fonts-bugs September 2019

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
81 discussions

[Bug 1736653] New: shadowsintolight-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f31
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Sep '19

22 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736653 Bug ID: 1736653 Summary: shadowsintolight-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f31 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: shadowsintolight-fonts Assignee: jujens(a)jujens.eu Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jujens(a)jujens.eu Blocks: 1732841 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora shadowsintolight-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f31 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36637611 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Please fix shadowsintolight-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, shadowsintolight-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 32, shadowsintolight-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732841 [Bug 1732841] (F31FTBFS) - Fedora 31 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1736695] New: specialelite-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f31
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Sep '19

22 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736695 Bug ID: 1736695 Summary: specialelite-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f31 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: specialelite-fonts Assignee: jujens(a)jujens.eu Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jujens(a)jujens.eu Blocks: 1732841 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora specialelite-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f31 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36637678 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Please fix specialelite-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, specialelite-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 32, specialelite-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732841 [Bug 1732841] (F31FTBFS) - Fedora 31 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1707734] New: fc-validate should return non-zero value when missing glyph for language coverage
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 Sep '19

20 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707734 Bug ID: 1707734 Summary: fc-validate should return non-zero value when missing glyph for language coverage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: pwu(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When use fc-validate to check missing glyph for language coverage, if some glyphs are missing, fc-validate still returns zero value. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.13.1-3.fc29.x86_64 How reproducible: Run fc-validate -l zh_cn /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc and fc-validate -l th /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc Steps to Reproduce: 1. run fc-validate against some fonts which missing glyph coverage Actual results: fc-validate returns zero value. Expected results: fc-validate returns non-zero value if any font face missing glyph coverage. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1751048] New: CVE-2019-15785 fontforge: buffer overflow in PrefsUI_LoadPrefs in prefs.c
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Sep '19

19 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751048 Bug ID: 1751048 Summary: CVE-2019-15785 fontforge: buffer overflow in PrefsUI_LoadPrefs in prefs.c Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: darunesh(a)redhat.com CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other A vulnerability was found in FontForge through 20190801 has a buffer overflow in PrefsUI_LoadPrefs in prefs.c. Reference: https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/pull/3886 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 1543407] fontawesome-fonts-5.11.1 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543407 --- Comment #28 from Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> --- The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source declarations if possible. - fontawesome-fonts-fontconfig.conf - README-Trademarks.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1543407] fontawesome-fonts-5.11.1 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543407 Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|fontawesome-fonts-5.11.0 is |fontawesome-fonts-5.11.1 is |available |available --- Comment #27 from Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Latest upstream release: 5.11.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.7.0-7.fc31 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1543407] fontawesome-fonts-5.11.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543407 --- Comment #26 from Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> --- The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source declarations if possible. - fontawesome-fonts-fontconfig.conf - README-Trademarks.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1543407] fontawesome-fonts-5.11.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543407 Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|fontawesome-fonts-5.10.2 is |fontawesome-fonts-5.11.0 is |available |available --- Comment #25 from Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Latest upstream release: 5.11.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.7.0-7.fc31 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1751050] New: CVE-2019-15785 fontforge: buffer overflow in PrefsUI_LoadPrefs in prefs.c [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751050 Bug ID: 1751050 Summary: CVE-2019-15785 fontforge: buffer overflow in PrefsUI_LoadPrefs in prefs.c [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 30 Status: NEW Component: fontforge Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com Reporter: darunesh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of fedora-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1748803] New: liberation-fonts.noarch should pull in liberation-*-fonts or be dropped
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '19

17 Sep '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748803 Bug ID: 1748803 Summary: liberation-fonts.noarch should pull in liberation-*-fonts or be dropped Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: liberation-fonts.noarch is an empty package which does nothing. It should pull in its subpackages (or otherwise be dropped). How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install liberation-fonts Actual results: no files installed Expected results: liberation-sans, liberation-serif-fonts, liberation-mono-fonts to be pulled in. (Maybe even liberation-narrow-fonts??) Additional info: I think this is already the case in RHEL: we should the same in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs September 2019