October 2018 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642743 Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax(a)redhat.com, | |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, | |jmracek(a)redhat.com, | |john.j5live(a)gmail.com, | |kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, | |mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, | |mclasen(a)redhat.com, | |mkasik(a)redhat.com, | |rhughes(a)redhat.com, | |rstrode(a)redhat.com, | |sandmann(a)redhat.com Component|dnf-plugin-system-upgrade |freetype Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |mkasik(a)redhat.com |.org | --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com> --- It looks like a packaging problem. The conflict between arch or rename of binary should help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1642082] New: fonttools-3.31.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642082 Bug ID: 1642082 Summary: fonttools-3.31.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 3.31.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.29.0-1.fc29 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1641503] New: sil-andika-fonts-5.000.zip is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641503 Bug ID: 1641503 Summary: sil-andika-fonts-5.000.zip is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: sil-andika-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Latest upstream release: 5.000.zip Current version/release in rawhide: 1.0-20.fc29 URL: https://software.sil.org/andika/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4816/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1336042] New: Liberation Fonts not displayed correctly

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336042 Bug ID: 1336042 Summary: Liberation Fonts not displayed correctly Product: Fedora Version: 24 Component: liberation-fonts Severity: high Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: freepenguin84(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1157360 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1157360&action=edit Screenshots to show the difference between Fedora 22 and 23/24 Description of problem: Liberation Fonts are not being diplayed correctly. This is obvious on websites where the text is shifted some pixel up compared to Fedora 22 and other OSes. Fedora 23 has the same issue. The source files for liberation font is the same in Fedora 22-24 but the output *.ttf files are different. Installing the RPMs from Fedora 22 in Fedora 24 fixes the problem. Maybe the output has changed due to updated build tools? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.07.4 How reproducible: Open Webpage in Firefox or Google Chrome Steps to Reproduce: Open https://github.com/solus-project/budgie-desktop in Firefox Actual results: Text is shifted upwards besides the images (see attached screenshot) Expected results: Text aligned with images (see attached screenshot) Additional info: https://plus.google.com/+ViktorPankraz/posts/L8KVUGEbHxz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

2
50
0 / 0

[Bug 1640809] New: Freetype-devel conflicts when having both the x86 and x64 version installed

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640809 Bug ID: 1640809 Summary: Freetype-devel conflicts when having both the x86 and x64 version installed Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: freetype Severity: high Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com Reporter: securetalk(a)sbmobilepilot.onmicrosoft.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com This bug blocks updating to Fedora 29 when affected with it, unless freetype-devel.i686 is removed before upgrading to F29. It's not present on prior releases and prevents building some SW properly too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1634245] New: fontconfig-2.12.91 caused wqy-zeihei-fonts lost it' s Chinese font name in `fc-list` output

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634245 Bug ID: 1634245 Summary: fontconfig-2.12.91 caused wqy-zeihei-fonts lost it's Chinese font name in `fc-list` output Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: lovetide(a)qq.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Description of problem: After I upgraded to Fedora 28 from Fedora 27, I found the font displayed in my MATE desktop is not what I configured before, so I try to reconfigured, but I can't found the font name "文泉驿点阵正黑" anymore, (this made Chinese characters in images generated by gnuplot ("文泉驿点阵正黑" font named specifed) unreadable), but I do found it's alternative font name "WenQuanYi Zei Hei Sharp". Also, I tried the recent released Fedora 29 Beta live CD, same issue still exists. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.12.91-1.fc28 + How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot from Fedora 28 or Fedora 29 Beta Live CD, and config the network to make sure it can access internet. 2. Install wqy-zenhei-fonts (issue `su` then `dnf install wqy-zenhei-fonts` in terminal) 3. Issue `LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 fc-list | grep -i wqy-zenhei.ttc` Actual results: # fc-list | grep -i wqy-zenhei.ttc /usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: WenQuanYi Zen Hei:style=Regular /usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: WenQuanYi Zen Hei Sharp,文泉驛點陣正黑:style=Regular /usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: WenQuanYi Zen Hei Mono:style=Regular Expected results: (this is from Fedora 27, with fontconfig 2.12.6-4.fc27) # fc-list | grep -i wqy-zenhei.ttc /usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: 文泉驿点阵正黑,文泉驛點陣正黑,WenQuanYi Zen Hei Sharp:style=Regular /usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: 文泉驿等宽正黑,文泉驛等寬正黑,WenQuanYi Zen Hei Mono:style=Regular /usr/share/fonts/wqy-zenhei/wqy-zenhei.ttc: 文泉驿正黑,文泉驛正黑,WenQuanYi Zen Hei:style=Regular Additional info: * Fedora 27 does not have this issue. Lastest fontconfig version in Fedora 27 is 2.12.6-4.fc27 * Fedora 29 Live CD still have this issue * Interesting thing, adobe-source-han-sans-cn font is not affected: # fc-list | grep -i 思源黑体 ... /usr/share/fonts/adobe-source-han-sans-cn/SourceHanSansCN-Normal.otf: 思源黑体 CN,Source Han Sans CN Normal,Source Han Sans CN:style=Normal,Regular ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1634872] New: woffTools: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+: python2-woffTools

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634872 Bug ID: 1634872 Summary: woffTools: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+: python2-woffTools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: woffTools Assignee: sshedmak(a)redhat.com Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cstratak(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, pviktori(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Blocks: 1625773 (PY2REMOVAL) In line with the Mass Python 2 Package Removal [0], the following (sub)packages of woffTools were marked for removal: * python2-woffTools According to our query, those (sub)packages only provide a Python 2 importable module. If this is not true, please tell us why, so we can fix our query. Please remove them from your package. As said in the change document, if there is no objection in a week, we will remove the package(s) as soon as we get to it. This change might not match your packaging style, so we'd prefer if you did the change. If you need more time, please let us know here. We hope this doesn't come to you as a surprise. If you want to know our motivation for this, please read the change document [0]. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625773 [Bug 1625773] Mass Python 2 Package Removal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1380754] New: Missing kerning pair for the Czech language ďá

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380754 Bug ID: 1380754 Summary: Missing kerning pair for the Czech language ďá Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: mcepl(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1206277 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1206277&action=edit illustration of the problem Description of problem: This is just to record the unfortunate missing kerning pair for ďá (used in Czech, for example “devil” is “ďábel”). I will try to investigate which other kerning pairs are missing. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): scholarsfonts-cardo-fonts-1.045-12.el7.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1.print the standard Czech pangram “Příliš žluťoučký kůň úpěl ďábelské ódy.” 2. 3. Actual results: space between ď and á in the word “ďábelské” is awful Expected results: It shouldn't be Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

2
8
0 / 0

[Bug 525872] New: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525872 Summary: Please rebuild using external Adobe CMap and AGLFN data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: qt AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, than(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, ltinkl(a)redhat.com Blocks: 182235,473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The Debian fonttool packager noticed a problem in fonttool's embedded Adobe CMap and AGLFN data and got Adobe to release them under a good license This data is embeded in many packages, including yours Please rebuild your package using an external shared Adobe CMap and AGLFN data package FE-LEGAL since this was all triggered by a legal checl Debian-side See also http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/ http://lwn.net/Articles/354360/ http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/cmap/CMap+Resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

2
20
0 / 0

[Bug 1553702] New: Digit zero with an oblique strike instead of inside dot

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553702 Bug ID: 1553702 Summary: Digit zero with an oblique strike instead of inside dot Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: mailinglists35(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I'd wish to have a version of the monospaced font (Liberation Mono) where digit zero has an oblique strike instead of inside dot. The dot version makes it difficult to me to distinguish it from the digit eight Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: looking at the display Steps to Reproduce: 1. look at digit zero displayed with Liberation Mono font 2. 3. Actual results: See a version with a dot in the middle of the shape Expected results: See a version with an oblique strike crossing the shape Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
11
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs October 2018