https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496466
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> ---
libreoffice probably just started to filter fonts in obsolete formats such as
Postscript. Pre-opentype formats are really limitating for applications that do
non-trivial text processing, and libreoffice folks did a huge amount of work
lately to fix their text rendering stack.
Someone should really package tex gyre in Fedora, now that the legal issues
have been solved (IIRC). That's basically the same fonts in an opentype
container.
http://www.gust.org.pl/projects/e-foundry/tex-gyre
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496466
Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org,
| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje
| |ct.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407605
Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #41 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> ---
We show more information now. Please reopen if you miss anything in particular.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
eosrei-emojione-fonts-1.0-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-25da69a47f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #8)
> (In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
> > > 2) Good to add appstream metainfo file for this font like we have this
> > > /usr/share/appdata/abattis-cantarell.metainfo.xml
> >
> > Can you please file a separate bug about this?
>
> FWIW, I'm not really sure of why we'd need that when both cantarell and
> emojione are pulled in by portion of our default desktop.
Hm, You are right. I am not sure if this can be a new topic of discussion. We
have almost all fonts providing metainfo files and then some fonts are already
present in default desktop installation. Not sure if we want to remove metainfo
files from them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
--- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #7)
> (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
> > 2) Good to add appstream metainfo file for this font like we have this
> > /usr/share/appdata/abattis-cantarell.metainfo.xml
>
> Can you please file a separate bug about this?
FWIW, I'm not really sure of why we'd need that when both cantarell and
emojione are pulled in by portion of our default desktop.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487123
--- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #6)
> 1) I am not sure if something is wrong on my f27 system but following does
> not give any output to me whereas all other fonts are giving some output.
>
> sudo dnf repoquery --provides eosrei-emojione-fonts
> sudo dnf repoquery --requires eosrei-emojione-fonts
$ rpm -q --provides eosrei-emojione-fonts
eosrei-emojione-fonts = 1.0-4.fc27
font(emojione)
As expected.
> 2) Good to add appstream metainfo file for this font like we have this
> /usr/share/appdata/abattis-cantarell.metainfo.xml
Can you please file a separate bug about this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.