November 2017 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1517565] New: lato Webfonts are not included

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517565 Bug ID: 1517565 Summary: lato Webfonts are not included Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lato-fonts Assignee: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com, piotr1212(a)gmail.com Description of problem: lato-fonts package doesn't contain the Webfonts, which are available as a separate download from http://www.latofonts.com/ . Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.015-4.fc27 Additional information: Please see fontawesome-fonts package for an example of how to do it. fontawesome-fonts-web contains the webfonts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1517637] improper properties wrapping for long name files

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517637 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxg(a)live.com Flags| |needinfo?(lxg(a)live.com) --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- what's the version of pango do you have? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1517637] improper properties wrapping for long name files

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517637 --- Comment #2 from lxg <lxg(a)live.com> --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #1) > You linked an upstream pango bug, so pango is probably a better place to > land this (though arguably,if it's already acknowledged usptream, there's > less need for us to track it here, imo). Dear Dieter, I am sorry that I not familiar with related systems, and please forward this to the proper place. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1519082] CVE-2017-16611 libXfont: User can trigger arbitrary file read by X server causing a DoS

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519082 Tomas Hoger <thoger(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|libXfont-1.5.4, |libXfont 1.5.4, libXfont2 |libXfont2-2.0.3 |2.0.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1519082] CVE-2017-16611 libXfont: User can trigger arbitrary file read by X server causing a DoS

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519082 Sam Fowler <sfowler(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1519085 Fixed In Version|libXfont-1.5.4 |libXfont-1.5.4, |libXfont2-2.0.3 |libXfont2-2.0.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1519082] CVE-2017-16611 libXfont: User can trigger arbitrary file read by X server causing a DoS

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519082 Sam Fowler <sfowler(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1519083, 1519084 --- Comment #1 from Sam Fowler <sfowler(a)redhat.com> --- Created libXfont tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1519084] Created libXfont2 tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 1519083] Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519083 [Bug 1519083] CVE-2017-16611 libXfont2: libXfont: User can trigger arbitrary file read by X server causing a DoS [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519084 [Bug 1519084] CVE-2017-16611 libXfont: User can trigger arbitrary file read by X server causing a DoS [fedora-all] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1508682] New: julietaula-montserrat-fonts-v7.200 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508682 Bug ID: 1508682 Summary: julietaula-montserrat-fonts-v7.200 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: julietaula-montserrat-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Latest upstream release: v7.200 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.002-3.fc27 URL: https://github.com/JulietaUla/Montserrat/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/10157/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 1517637] improper properties wrapping for long name files

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

6 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1319249] New: incorrect use of Requires(pre)?

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319249 Bug ID: 1319249 Summary: incorrect use of Requires(pre)? Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghostscript-fonts Assignee: twaugh(a)redhat.com Reporter: jsilhan(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, twaugh(a)redhat.com We've identified your package for having `Requires(pre)` RPM flag without `Requires` [1]. `Requires(pre)` rpm tag could be interpreted wrongly, so to prevent any harm to Fedora users I am notifying you about this fact. Any package that is specified in `Requires(pre)` could be freely removed. Citing from RPM pages: ``` If there are no other dependencies on the package providing /usr/sbin/useradd, that package is permitted to be removed from the system after installation(!) ``` [2] If you really rely on dependency just during the installation process and your package don't necessary require the dependency for the proper run of your application then ignore this bug report and close it as NOTABUG. Otherwise add to your spec file additional `Requires` for the dependency, please. [1] paste.fedoraproject.org/341611/82208431 [2] http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/MoreOnDependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477389, which changed state. Bug 477389 Summary: [ghostscript-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs November 2017