December 2017 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Peng Wu from comment #8) > (In reply to Jeremy Bicha from comment #7) > > Why don't you package nototools separately? You are using an embedded copy > > of nototools to build google-noto-emoji-fonts and emojitwo-fonts (in COPR, > > not yet in Fedora). > > > The problem is that nototools can't by installed when we package, > the upstream didn't tell when the tools can be installed. > > If we package nototools separately, it will only install > some symbolic links of the scripts and can't run when we package it. That sounds like the upstream build system is broken. If this is the case, we should fix it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1513999] terminal - mono fonts have gone haywire?

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513999 --- Comment #3 from lejeczek <peljasz(a)yahoo.co.uk> --- All I'm saying is - eg. Nimbus mono font, renders quite differently on f27, see f26 and compare. Sure, it's subjective and you know... I think I've gotten used to new f27, maybe it's not so bad after all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #11 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> --- Thanks. I've updated the spec to use C.UTF-8, too. SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mavit/twitter-twemoji-fon... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #10 from Jeremy Bicha <jbicha(a)ubuntu.com> --- (In reply to Peng Wu from comment #8) > The problem is that nototools can't by installed when we package, > the upstream didn't tell when the tools can be installed. I don't think that's true. It works fine in Debian (but Debian has a lot of tools to automatically do the right thing for Python packages). In Debian, nototools ships all the stuff from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nototools/ but for /usr/bin, only add_vs_cmap is installed (with the .py suffix dropped. If you do that, you'll need to patch the Noto Color Emoji build script to look for add_vs_cmap without the .py suffix too) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #9 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #6) > Peng Wu: Do you please happen to remember why the spec file for > google-noto-emoji-fonts includes the following lines? > > > # Work around UTF-8 > > export LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 Because the python script of build process will print Unicode character, by default python 2 will crash with Unicode character in koji. By setting non-English locale will work around the crash. Thanks for the comments, I changed it to "C.UTF-8" now. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 --- Comment #8 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jeremy Bicha from comment #7) > Why don't you package nototools separately? You are using an embedded copy > of nototools to build google-noto-emoji-fonts and emojitwo-fonts (in COPR, > not yet in Fedora). The problem is that nototools can't by installed when we package, the upstream didn't tell when the tools can be installed. If we package nototools separately, it will only install some symbolic links of the scripts and can't run when we package it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1514274] Review Request: twitter-twemoji-fonts - Twitter Emoji for everyone

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274 Jeremy Bicha <jbicha(a)ubuntu.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbicha(a)ubuntu.com --- Comment #7 from Jeremy Bicha <jbicha(a)ubuntu.com> --- Why don't you package nototools separately? You are using an embedded copy of nototools to build google-noto-emoji-fonts and emojitwo-fonts (in COPR, not yet in Fedora). See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries (I'm not a Fedora uploader or reviewer.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1513579] New: Fonts inside Console Applications look much smaller and worse compared to F26

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513579 Bug ID: 1513579 Summary: Fonts inside Console Applications look much smaller and worse compared to F26 Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: freetype Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: mwoodson(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I know that this is a subjective bug. But I want to bring it up nonetheless. In Fedora 26 I spent a lot of time adjusting my fonts. I ended up with, what I thought, very nice looking fonts in my GUI console apps (Terminator is my choice, but I could do it in gnome-terminal, konsole, etc...) I spend about 80% of my day inside of these apps, so this is kinda important to me. I have applied the hinting as suggested all over. I was really happy. I am using freetype-freeworld, and I am using these settings: ======================================= $ xrdb -query | grep Xft Xft.antialias: 1 Xft.dpi: 96 Xft.hinting: 1 Xft.hintstyle: hintslight Xft.lcdfilter: lcddefault Xft.rgba: rgb ======================================= I did the system upgrade from F26 -> F27. The fonts inside of my console apps are now uglier. They feel smaller, and more squished together, blockier. I have read a lot, and apparently freetype has changed the default renderer in 2.7. It also seems a new default is coming in 2.8.1, but that doesn't seem to have landed in Fedora yet. It's now using a v40 as opposed to v35. This changed seemed to happen last year, so I'm not sure if F26 had v35 or v40. This is talked about here. https://www.freetype.org/freetype2/docs/subpixel-hinting.html It also has a suggestion of reverting to the "old" style of 35, by adding this to your profile: "FREETYPE_PROPERTIES=truetype:interpreter-version=35" I have tried this, but it didn't seem to do anything different. I am looking for suggestions on how to make this look better. I feel the fonts regressed. Again, I understand this is subjective, and maybe after a few weeks I will just get used to it, but I wanted to bring it up. In IRC they suggested I file a bug, so here it is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1513999] terminal - mono fonts have gone haywire?

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513999 Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed| |2017-12-13 13:29:06 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1513579 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1513999] terminal - mono fonts have gone haywire?

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513999 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax(a)redhat.com, | |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, | |kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, | |mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, | |mkasik(a)redhat.com Component|gnome-terminal |freetype Assignee|mclasen(a)redhat.com |mkasik(a)redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> --- This is highly subjective, of course. In any case, font rendering is largely determined by freetype. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs December 2017