November 2017 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1496761] "Noto Color Emoji" would be a better default emoji font than "Emoji One"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496761 Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, | |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, | |pnemade(a)redhat.com Component|gnome-themes-standard |fontconfig Fixed In Version| |fontconfig-2.12.6-3.fc27 | |fontconfig-2.12.6-3.fc26 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Assignee|ignatenko(a)redhat.com |tagoh(a)redhat.com Last Closed|2017-10-09 16:00:01 |2017-11-06 10:56:55 --- Comment #15 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jeremy Bicha from comment #9) > (In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #2) > > I sent an upstream patch to the list about this: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2017-October/thread.html > > Really? Where? https://cgit.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/commit/?id=c41c9220181b203d1cf1f6... > I hope you don't mind me reopening this for discussion for Fedora 28, > especially since as far as I can tell Fedora 27 doesn't include a color > emoji font by default. That's a bug in gnome-themes-standard, not the bug we're discussing here about fontconfig. > As I'm sure you're aware, newer version of the emojione font are not > redistributable. We already know, it's written as such in the package spec file: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/eosrei-emojione-fonts.git/tree/eo... > I looked at emojitwo today and it looks like it requires > several grunt/node packages in order to build from source, but the emojitwo > build documentation is non-existent so I may be wrong. > > So it's awkward for distros to package a dead font (emojione) and it's > difficult for them to package emojitwo. We know all this, but decided that it was the best solution for this purpose already. There should be discussions about this on the Fedora Workstation list, as well as in the GNOME bugzilla and/or wiki. If in doubt about any of those, I'd be happy repeating those arguments on the fontconfig list, if you send an email there and CC: me. Resetting the status of the bug, as the problem in question was already fixed in an errata. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696 Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |puiterwijk(a)redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> --- (In reply to Peng Wu from comment #2) > > Maybe it is okay to keep it in Fedora, and not install by default. Agreed, I don't think Android Emoji is the best choice to be included by default. Patrick Uiterwijk: do you remember the motivation behind commit https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/c/72d02210013696513644d5671d6ba453cd513921... ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696 --- Comment #2 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> --- But some X11 apps can't support color emoji font, we need to provide some black and white fonts for some X11 apps. Maybe it is okay to keep it in Fedora, and not install by default. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696 --- Comment #1 from Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> --- This pull request removes it from the default install https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/180#request_diff I think that is good enough, there is no need to drop the package. By the way, not all color emoji fonts are really up-to-date, currently only "Noto Color Emoji" seems to have all the Unicode 10.0.0 emoji and render all the sequences from http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/5.0/ correctly. "Emoji One" lacks all the emoji added in Unicode 10.0.0 and renders many sequences incorrectly which were already defined in http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/4.0/ (released when Unicode 9.0.0 was released). The best black and white Emoji font currently is Symbola, it has all the Emoji added in Uniocde 10.0.0 (and very nicely drawn in my opinion). But it renders *all* Emoji sequences incorrectly. *And* with the latest fontconfig update, colour emoji fonts are used by default as long as any of the known colour emoji fonts is installed, so Symbola would be used only as a fallback when no colour emoji font is installed or the colour emoji font which is installed lacks some newer emoji. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696 Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, mavit(a)mavit.org.uk Component|google-noto-emoji-fonts |google-android-emoji-fonts Assignee|pwu(a)redhat.com |mavit(a)mavit.org.uk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1509487] New: Upstream has gone away for fontpackages

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509487 Bug ID: 1509487 Summary: Upstream has gone away for fontpackages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontpackages Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: mavit(a)mavit.org.uk QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, tagoh(a)redhat.com Source0 and wiki page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages direct you to http://fedorahosted.org/ for the fontpackages source code, but that site’s no-longer with us. Should a new repository be set up at, say, https://pagure.io/? I see that there’s a repository at https://github.com/pnemade/fontpackages that could be cloned from. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1509386] Review Request: polarsys-b612-fonts - A typeface designed for reading comfort and safety in aeroplane cockpits

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509386 --- Comment #2 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> --- (In reply to Iwicki Artur from comment #1) > The "Group:" tag and "%clean" section should not be used. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections Thanks. I have updated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts to reflect this, and notice that bug #1271620 is already open against /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec. > Please check if the following will work for Source0: > http://git.polarsys.org/c/b612/b612.git/snapshot/b612-%{gitcommit}.tar.gz Indeed it does. Splendid! SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mavit/polarsys-b612-fonts... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1509386] Review Request: polarsys-b612-fonts - A typeface designed for reading comfort and safety in aeroplane cockpits

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509386 Iwicki Artur <fedora(a)svgames.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora(a)svgames.pl --- Comment #1 from Iwicki Artur <fedora(a)svgames.pl> --- >Group: User Interface/X > [...] >%clean The "Group:" tag and "%clean" section should not be used. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections >Source0: %{name}-%{version}-%{gitcommit}.tar.xz It's preferred for this to be a downloadable URL. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL Please check if the following will work for Source0: http://git.polarsys.org/c/b612/b612.git/snapshot/b612-%{gitcommit}.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1509386] Review Request: polarsys-b612-fonts - A typeface designed for reading comfort and safety in aeroplane cockpits

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509386 Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1506961] Review Request: adobe-source-han-code-jp-fonts - Adobe OpenType UI font for mixed Latin and Japanese text

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506961 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2017-11-03 03:47:18 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- built on rawhide https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=25525 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs November 2017