June 2016 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1207607] New: Coordinate with ghostscript for upgrade to new font names

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207607 Bug ID: 1207607 Summary: Coordinate with ghostscript for upgrade to new font names Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: urw-fonts Assignee: than(a)redhat.com Reporter: twaugh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, than(a)redhat.com It looks like bug #1207577 is caused by us packaging urw-fonts separately from ghostscript. As the names of the fonts have changed, we'll need to coordinate when switching over to the new names. For the moment I'll just switch ghostscript back to using the old names. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yti4v1Y7VK&a=cc_unsubscribe

7 years, 7 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1295169] New: fontmatrix included non-free content.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295169 Bug ID: 1295169 Summary: fontmatrix included non-free content. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontmatrix Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: kame55-itasenpara123(a)y2.dion.ne.jp QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: Debian BTS 787350 Hello. fontmatrix included non-free code, Please see Debuan bug number "787350" datails. I think that this package be affected by debian bug number "787350". and, "fontmatrix-0.9.99-Source/src/icons/action-copy-char.svg" license is CC-BY-SA. I suggests that resolve license problem and add license tag. Thanks. Reference: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=787350 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MUTNxxO9Kb&a=cc_unsubscribe

7 years, 8 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 606217] New: Eccentric glyph for the lowercase Greek gamma letter (=?UTF-8?Q?=CE=B3?=)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Eccentric glyph for the lowercase Greek gamma letter (γ) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606217 Summary: Eccentric glyph for the lowercase Greek gamma letter (γ) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: discon(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The liberation fonts have a strange glyph for the lowercase Greek gamma letter whenever hinting is on. The hinting makes the glyph look similar to the 'y' letter (the bottom part tends towards left). This looks weird and is unique on this font family, AFAIK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 1228872] New: ttfcoverage from repo-font-audit crashes when checking Unicode 7.x fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228872 Bug ID: 1228872 Summary: ttfcoverage from repo-font-audit crashes when checking Unicode 7.x fonts Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: fontpackages Severity: low Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: alex.ploumistos(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tagoh(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: CPAN 85014 External Bug ID: CPAN 85014 ttfcoverage is probably not up to the Unicode 7.x specs, so when it comes across such fonts, it fails with a message like this one: Illegal division by zero at /usr/bin/ttfcoverage line 42. /usr/share/fontpackages/repo-font-audit.mk:56: recipe for target 'tmp/usr/share/fonts/gdouros-symbola/Symbola.ttf.rfo.unicover' failed make[1]: *** [tmp/usr/share/fonts/gdouros-symbola/Symbola.ttf.rfo.unicover] Error 255 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/share/fontpackages/repo-font-audit.mk:36: recipe for target 'gdouros-symbola-fonts-0_7.21-0.3.20150430.fc21.noarch/' failed make: *** [gdouros-symbola-fonts-0_7.21-0.3.20150430.fc21.noarch/] Error 2 mv: cannot move ‘./gdouros-symbola-fonts-0_7.21-0.3.20150430.fc21.noarch/tmp/usr/share/fonts/gdouros-symbola/Symbola.ttf.rfo.fontlint’ to ‘../data/gdouros-symbola-fonts-0_7.21-0.3.20150430.fc21.noarch/usr_share_fonts_gdouros-symbola_Symbola.ttf.fontlint.txt’: No such file or directory Nothing is logged anywhere when this occurs. The only other reference to this I could find was on CPAN's bugtracker, but it's not that useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H8Gnge9tF1&a=cc_unsubscribe

7 years, 9 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1228870] New: repo-font-audit doesn't know about xml metadata files

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228870 Bug ID: 1228870 Summary: repo-font-audit doesn't know about xml metadata files Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: fontpackages Severity: low Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: alex.ploumistos(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tagoh(a)redhat.com When font packages that contain xml metadata files are checked with repo-font-audit, it throws the following error: fonts in packages that contain non-font data Since xml metadata files are now required for font packages, the script should be updated to recognize them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=84GPn6G62c&a=cc_unsubscribe

7 years, 9 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1179691] New: Bold lower-case letter "s" looks in some cases too thin with Medium+ hinting

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179691 Bug ID: 1179691 Summary: Bold lower-case letter "s" looks in some cases too thin with Medium+ hinting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: liberation-fonts Severity: low Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: michal.nowak(a)resist.ca QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 977206 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=977206&action=edit Lower-case "s" too thin on Full hinting Description of problem: Bold lower-case letter "s" in serif looks in some cases too thin with Medium and Full hinting, but look OK with hinting set to Slight or None. See attached screenshots from LO Writer from F21. See the "s" in a word "Midas" and "asked". It's 12 pt Liberation Serif, bold, paper is enlarged to 157 % of width of A4 paper. When the zoom ratio gets higher, the problem disappears, when zoomed out it's worse (but less visible). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-serif-fonts-1.07.4-4.fc21.noarch freetype-2.5.3-13.fc21.x86_64 libreoffice-core-4.3.5.2-4.fc21.x86_64 How reproducible: Always. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IG83soyygr&a=cc_unsubscribe

7 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1187678] New: RFC: Please give feedback about a compat stix-fonts 1.0.0

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187678 Bug ID: 1187678 Summary: RFC: Please give feedback about a compat stix-fonts 1.0.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: stix-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk I understand that to certain extent, this is kind of a revive of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885307 I made a tentative alternative, to handle https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/381 But the above is already quite old, but latest matplotlib still relies on its bundled stix-fonts-1.0.0 Instead of compat-stix-fonts it could be named something else including 1-0 or 1_0 in the name, in case stix-fonts is updated to the now available 2.0 version. This package at first would be used only by python-matplotlib and would remove the need of bundling the stix 1.0 fonts. Spec URL: https://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/compat-stix-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/compat-stix-fonts-1.0.0-1.el7.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PhtXAJgbtB&a=cc_unsubscribe

7 years, 9 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1084228] New: Hinting for Liberation Sans inferior at small font size

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084228 Bug ID: 1084228 Summary: Hinting for Liberation Sans inferior at small font size Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: Eduard.Braun2(a)gmx.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 882473 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=882473&action=edit testcase with the problematic font charakteristics Wikipedia recently switched to a predefined CSS font stack for body font so even Windows users will be served with Liberation Sans if installed (e.g. because it is distributed with Libre Office). This made apparent inferior hinting of Liberation Sans with bold weight when rendered at the specific size of 0.875em (the font size used in MediaWiki's vector skin). Most notable "e"s have a very thick lower curve while the upper curve is much too thin. This also applies for variants like "è é ê ë". Funnily not for "œ æ" though which is rendered differently. Also notable is e.g. "s" which has thick upper/lower curves but is thin in the middle. A testcase with the described font characteristics set is attached. The screenshot shows the rendering in Firefox. The screenshot was created with Firefox 28.0 on Windows 7. The installed version of the Liberation fonts is 2.00.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=te4zKki7hK&a=cc_unsubscribe

7 years, 9 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 1068918] New: Google Droid Sans font is displayed as [unknown] and [monotype], it breaks GTK+ apps view in KDE

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068918 Bug ID: 1068918 Summary: Google Droid Sans font is displayed as [unknown] and [monotype], it breaks GTK+ apps view in KDE Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: google-droid-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: carasin.berlogue(a)mail.ru QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hobbes1069(a)gmail.com, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 963502 Description of problem: > [google-droid-sans-fonts] package is broken since F18. I want to select 'Droid Sans' font for KDE UI, but this font is displayed twice at [systemsettings]: with [unknown] and [monotype] suffixes. If I apply anyone of them, only KDE/Qt apps use 'Droid Sans' font, but GTK2/GTK3 apps use the defaul font (DejaVu Sans). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-6.fc20.noarch How reproducible: > Always. Steps to Reproduce: > 1. [yum install google-droid-sans-fonts]; 2. start KDE session; 3. launch <select UI fonts> dialog at [systemsettings]; 4. 'Droid Sans' font is displayed twice: with [unknown] and [monotype] suffixes; 5. select and apply anyone — 'Droid Sans [unknown]' or 'Droid Sans [monotype]'; 6. KDE/Qt apps use the Droid Sans font, but GTK2/GTK3 apps use the defaul font (DejaVu Sans). Actual results: > 'Droid Sans' font is not applied for GTK2/GTK3 apps. This font is displayed twice at [systemsettings]: with [unknown] and [monotype] suffixes. Expected results: > 'Droid Sans' font is applied for all the apps. This font is displayed once at [systemsettings] — without any suffix. Additional info: > This bug is several years old. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963502#c1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EIzrPE5DPR&a=cc_unsubscribe

7 years, 9 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1319189] New: incorrect use of Requires(pre)?

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319189 Bug ID: 1319189 Summary: incorrect use of Requires(pre)? Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: urw-fonts Assignee: than(a)redhat.com Reporter: jsilhan(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, than(a)redhat.com We've identified your package for having `Requires(pre)` RPM flag without `Requires` [1]. `Requires(pre)` rpm tag could be interpreted wrongly, so to prevent any harm to Fedora users I am notifying you about this fact. Any package that is specified in `Requires(pre)` could be freely removed. Citing from RPM pages: ``` If there are no other dependencies on the package providing /usr/sbin/useradd, that package is permitted to be removed from the system after installation(!) ``` [2] If you really rely on dependency just during the installation process and your package don't necessary require the dependency for the proper run of your application then ignore this bug report and close it as NOTABUG. Otherwise add to your spec file additional `Requires` for the dependency, please. [1] paste.fedoraproject.org/341611/82208431 [2] http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/MoreOnDependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs June 2016