January 2017 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1417415] New: fonttools-3.6.1 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417415 Bug ID: 1417415 Summary: fonttools-3.6.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 3.6.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.6.0-1.fc26 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

2
9
0 / 0

[Bug 1405665] New: google-roboto-fonts-2.136 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405665 Bug ID: 1405665 Summary: google-roboto-fonts-2.136 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: google-roboto-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: dtardon(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dtardon(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 2.136 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.135-1.fc26 URL: https://github.com/google/roboto Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/12041/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1397775] Review Request: fontsquirrel-crete-round-fonts - General purpose warm slab serif font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397775 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/fontsquirrel-crete-rou... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1416999] New: fonttools-3.6.0 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416999 Bug ID: 1416999 Summary: fonttools-3.6.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 3.6.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.5.0-1.fc26 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 1409247] dnf autoremove can not remove some packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409247 --- Comment #7 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #6) > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5) > > (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #4) > > > fontconfig just requires one English font (at least, and no deps to the > > > specific fonts) to make it working. it was added to address it by the > > > request. I'm not sure if the langpacks sasisfies that though, if you have > > > any idea, please let me know. > > Imagine, you install fontconfig which pulls font X. Then you install fluxbox > > which pulls font Y. Both of them have Provides: font(:lang=en). When you > > remove fluxbox (and all unneeded packages) solver doesn't know which font is > > better to remove, X or Y. So it keeps both. > > I could imagine why this happened. but there are no reaons to depend on the > specific fonts in fontconfig, then I said I'm not sure if or how the > langpacks sasisfies the fontconfig's requirements. > > > Backto original bug: how come that it requires one English font? Is there > > some bug behind it or ...? > > that's easy to imagine too... when no fonts installed on the system, > fontconfig will returns no fonts against the request from the applications. > then applications won't work as expected due to that. I would recommend starting discussion on devel(a)lists.fp.o and get some feedback there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1413423] New: fonttools-3.5.0 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413423 Bug ID: 1413423 Summary: fonttools-3.5.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 3.5.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.4.0-1.fc26 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477445, which changed state. Bug 477445 Summary: [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed|2010-06-28 07:00:10 |2017-01-13 12:32:10 --- Comment #20 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> --- Closing based on comments #c16 and #c17. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1409247] dnf autoremove can not remove some packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409247 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5) > (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #4) > > fontconfig just requires one English font (at least, and no deps to the > > specific fonts) to make it working. it was added to address it by the > > request. I'm not sure if the langpacks sasisfies that though, if you have > > any idea, please let me know. > Imagine, you install fontconfig which pulls font X. Then you install fluxbox > which pulls font Y. Both of them have Provides: font(:lang=en). When you > remove fluxbox (and all unneeded packages) solver doesn't know which font is > better to remove, X or Y. So it keeps both. I could imagine why this happened. but there are no reaons to depend on the specific fonts in fontconfig, then I said I'm not sure if or how the langpacks sasisfies the fontconfig's requirements. > Backto original bug: how come that it requires one English font? Is there > some bug behind it or ...? that's easy to imagine too... when no fonts installed on the system, fontconfig will returns no fonts against the request from the applications. then applications won't work as expected due to that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1409247] dnf autoremove can not remove some packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409247 --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #4) > fontconfig just requires one English font (at least, and no deps to the > specific fonts) to make it working. it was added to address it by the > request. I'm not sure if the langpacks sasisfies that though, if you have > any idea, please let me know. Imagine, you install fontconfig which pulls font X. Then you install fluxbox which pulls font Y. Both of them have Provides: font(:lang=en). When you remove fluxbox (and all unneeded packages) solver doesn't know which font is better to remove, X or Y. So it keeps both. Langpack system works with weak (and IIRC rich dependencies). You can check implementation: * https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/langpacks.git/tree/langpacks.spec * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Langpacks Making something similar could take a bit of time, but it will be definitely better. Backto original bug: how come that it requires one English font? Is there some bug behind it or ...? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2017