October 2018 - fonts-bugs - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 1628812] New: typo in 66-google-noto-mono.conf
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Dec '18

07 Dec '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628812 Bug ID: 1628812 Summary: typo in 66-google-noto-mono.conf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: google-noto-fonts Keywords: EasyFix, i18n Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Noto Mono should be monospaced font though, 66-google-noto-mono.conf made an alias for sans-serif. that should be monospace. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 20161022-8.fc29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1636511] New: update to 2017-09-19 release
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Dec '18

07 Dec '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636511 Bug ID: 1636511 Summary: update to 2017-09-19 release Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: google-noto-fonts Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I think we should update F28-F29 from the current 20161022 snapshot to the latest stable 2017-09-19 release. https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts/releases/tag/v2017-09-19-phase3-se… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1449166] New: Shape for Serbian Cyrillic BE Wrong
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449166 Bug ID: 1449166 Summary: Shape for Serbian Cyrillic BE Wrong Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: rosella.capriotti(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1277346 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1277346&action=edit DELTA and Serbian BE in Liberation 2 Description of problem: On Lubuntu 17.04 & Libreoffice 5.3.1.2, the shape of Serbian Cyrillic BE in Liberation Serif v.2 looks uncannily like Greek DELTA. The shape in version 1 seems to me more appropriate. I added two attachments for the two versions of Liberation Serif: on both Greek DELTA is on the right for the sake of comparison. Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1530061] New: Add support for ligatures for liberation-serif font
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530061 Bug ID: 1530061 Summary: Add support for ligatures for liberation-serif font Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: jakob.jakobson13(a)posteo.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Dear developers, it would be nice if the liberation-serif font would support ligatures as this looks nicer in longer texts. Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1564762] New: texlive-sourcecodepro also has the same fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564762 Bug ID: 1564762 Summary: texlive-sourcecodepro also has the same fonts Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts Assignee: mattrose(a)folkwolf.net Reporter: hvtaifwkbgefbaei(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jamielinux(a)fedoraproject.org, mattrose(a)folkwolf.net Description of problem: texlive-sourcecodepro also has the same fonts. Having these fonts in one package is enough. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): adobe-source-code-pro-fonts-2.030.1.050-3.fc27.noarch texlive-sourcecodepro-svn40597-37.fc27.5.noarch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1564719] New: hinting of "ti" ligature does not match other letters, x-height is slightly too low
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564719 Bug ID: 1564719 Summary: hinting of "ti" ligature does not match other letters, x-height is slightly too low Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: lato-fonts Assignee: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com Reporter: dcallagh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com, piotr1212(a)gmail.com Created attachment 1418442 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1418442&action=edit screenshot I noticed this after upgrading Fedora 26->27, specifically from: freetype-2.7.1-10.fc26.x86_64 lato-fonts-2.015-3.fc26.noarch to: freetype-2.8-8.fc27.x86_64 lato-fonts-2.015-4.fc27.noarch Not sure if the problem is in Freetype or the Lato font. Rendering of all fonts on my system changed visibly after upgrading, but Lato in particular changed quite noticeably. However the only problem seems to be with the "ti" ligature in Lato, so I assume it is some wrong/missing hinting data on that ligature. I don't see any problem with other ligatures like "fi". Screenshot showing the problem is attached. This is using Lato, size 12, as my GTK UI font in Xorg: $ xrdb -q | grep Xft Xft.antialias: 1 Xft.hinting: 1 Xft.hintstyle: hintslight Xft.rgba: rgb Xft.dpi: 110 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1516939] New: firefox from fedora and latest nightly misrenders the square brackets in the math display
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1516939 Bug ID: 1516939 Summary: firefox from fedora and latest nightly misrenders the square brackets in the math display Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: freetype Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: shlomif(a)shlomifish.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Description of problem: firefox from fedora and latest nightly (59.0a1) misrenders the square brackets in the math display here: http://www.shlomifish.org/MathVentures/dodeca.html . Tested both in a new firefox profile - it happens there too. It doesn't happen on my mageia 7 x86-64 system. I am using Xfce here. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 27 x86-64. How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to the URL. 2. Scroll down to the formulae with the square brackets. 3. Actual results: The square brackets are not high enough. Expected results: They should be the right height. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1526143] New: CVE-2017-17521 fontforge: Command injetion in help function uiutil.c [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526143 Bug ID: 1526143 Summary: CVE-2017-17521 fontforge: Command injetion in help function uiutil.c [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: fontforge Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of fedora-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1532027] New: ecolier-court-fonts subpackages are swapped
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532027 Bug ID: 1532027 Summary: ecolier-court-fonts subpackages are swapped Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: ecolier-court-fonts Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk Description of problem: ecolier-court-fonts actually contains Écolier lignes court. ecolier-court-lignes-fonts actually contains Écolier court. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-23.fc27.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install ecolier-court-fonts. Actual results: You get the lignes variant. Expected results: You get the variant without the lines. Additional info: And vice-versa, if you actually want the lines variant, e.g., to teach or learn French handwriting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1498269] New: Noto Color Emoji and Noto Emoji fixed fonts cause a X error in a tcl/ tk script
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498269 Bug ID: 1498269 Summary: Noto Color Emoji and Noto Emoji fixed fonts cause a X error in a tcl/tk script Product: Fedora Version: 26 Component: google-noto-fonts Severity: high Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: jlc(a)cfl.rr.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1333924 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1333924&action=edit test script do demonistrate emoji fix font causing an X error Description of problem: The NCID (Network Caller ID) client is written in tcl/tk. When the google-noto-emoji-fonts became part of the standard install for Fedora, the ncid client would cause an X error and crash every time it scanned for fixed fonts. The attached script was written to determine and verify the problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): google-noto-emoji-fonts-20170827-1.fc26.noarch How reproducible: Reproducible every time test script run on Fedora 26 and also Fedora 25. Steps to Reproduce: 1. run attached test script 2. 3. Actual results: X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length error) Major opcode of failed request: 138 (RENDER) Minor opcode of failed request: 20 (RenderAddGlyphs) Serial number of failed request: 476 Current serial number in output stream: 539 Expected results: Expected script not to cause an X error and crash. Additional info: Uncomment the two Noto Emoji font lines in testfonts.tk to not get the X error. The bug is also reported at https://core.tcl.tk/tk/tktview/3767882e066523dc9ae4 but it is considered a font problem not a tk problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 1545149] New: OTF/CFF conts no longer hinted horizontally
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545149 Bug ID: 1545149 Summary: OTF/CFF conts no longer hinted horizontally Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: freetype Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: ossman(a)cendio.se QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com I upgraded from Fedora 26 to Fedora 27 and all of a sudden OTF/CFF fonts such as Cantarell are no longer hinted horizontally, making them appear blurry and out of focus. A similar change was done for TTF fonts previously, but that could be reverted by setting "FREETYPE_PROPERTIES=truetype:interpreter-version=35". Is there a similar setting hidden for this latest change? The normal font hinting settings have no effect on this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1427550] New: Adding additional Glyphs in Tamil
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427550 Bug ID: 1427550 Summary: Adding additional Glyphs in Tamil Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lohit-tamil-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: nsesha92(a)yahoo.co.in QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1258398 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1258398&action=edit Svarita Deerga Svarita Anudatta eg Description of problem: This is not a bug, but enhancement request. Tamil language script is also used for writing other language text such as Sanskrit, Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu and Kannada in the form of transliteration. However Tamil script and the associated Unicode range U0B80-U0BFF does not contain many characters that are available in these other languages - mainly the Devanagari Extended unicode UA8E0 and Devanagari Vedic Extentions unicode U1CD0 series. Some such requests that I have come across in my FB and other groups: 1. How can I include the signs like lines above the letters as shown in the picture. This is required to show the swaram i.e. high or low pitch of pronouncing the letter/word as in Sanskrit. This kind of lines are used in Sanskrit also. 2. I need to type musical notations in Tamil Using MSword processor. To indicate octave we put a dot on top or bottom of the letter. how to add ? --- My answer for above point 2: dot above = anuswara, dot below = nukta, Lohit Tamil does not contain nukta, but includes anuswara (U+0B82). --- While its lot easier to juggle around in Linux based systems by switching between different fonts, its very difficult in MS based applications. Hence, I am requesting that 9 such frequently used Glyphs be 'added' to the existing Lohit Tamil font. The existing Glyphs from Lohit-Devanagari.ttf can be 'leveraged' for this, no need to reinvent the wheel. Replace: U+0310 COMBINING CANDRABINDU >>> replace with VEDIC TONE CANDRABINDU / anunasika U+0901, thats in Devanagari range, to be consistent with all other scrips. Add: Signs: Visarga U+0903 ( as separate and distinct, in addition to Tamil Visarga U+0B83 ) AVAGRAHA U+093D CANDRABINDU VIRAMA U+A8F3 Combining signs/marks with Anchoring: NUKTA U+093C VEDIC TONE UDATTA / SVARITA U+0951 VEDIC TONE ANUDATTA U+0952 VEDIC TONE PRENKHA U+1CD2 VEDIC TONE DOUBLE/Deerga SVARITA U+1CDA VEDIC TONE CANDRA U+1CF4 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Not a bug, but enhancement request. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 1533798] New: Support Bitcoin sign
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Nov '18

22 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533798 Bug ID: 1533798 Summary: Support Bitcoin sign Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: shanshandehongxing(a)outlook.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Unicode added Bitcoin sign (₿) in June 2017, and Microsoft gave update package to make Windows 10 support this sign, thus this sign become available in Arial, Calibri, Cambria, Consolas, Courier New, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI, Tahoma and Times New Roman. So I hope this sign become available in Liberation fonts as well. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1607997] New: Newer versions available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Nov '18

14 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607997 Bug ID: 1607997 Summary: Newer versions available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: google-croscore-fonts Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: rastus.vernon(a)protonmail.ch QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Fedora has Arimo 1.23, Cousine 1.20 and Tinos 1.23. Arimo 1.32, Cousine 1.22 and Tinos 1.32 are available from https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts/tree/master/hinted. Arimo has 708 new glyphs and Tinos has 706. It would be nice to have the newer versions in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1628832] New: Package cleanup required
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628832 Bug ID: 1628832 Summary: Package cleanup required Product: Fedora Version: 28 Component: julietaula-montserrat-fonts Severity: high Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Description of problem: At the moment 75 otf/ttf fonts has been packaged in single RPM. Improvement required. 1. Keep on .otf, remote .ttf. Its duplication. 2. Make two suppackages a) Montserrat-* b) MontserratAlternates-* Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): julietaula-montserrat-fonts-7.200-2.fc28.noarch How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. See fonts installed under ulietaula-montserrat-fonts 2. 3. Actual results: 1. It installing both ttf and otf. 2 2 families are installed under same packages. Expected results: 1. We do not required .ttf. 2. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts for subpackaging. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 1643607] New: julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts uninstallable
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643607 Bug ID: 1643607 Summary: julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts uninstallable Product: Fedora Version: 28 Component: julietaula-montserrat-fonts Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: phil(a)fifi.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Description of problem: julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts cannot be installed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts-1:7.200-4.fc28.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts Actual results: Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides julietaula-montserrat-fonts-common = 7.200-4.fc28 needed by julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts-1:7.200-4.fc28.noarch Expected results: julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts should be installed. Additional info: It seems that the dependency on julietaula-montserrat-fonts-common is missing the epoch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1579464] New: update breaks boot
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Nov '18

05 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579464 Bug ID: 1579464 Summary: update breaks boot Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontconfig Severity: high Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: contactopublico57(a)bol.com.br QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Description of problem:dnf update to fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64 produces boot failure. Additional package updates produce boot failure as noted below. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64 How reproducible: dnf update fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64 Steps to Reproduce: 1.dnf system update 2. 3. Actual results: dnf update installs fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64 reboot results in boot failure prior to loading lightdm-1.25.2-1.fc29.x86_64 with mate-desktop-1.20.1-5.fc29.x86_64. Expected results: boot to lightdm login manager/mate desktop Additional info: same behavior with dnf update of following additional packages: harfbuzz-1.7.5-3.fc29.x86_64 harfbuzz-icu-1.7.5-3.fc29.x86_64 Please advise if you need a separate bug report for the harfbuzz packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1644700] New: freetype with subpixel rendering enabled should Obsolete freetype-freeworld
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Nov '18

04 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644700 Bug ID: 1644700 Summary: freetype with subpixel rendering enabled should Obsolete freetype-freeworld Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: freetype Severity: low Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Please add: Obsoletes: freetype-freeworld < … for upgrade path from RPM Fusion Free. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype-2.9.1-5.fc29 freetype-2.9.1-5.fc30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1639379] New: freetype-devel transaction check fails for multilib
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Oct '18

30 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639379 Bug ID: 1639379 Summary: freetype-devel transaction check fails for multilib Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: freetype Severity: medium Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: jman012345(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When attempting to upgrade from Fedora 28 to 29, the 64-bit version of freetype-devel conflicts with the 32-bit version. Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/bin/freetype-config conflicts between attempted installs of freetype-devel-2.9.1-2.fc29.i686 and freetype-devel-2.9.1-2.fc29.x86_64 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.9.1-2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. From a fully updated Fedora 28 system: sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=29 2. Confirm packages to download and confirm gpg keys 3. Transaction check failure Actual results: Transaction check fails Expected results: Transaction check succeeds Additional info: Currently installed version of freetype-devel is 2.8-10. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1642743] i686 vs x86_64 collisions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Oct '18

29 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642743 Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed| |2018-10-29 12:31:01 --- Comment #3 from Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1639379 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1642743] i686 vs x86_64 collisions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Oct '18

29 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642743 Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax(a)redhat.com, | |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, | |jmracek(a)redhat.com, | |john.j5live(a)gmail.com, | |kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, | |mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, | |mclasen(a)redhat.com, | |mkasik(a)redhat.com, | |rhughes(a)redhat.com, | |rstrode(a)redhat.com, | |sandmann(a)redhat.com Component|dnf-plugin-system-upgrade |freetype Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |mkasik(a)redhat.com |.org | --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com> --- It looks like a packaging problem. The conflict between arch or rename of binary should help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1642082] New: fonttools-3.31.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Oct '18

25 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642082 Bug ID: 1642082 Summary: fonttools-3.31.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 3.31.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.29.0-1.fc29 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1641503] New: sil-andika-fonts-5.000.zip is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641503 Bug ID: 1641503 Summary: sil-andika-fonts-5.000.zip is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: sil-andika-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Latest upstream release: 5.000.zip Current version/release in rawhide: 1.0-20.fc29 URL: https://software.sil.org/andika/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4816/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1336042] New: Liberation Fonts not displayed correctly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '18

21 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336042 Bug ID: 1336042 Summary: Liberation Fonts not displayed correctly Product: Fedora Version: 24 Component: liberation-fonts Severity: high Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: freepenguin84(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1157360 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1157360&action=edit Screenshots to show the difference between Fedora 22 and 23/24 Description of problem: Liberation Fonts are not being diplayed correctly. This is obvious on websites where the text is shifted some pixel up compared to Fedora 22 and other OSes. Fedora 23 has the same issue. The source files for liberation font is the same in Fedora 22-24 but the output *.ttf files are different. Installing the RPMs from Fedora 22 in Fedora 24 fixes the problem. Maybe the output has changed due to updated build tools? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.07.4 How reproducible: Open Webpage in Firefox or Google Chrome Steps to Reproduce: Open https://github.com/solus-project/budgie-desktop in Firefox Actual results: Text is shifted upwards besides the images (see attached screenshot) Expected results: Text aligned with images (see attached screenshot) Additional info: https://plus.google.com/+ViktorPankraz/posts/L8KVUGEbHxz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 50

[Bug 1640809] New: Freetype-devel conflicts when having both the x86 and x64 version installed
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Oct '18

18 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640809 Bug ID: 1640809 Summary: Freetype-devel conflicts when having both the x86 and x64 version installed Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: freetype Severity: high Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: securetalk(a)sbmobilepilot.onmicrosoft.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com This bug blocks updating to Fedora 29 when affected with it, unless freetype-devel.i686 is removed before upgrading to F29. It's not present on prior releases and prevents building some SW properly too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs October 2018