https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org,
| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org, panemade(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
1) I am not sure if something is wrong on my f27 system but following does not
give any output to me whereas all other fonts are giving some output.
sudo dnf repoquery --provides eosrei-emojione-fonts
sudo dnf repoquery --requires eosrei-emojione-fonts
2) Good to add appstream metainfo file for this font like we have this
/usr/share/appdata/abattis-cantarell.metainfo.xml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485076
Bug ID: 1485076
Summary: ile /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pango-enum-types.h
conflicts between attempted installs of
pango-devel-1.40.11-1.fc26.i686 and pang
o-devel-1.40.11-1.fc26.x86_64
Product: Fedora
Version: 26
Component: pango
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: htl10(a)users.sourceforge.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
# rpm -q pango-devel
pango-devel-1.40.9-1.fc26.i686
pango-devel-1.40.9-1.fc26.x86_64
# dnf upgrade --refresh
...
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pango-enum-types.h conflicts between
attempted installs of pango-devel-1.40.11-1.fc26.i686 and pang
o-devel-1.40.11-1.fc26.x86_64
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-devel-1.40.9-1.fc26.i686
pango-devel-1.40.9-1.fc26.x86_64
upgrading to
pango-devel-1.40.11-1.fc26.i686
pango-devel-1.40.11-1.fc26.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. as above
2.
3.
Actual results:
conflict
Expected results:
upgrade successful.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260061
Bug ID: 1260061
Summary: fallbacks for TmsRmn and Helv
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: caolanm(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
External Bug ID: Document Foundation 91004
External Bug ID: Document Foundation 91004
There are MSOffice documents that refer to "TmsRmn" and "Helv" fonts, and
fontconfig doesn't suggest suitable replacements.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/82860
"TmsRmn and Helv ... We still have the exact same fonts, but now under the
names MS Sans Serif and MS Serif"
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/68536
"Font Family Bitstream Canon Adobe HP
----------- --------- ----- ----- --
Swiss (Helv) Swiss Swiss Helvetica Universe
Roman (Tms Rmn) Dutch Dutch Times Roman CG Times"
So "Helv" == "MS Serif" and both could be added as part of the Helvetica group
of mappings I guess and "Tms Rmn" == "MS Sans Serif" and both are presumably
then suitable for mapping to the "Nimbus Roman No9 L"/"Times New Roman" targets
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XYv5MApiTj&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
fonts-bugs mailing list
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org