https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506925
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506918
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506916
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496466
--- Comment #18 from Federico Bruni <fede(a)inventati.org> ---
David, OTF files would be useful also to be able to compile LilyPond (a music
typesetting program, packaged in Fedora) without a warning:
WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs or files: URW++ OTF
fonts
These files are optional but it would be nice to have them.
Recent discussion on the subject is here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-10/msg00141.html
Thanks for your efforts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500695
Bug ID: 1500695
Summary: CVE-2017-13720 CVE-2017-13722 libXfont: various flaws
[fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 26
Component: libXfont
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: low
Priority: low
Assignee: btissoir(a)redhat.com
Reporter: anemec(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
btissoir(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
caolanm(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jglisse(a)redhat.com, john.j5live(a)gmail.com,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only
one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at
the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other,
you may clone this bug as appropriate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497579
Bug ID: 1497579
Summary: python-fontMath-0.4.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: python-fontMath
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 0.4.4
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.4.3-3.fc27
URL: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/fontMath
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/13898/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Shawn Starr <shawn.starr(a)rogers.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends On| |1440971
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971
[Bug 1440971] Review Request: python-pyclipper - Cython wrapper for the
C++ translation of the Angus Johnson's Clipper library
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498747
Bug ID: 1498747
Summary: gv is not finding standard postscript fonts like
Times-Roman
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: urw-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: dkaspar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: nvwarr(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dkaspar(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, than(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1334637
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1334637&action=edit
Simple eps file to illustrate the problem
Description of problem:
gv is not finding the standard postscript fonts like Times-Roman. The same is
true of epstopdf (from texlive-epstopdf-bin) and gs.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gv-3.7.4-14.fc27.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. gv circle.eps (with the attached eps file)
Actual results:
shows the circle and gives an invalid font error message and does not show the
text "circle" which should be in the middle of the circle.
Expected results:
should show the circle with the text in the middle without an error message.
Additional info:
It works fine on Fedora 26 with:
gv-3.7.4-12.fc26.x86_64
On Fedora 26, these fonts belong to urw-fonts. According to
dnf whatprovides /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1
the package urw-fonts still exists and still provides the directory where the
fonts should be, but it can't be installed because of a conflict:
dnf install urw-fonts
gives:
Package urw-base35-fonts-20170801-2.fc27.noarch is already installed, skipping.
Manually copying the fonts from the Fedora 26 to the Fedora 27 system fixes the
problem.
So it seems to be a packaging issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376476
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] <dkaspar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |urw-base35-fonts-20170801-2
| |.fc28,
| |urw-base35-fonts-20170801-2
| |.fc27
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2017-05-13 21:35:43 |2017-10-04 11:31:19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.