/pyftinspect executable: /usr/bin/pyftinspect kernel: 4.8.8-300.fc25.x86_64 pkg_fingerprint: 4089 D8F2 FDB1 9C98 pkg_vendor: Fedora Project runlevel: N 5 type: Python3 uid: 5242 Truncated backtrace: #1 <module> in /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/inspect.py:11 #2 resolve in /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:2241 #3 load in /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:2235 #4 load_entry_point in /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:2575 #5 load_entry_point in /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:542 #6 <module> in /usr/bin/pyftinspect:9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1278201] New: ImportError: No module named 'pygtk'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Dec '16

11 Dec '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278201 Bug ID: 1278201 Summary: ImportError: No module named 'pygtk' Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: fonttools Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: htl10(a)users.sourceforge.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Description of problem: # pyftinspect --help Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pyftinspect", line 9, in <module> load_entry_point('fonttools==3.0', 'console_scripts', 'pyftinspect')() File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 558, in load_entry_point return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name) File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2682, in load_entry_point return ep.load() File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2355, in load return self.resolve() File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2361, in resolve module = __import__(self.module_name, fromlist=['__name__'], level=0) File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/FontTools/fontTools/inspect.py", line 11, in <module> import pygtk ImportError: No module named 'pygtk' # locate pygtk.py /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pygtk.py /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pygtk.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pygtk.pyo Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonttools-3.0-1.fc23 pygobject2-2.28.6-14.fc23.x86_64 python3-gobject-base-3.18.0-2.fc23.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. pyftinspect --help 2. 3. Actual results: as above Expected results: Anything else except the above. Additional info: It looks like fonttools-3.0-1.fc23 depends on python3 but pygobject2-2.28.6-14.fc23.x86_64 is python2, and I could not find equivalent python3 module. In any case, dependency should be automatic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fN1nhxsPlC&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 1359380] New: [Patch] Update to roman fonts 2.030 and italic fonts 1.050
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Dec '16

04 Dec '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359380 Bug ID: 1359380 Summary: [Patch] Update to roman fonts 2.030 and italic fonts 1.050 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts Assignee: mattrose(a)folkwolf.net Reporter: suraia(a)ikkoku.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jamielinux(a)fedoraproject.org, mattrose(a)folkwolf.net, me(a)ibotty.net Created attachment 1183107 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1183107&action=edit Update to roman fonts 2.030 and italic fonts 1.050 New fonts have been released. The attached patch updates the package to the newest versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1260287] New: RFE: Update to the latest upstream release
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '16

03 Dec '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260287 Bug ID: 1260287 Summary: RFE: Update to the latest upstream release Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: stix-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: fred.wang(a)free.fr QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk It seems that the latest release shipped in Fedora is 1.1.0 while the latest upstream release is 1.1.1: http://sourceforge.net/projects/stixfonts/files/Current%20Release/ Also, note that STIX 2.0.0 is in development and will probably be released soon: http://www.stixfonts.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dadGVgc9Gn&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs November 2016