[Bug 1545149] New: OTF/CFF conts no longer hinted horizontally
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545149
Bug ID: 1545149
Summary: OTF/CFF conts no longer hinted horizontally
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: freetype
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ossman(a)cendio.se
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
I upgraded from Fedora 26 to Fedora 27 and all of a sudden OTF/CFF fonts such
as Cantarell are no longer hinted horizontally, making them appear blurry and
out of focus.
A similar change was done for TTF fonts previously, but that could be reverted
by setting "FREETYPE_PROPERTIES=truetype:interpreter-version=35".
Is there a similar setting hidden for this latest change? The normal font
hinting settings have no effect on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 4 months
[Bug 1427550] New: Adding additional Glyphs in Tamil
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427550
Bug ID: 1427550
Summary: Adding additional Glyphs in Tamil
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: lohit-tamil-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: nsesha92(a)yahoo.co.in
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1258398
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1258398&action=edit
Svarita Deerga Svarita Anudatta eg
Description of problem:
This is not a bug, but enhancement request.
Tamil language script is also used for writing other language text such as
Sanskrit, Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu and Kannada in the form of transliteration.
However Tamil script and the associated Unicode range U0B80-U0BFF does not
contain many characters that are available in these other languages - mainly
the Devanagari Extended unicode UA8E0 and Devanagari Vedic
Extentions unicode U1CD0 series.
Some such requests that I have come across in my FB and other groups:
1. How can I include the signs like lines above the letters as shown in the
picture. This is required to show the swaram i.e. high or low pitch of
pronouncing the letter/word as in Sanskrit. This kind of lines are used in
Sanskrit also.
2. I need to type musical notations in Tamil Using MSword processor. To
indicate octave we put a dot on top or bottom of the letter. how to add ?
--- My answer for above point 2: dot above = anuswara, dot below = nukta, Lohit
Tamil does not contain nukta, but includes anuswara (U+0B82). ---
While its lot easier to juggle around in Linux based systems by switching
between different fonts, its very difficult in MS based applications.
Hence, I am requesting that 9 such frequently used Glyphs be 'added' to the
existing Lohit Tamil font. The existing Glyphs from Lohit-Devanagari.ttf can be
'leveraged' for this, no need to reinvent the wheel.
Replace:
U+0310 COMBINING CANDRABINDU >>> replace with VEDIC TONE CANDRABINDU /
anunasika U+0901, thats in Devanagari range, to be consistent with all other
scrips.
Add:
Signs:
Visarga U+0903 ( as separate and distinct, in addition to Tamil Visarga U+0B83
)
AVAGRAHA U+093D
CANDRABINDU VIRAMA U+A8F3
Combining signs/marks with Anchoring:
NUKTA U+093C
VEDIC TONE UDATTA / SVARITA U+0951
VEDIC TONE ANUDATTA U+0952
VEDIC TONE PRENKHA U+1CD2
VEDIC TONE DOUBLE/Deerga SVARITA U+1CDA
VEDIC TONE CANDRA U+1CF4
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Not a bug, but enhancement request.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 4 months
[Bug 1533798] New: Support Bitcoin sign
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533798
Bug ID: 1533798
Summary: Support Bitcoin sign
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: shanshandehongxing(a)outlook.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Unicode added Bitcoin sign (₿) in June 2017, and Microsoft gave update package
to make Windows 10 support this sign, thus this sign become available in Arial,
Calibri, Cambria, Consolas, Courier New, Microsoft Sans Serif, Segoe UI, Tahoma
and Times New Roman. So I hope this sign become available in Liberation fonts
as well.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 1607997] New: Newer versions available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607997
Bug ID: 1607997
Summary: Newer versions available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: google-croscore-fonts
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rastus.vernon(a)protonmail.ch
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Fedora has Arimo 1.23, Cousine 1.20 and Tinos 1.23. Arimo 1.32, Cousine 1.22
and Tinos 1.32 are available from
https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-fonts/tree/master/hinted. Arimo has 708 new
glyphs and Tinos has 706.
It would be nice to have the newer versions in Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 1628832] New: Package cleanup required
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628832
Bug ID: 1628832
Summary: Package cleanup required
Product: Fedora
Version: 28
Component: julietaula-montserrat-fonts
Severity: high
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Description of problem:
At the moment 75 otf/ttf fonts has been packaged in single RPM.
Improvement required.
1. Keep on .otf, remote .ttf. Its duplication.
2. Make two suppackages
a) Montserrat-*
b) MontserratAlternates-*
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
julietaula-montserrat-fonts-7.200-2.fc28.noarch
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See fonts installed under ulietaula-montserrat-fonts
2.
3.
Actual results:
1. It installing both ttf and otf.
2 2 families are installed under same packages.
Expected results:
1. We do not required .ttf.
2. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
for subpackaging.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 1643607] New: julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts
uninstallable
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643607
Bug ID: 1643607
Summary: julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts uninstallable
Product: Fedora
Version: 28
Component: julietaula-montserrat-fonts
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: phil(a)fifi.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Description of problem:
julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts cannot be installed.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts-1:7.200-4.fc28.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts
Actual results:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides julietaula-montserrat-fonts-common = 7.200-4.fc28 needed
by julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts-1:7.200-4.fc28.noarch
Expected results:
julietaula-montserrat-alternates-fonts should be installed.
Additional info:
It seems that the dependency on julietaula-montserrat-fonts-common is missing
the epoch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 1579464] New: update breaks boot
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579464
Bug ID: 1579464
Summary: update breaks boot
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: fontconfig
Severity: high
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: contactopublico57(a)bol.com.br
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:dnf update to fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64 produces
boot failure.
Additional package updates produce boot failure as noted below.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64
How reproducible:
dnf update fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64
Steps to Reproduce:
1.dnf system update
2.
3.
Actual results:
dnf update installs fontconfig-2.13.0-4.fc29.x86_64
reboot results in boot failure prior to loading lightdm-1.25.2-1.fc29.x86_64
with mate-desktop-1.20.1-5.fc29.x86_64.
Expected results:
boot to lightdm login manager/mate desktop
Additional info:
same behavior with dnf update of following additional packages:
harfbuzz-1.7.5-3.fc29.x86_64
harfbuzz-icu-1.7.5-3.fc29.x86_64
Please advise if you need a separate bug report for the harfbuzz packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 1644700] New:
freetype with subpixel rendering enabled should Obsolete freetype-freeworld
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644700
Bug ID: 1644700
Summary: freetype with subpixel rendering enabled should
Obsolete freetype-freeworld
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: freetype
Severity: low
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Please add:
Obsoletes: freetype-freeworld < …
for upgrade path from RPM Fusion Free.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.9.1-5.fc29
freetype-2.9.1-5.fc30
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 1639379] New: freetype-devel transaction check fails for
multilib
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639379
Bug ID: 1639379
Summary: freetype-devel transaction check fails for multilib
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Component: freetype
Severity: medium
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jman012345(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When attempting to upgrade from Fedora 28 to 29, the 64-bit version of
freetype-devel conflicts with the 32-bit version.
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/bin/freetype-config conflicts between attempted installs of
freetype-devel-2.9.1-2.fc29.i686 and freetype-devel-2.9.1-2.fc29.x86_64
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.9.1-2
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. From a fully updated Fedora 28 system: sudo dnf system-upgrade download
--releasever=29
2. Confirm packages to download and confirm gpg keys
3. Transaction check failure
Actual results:
Transaction check fails
Expected results:
Transaction check succeeds
Additional info:
Currently installed version of freetype-devel is 2.8-10.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 1642743] i686 vs x86_64 collisions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642743
Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed| |2018-10-29 12:31:01
--- Comment #3 from Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1639379 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 5 months