[Bug 1271620] New: please update spec templates as per latest
guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271620
Bug ID: 1271620
Summary: please update spec templates as per latest guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: fontpackages
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: kvolny(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I'm trying to package a font. While filing the spec template, I have found that
there is:
%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}
but the buildroot is now cleaned automatically so the `rm` command should not
be present.
Please update the spec templates according to the latest guidelines. Also note
that there may be other deviations from current packaging guidelines that I
have overlooked ...
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontpackages-devel-1.44-14.fc23.noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=162cGuTqJk&a=cc_unsubscribe
5 years, 10 months
[Bug 1544776] New: CVE-2018-6942 freetype:
NULL pointer dereference in the Ins_GETVARIATION() function [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544776
Bug ID: 1544776
Summary: CVE-2018-6942 freetype: NULL pointer dereference in
the Ins_GETVARIATION() function [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: freetype
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: low
Priority: low
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: anemec(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only
one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at
the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other,
you may clone this bug as appropriate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 10 months
[Bug 1544774] New: CVE-2018-6942 freetype:
NULL pointer dereference in the Ins_GETVARIATION() function [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544774
Bug ID: 1544774
Summary: CVE-2018-6942 freetype: NULL pointer dereference in
the Ins_GETVARIATION() function [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 27
Component: freetype
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: low
Priority: low
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: anemec(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only
one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at
the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other,
you may clone this bug as appropriate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 10 months
[Bug 1571522] New: Reduce fontconfig priority to higher than 65
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571522
Bug ID: 1571522
Summary: Reduce fontconfig priority to higher than 65
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: google-droid-fonts
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Description of problem:
Droid Sans fonts currently have high priority of 65 in Fedora
and since the fonts get pulled in libgs they are now installed by default...
Can the priority of the fonts please be reduced (eg increased to 66 or higher)?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
google-droid-fonts-20120715-13.fc28
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot F28 Live WS
2. $ fc-match :lang=th
Actual results:
DroidSansThai is default for Thai
Expected results:
Thai Scalable Waree should be default
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 11 months
[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> ---
Removing the font will break formatting of all existing documents that use it
since other emoji fonts will have different metrics. You can not remove old
fonts because better one appeared, no one wants to re-layout existing
documents.
Symbola is a dead end since it just changed licensing to non-free
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 11 months
[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696
Jeremy Bicha <jbicha(a)ubuntu.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(jbicha(a)ubuntu.com |
|) |
--- Comment #8 from Jeremy Bicha <jbicha(a)ubuntu.com> ---
If it's not good as an emoji font then what's the point of keeping it in
Fedora? The package literally has no other purpose.
Emoji fonts are different than regular fonts. If they are not updated every
single year (with the current pace for Unicode), then they will quickly become
out of date and useless.
As was recommended in comment #1, I suggest the Symbola font if someone wants a
black and white font. This is what is offered by default in Kubuntu since Qt
doesn't fully support color emoji.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 11 months
[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696
Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jbicha(a)ubuntu.com
Flags| |needinfo?(jbicha(a)ubuntu.com
| |)
--- Comment #7 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> ---
The difficulty, here, is that I’m not convinced, and I’m the one who’d be
volunteering my time to doing the work.
We have lots of fonts that haven’t been updated for years, but that doesn’t
necessarily make them useless. I agree it’s not a great emoji font nowadays,
but, users being users, I expect some have a preference for it nonetheless.
The package takes little to no effort to keep, and, as far as I’m aware, isn’t
harmful.
Can you change my mind?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 11 months
[Bug 1509696] Drop google-android-emoji-fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509696
Jeremy Bicha <jbicha(a)ubuntu.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy Bicha <jbicha(a)ubuntu.com> ---
With all due respect, I am reopening this bug.
The initial bug description still stands and this package should not be
provided in Fedora any more.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 years, 11 months