fonts-bugs January 2020

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
62 discussions

[Bug 1786199] New: build of google-roboto-fonts for EPEL 8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 Jan '20

20 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786199 Bug ID: 1786199 Summary: build of google-roboto-fonts for EPEL 8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: google-roboto-fonts Assignee: dtardon(a)redhat.com Reporter: breno(a)tembosocial.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dtardon(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, I would like to ask a build of google-roboto-fonts for EPEL 8. Would you mind requesting the branches and build them? I've built them myself for testing, no issues at all. Please, let me know if I can be of any help. Thank you very much. - Breno -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1788778] New: fonttools-4.2.3 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Jan '20

18 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788778 Bug ID: 1788778 Summary: fonttools-4.2.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 4.2.3 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.2.2-1.fc32 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1791404] New: DejaVu font packages have wrong URL
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Jan '20

15 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791404 Bug ID: 1791404 Summary: DejaVu font packages have wrong URL Product: Fedora Version: 31 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Component: dejavu-fonts Severity: low Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: matt(a)nightrealms.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, peter(a)thecodergeek.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The DejaVu font packages currently point to http://dejavu-fonts.org/, which is now an ad-laden parked domain. It should point to the current DejaVu project URL, https://dejavu-fonts.github.io/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1748495] The terminus font is no longer found by gvim, so text files come up with glyphs instead of characters.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748495 Bug 1748495 depends on bug 1787668, which changed state. Bug 1787668 Summary: fonttosfnt update required for converting bitmap fonts to OpenType bitmap (*.otb) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787668 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1787668] New: fonttosfnt update required for converting bitmap fonts to OTB
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787668 Bug ID: 1787668 Summary: fonttosfnt update required for converting bitmap fonts to OTB Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: xorg-x11-font-utils Assignee: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com Reporter: rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: airlied(a)redhat.com, ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jglisse(a)redhat.com, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, negativo17(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, xgl-maint(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: fonttosfnt needs a few fixes and improvements from upstream and maybe upstream's pull requests to properly generate *.otb files from legacy bitmap font files. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-font-utils-7.5-42.fc31.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. fonttosfnt -b -c -g 2 -m 2 -o terminusn.otb ter-u*n.bdf Actual results: Weird spacing with the *.otb font. Expected results: Proper spacing with the *.otb font. Additional info: The details can be found at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753295 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748495 which I will summarized them properly in this bug later, but first we need a bug for this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1542331] Please update for for new version
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jan '20

10 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542331 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(psatpute(a)redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> --- +1 with what nim says. * Unfortunately upstream has remained unpredictable with release pattern. Good to ask once upstream about their plan from release perspective. * If they are going to follow same release pattern in future, good to go as per guidelines, infact this is good refresh for paktype after sometime. Thanks Vishal for taking this up. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1542331] Please update for for new version
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jan '20

10 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542331 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> --- If upstream does not want to publish the font files separately anymore yes that will require subpackaging. But, in that case, I would avise waiting for FPC to be done on https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/934 as that will significantly simplify the font subpackaging mecanisms available in Fedora (of course FPC is slooooooow; feel free to ping them in pagure) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1542331] Please update for for new version
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jan '20

10 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542331 vishalvvr <vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.c | |om Flags| |needinfo?(psatpute(a)redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #6 from vishalvvr <vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com> --- PakType font package previously had individual(paktype-ajrak, paktype-naskh-basic, paktype-naqsh, paktype-tehreer) font releases, so paktype-fonts(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/paktype-fonts) was split into https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/paktype-tehreer-fonts https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/paktype-ajrak-fonts https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/paktype-naqsh-fonts https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/paktype-naskh-basic-fonts But now the latest release has single release tar ball https://sourceforge.net/projects/paktype/files Are we planning to sub package paktype-fonts or continue current state? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1748495] The terminus font is no longer found by gvim, so text files come up with glyphs instead of characters.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748495 Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1753295 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753295 [Bug 1753295] Pango no longer supports bitmap fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1748495] The terminus font is no longer found by gvim, so text files come up with glyphs instead of characters.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748495 Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1787668 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787668 [Bug 1787668] fonttosfnt update required for converting bitmap fonts to OpenType bitmap (*.otb) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs January 2020