[Bug 1727602] New: Fedora flatpak for this app on
registry.fedoraproject.org
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727602
Bug ID: 1727602
Summary: Fedora flatpak for this app on
registry.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontforge
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: 7d28c752(a)opayq.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
It would be great if you could provide a flatpak package of this app to
https://registry.fedoraproject.org/.
Especially for users of Fedora Silverblue https://silverblue.fedoraproject.org/
this then allows a seamless installation and upgrades without rebooting the
system (just restarting the application).
Additionally, flatpaks can of course be installed on any distro, so also
non-Fedora users could use it too.
More details:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Flatpaks
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Flatpaks
I know this app is available on Flathub as a flatpak, but I still prefer
Fedora's package testing/QA etc., that's why I'd also like to have a version on
https://registry.fedoraproject.org/. Also Flathub is a third-party source from
the Fedora users/projects viewpoint, so I guess some users would not like to
use third-party app sources.
However, the fact that it is on Flathub should make it easier for you to
implement this, because you can have a look on how they do it. (Not that you
need to do everything in the same way, but it proves it is possible to package
as a flatpak, at least.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 months, 4 weeks
[Bug 1678974] New: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678974
Bug ID: 1678974
Summary: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: libfontenc
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: btissoir(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, btissoir(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.1.4
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1.3-10.fc30
URL: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/lib/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/1613/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 months, 3 weeks
[Bug 1660284] New: IndexError: list index out of range
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1660284
Bug ID: 1660284
Summary: IndexError: list index out of range
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fonttools
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
/usr/bin/fonttools dumps a traceback when calling.
$ fonttools
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/bin/fonttools", line 11, in <module>
load_entry_point('fonttools==3.32.0', 'console_scripts', 'fonttools')()
File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/fontTools/__main__.py", line 24, in
main
mod = 'fontTools.'+sys.argv[1]
IndexError: list index out of range
That would be better if that can shows more helpful usage or so.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonttools-3.32.0-1.fc30.noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 5 months
[Bug 1707723] New: meta package to require Sans, Serif and Mono
subpackages
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707723
Bug ID: 1707723
Summary: meta package to require Sans, Serif and Mono
subpackages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: dejavu-fonts
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
peter(a)thecodergeek.com, redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
There may be disagreement but I think it might be nice if dejavu-fonts provided
a metapackage to pull in dejavu-sans-fonts, dejavu-serif-fonts and
dejavu-sans-mono-fonts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 10 months
[Bug 1703849] New: [pango] pango-view fails for backend ft2 because
of missing dependency on ImageMagick
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703849
Bug ID: 1703849
Summary: [pango] pango-view fails for backend ft2 because of
missing dependency on ImageMagick
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jfrieben(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Using pango-view with backend ft2 in a current Fedora 29 Workstation
installation fails because pango-view tries to launch the display utility from
ImageMagick which has not been pulled in as a dependency.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.42.4-2.fc29
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Launch GNOME session of a current Fedora 29 Workstation installation.
2. Run 'pango-view --backend=ft2 -t PANGO'.
Actual results:
Utility pango-view aborts with the error message:
"pango-view: When running ImageMagick 'display' command: Failed to execute
child process “display” (No such file or directory)"
Expected results:
Utility pango-view displays the sample text.
Additional info:
- Installing package ImageMagick prior to running pango-view ensures correct
execution. Therefore, adding ImageMagick as a requirement of package pango
solves this issue.
- It is probably preferable to patch pango-view such that it calls "gm display"
from package GraphicsMagick and to pull in the latter instead of ImageMagick.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 11 months
[Bug 1725983] New: freetype-2.10.1 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725983
Bug ID: 1725983
Summary: freetype-2.10.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: freetype
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 2.10.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.10.0-2.fc31
URL: https://www.freetype.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/854/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 2 months
[Bug 1667951] New: google-roboto-mono-fonts is needed in rawhide
(f30)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667951
Bug ID: 1667951
Summary: google-roboto-mono-fonts is needed in rawhide (f30)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: google-roboto-mono-fonts
Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: mgansser(a)online.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
need the package for a review in rawhide (f30).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 1707734] New: fc-validate should return non-zero value when
missing glyph for language coverage
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707734
Bug ID: 1707734
Summary: fc-validate should return non-zero value when missing
glyph for language coverage
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pwu(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When use fc-validate to check missing glyph for language coverage,
if some glyphs are missing, fc-validate still returns zero value.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.13.1-3.fc29.x86_64
How reproducible:
Run fc-validate -l zh_cn
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc
and fc-validate -l th /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run fc-validate against some fonts which missing glyph coverage
Actual results:
fc-validate returns zero value.
Expected results:
fc-validate returns non-zero value if any font face missing glyph coverage.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 1707712] New: liberation-fonts.noarch should not Provides or
Obsoletes liberation-narrow fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707712
Bug ID: 1707712
Summary: liberation-fonts.noarch should not Provides or
Obsoletes liberation-narrow fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
This may be due to unclear wording in the Packaging Guidelines
but liberation-fonts should not Provides or Obsoletes liberation-narrow-fonts.
In fact is basically to install liberation-narrow-fonts in Fedora because of
this. ;-)
The Obsoletes made sense before liberation-narrow-fonts was reintroduced to
Fedora (except the upperbound is far to high).
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to install liberation-narrow-fonts
# dnf install liberation-narrow-fonts
Actual results:
liberation-fonts gets installed
Expected results:
liberation-narrow-fonts
Additional info:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-re...
"If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a
sufficiently compatible replacement as defined above, use only the Obsoletes:
line from the above example."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years