https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284709
Bug ID: 1284709
Summary: fontawesome-fonts-v4.5.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: fontawesome-fonts
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, mrunge(a)redhat.com,
pvoborni(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: v4.5.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 4.4.0-2.fc24
URL: https://github.com/FortAwesome/Font-Awesome
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5UnIPwdZ19&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240265
Bug ID: 1240265
Summary: fonttools 2.5 takes too much memory
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: fonttools
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
related to Bug#1239985, after upgrading fonttools to 2.5, it doesn't work
anymore to decompile ttf to ttx.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.5-2.fc22
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.ttx -a -i -e sazanami-gothic.ttf
2.
3.
Actual results:
OOM killer kills the process
Expected results:
should works as it worked before.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Zdw8HK8hNu&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292
Summary: [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: rpm
AssignedTo: pmatilai(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pmatilai(a)redhat.com, jnovy(a)redhat.com,
ffesti(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
(this is mostly a yum-level RFE, but it would be nice if we kept the same
depsolving logic in both apps)
The problem:
Selecting a font is a multi-criterium operation. We need to match on font
family, font style, language support, unicode support, etc. At any time all of
just some of those selection criterii can be provided by the user or
applications.
To have features like font auto-installation work reliably, this matching needs
to extend to the package database
Right now rpm is only allowing to specify atomic provides, so we can have a
font package that
Provides font(dejavusans)
and
Provides
font(:lang=el)
but there is no warranty both those provides are belonging to the same font.
There is no way to distinguish between a package that includes an actual greek
dejavusans and a package that includes a dejavusans greek-less file and another
totally different greek font
To workaround this rpm limitation we've been asking packagers to put font files
belonging to different font families in different packages. However:
1. many still don't
2. it's not technically possible for all font formats, for example the ttc font
format allows mixing of fonts with different characteristics in a single file
The ideal solution:
Ability to have Provides like:
font(comma-separated font name list|comma-separated style list|comma-separated
lang list) (rough mockup that probably needs refining)
And have deps like (dejavu|*|el) work in rpm
(yes a font can declare many different names, be available in many different
styles, cover many different languages)
For ttc files we'd then generate one Provides for each font included in the ttc
bundle
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Alias: CVE-2006-3467
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070
Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow
vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Product: Security Response
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-20
06-3467
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: impact=moderate,source=rehdat,reported=20060710,public
=20060718
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: vulnerability
AssignedTo: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: vdanen(a)redhat.com
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Other
Target Release: ---
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2006-3467 to
the following vulnerability:
Name: CVE-2006-3467
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3467
Assigned: 20060710
Reference: URL:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/451426/100/200/threaded
Reference: MISC: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190593
Integer overflow in FreeType before 2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a
denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PCF
file, as demonstrated by the Red Hat
bad1.pcf test file, due to a partial fix of CVE-2006-1861.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303717
Bug ID: 1303717
Summary: [RFE] EPEL7 branch of woff
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: woff
Assignee: sshedmak(a)redhat.com
Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
sshedmak(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
It would be nice if there were an EPEL7 branch of woff
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303718
Bug ID: 1303718
Summary: [RFE] EPEL7 branch of woffTools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: woffTools
Assignee: sshedmak(a)redhat.com
Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
sshedmak(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
It would be nice if there were an EPEL7 branch of woffTools
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307238
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
gdouros-avdira-fonts-6.31-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5ab85da278
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.