fonts-bugs April 2020

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
126 discussions

[Bug 1786596] New: Vertical alignment is off with PANGO_GRAVITY_EAST and PANGO_GRAVITY_HINT_LINE
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 Aug '21

26 Aug '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786596 Bug ID: 1786596 Summary: Vertical alignment is off with PANGO_GRAVITY_EAST and PANGO_GRAVITY_HINT_LINE Product: Fedora Version: 31 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: pango Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com Reporter: abetakehiko(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Japanese chars and Latin chars in the same line do not vertically align when the pango context's gravity is set to PANGO_GRAVITY_EAST and its hint set to PANGO_GRAVITY_HINT_LINE. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.44.7-1.fc31.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: pango-view --text="あーいうえお abcde" --gravity east --gravity-hint line --font="NotoSerifJP 24" Actual results: Japanese chars and Latin chars in the same line do not vertically align. Expected results: Japanese chars and Latin chars in the same line vertically align as before. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1752788] New: CVE-2015-9381 freetype: a heap-based buffer over-read in T1_Get_Private_Dict in type1/t1parse.c leading to information disclosure
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 02 Jun '21

02 Jun '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752788 Bug ID: 1752788 Summary: CVE-2015-9381 freetype: a heap-based buffer over-read in T1_Get_Private_Dict in type1/t1parse.c leading to information disclosure Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: mrehak(a)redhat.com CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other FreeType before 2.6.1 has a heap-based buffer over-read in T1_Get_Private_Dict in type1/t1parse.c. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1774474] New: Missing some coverage in certain variants
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774474 Bug ID: 1774474 Summary: Missing some coverage in certain variants Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: dejavu-fonts Severity: low Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, peter(a)thecodergeek.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I'm expecting to see same glyph coverage to all variants available in the package but apparently not. this is just a result running some test cases with fc-validate against languages which is expectedly or unexpectedly supposed to assign dejavu as a default font for. See logs stored in the following link for more details. that demonstrates this issue. https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/rest/organizations… Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.37-2.fc31 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.fc-validate -l <lang> /path/to/fonts 2. 3. Actual results: (One of) snippet from logs: [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: FAIL: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf doesn't satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf satisfy ab language coverage. [2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] Run test ab: done. Test's exit code: 0 Expected results: ExtraLight should have same coverage. Additional info: As it is an experimental, this may be an RFE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1813230] New: [RFE] ghostscript add support for variable fonts from fontconfig
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813230 Bug ID: 1813230 Summary: [RFE] ghostscript add support for variable fonts from fontconfig Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Version: 8.4 Status: NEW Component: ghostscript Assignee: zdohnal(a)redhat.com Reporter: zdohnal(a)redhat.com QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons(a)redhat.com CC: cosimo.cecchi(a)gmail.com, dkaspar(a)redhat.com, extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ian(a)ianweller.org, jsteiner(a)redhat.com, klember(a)redhat.com, me(a)fale.io, mosvald(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com, twaugh(a)redhat.com, zdohnal(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1813187 Target Milestone: rc Classification: Red Hat Pool ID: sst_cs_infra_services_rhel_8 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1813187 +++ Description of problem: During investigating https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722900 was found the font mentioned in summary fails with mismatch on FcPatternGetInteger() from fontconfig when gs asks for FC_WEIGHT value. I'm not sure whether the font or fontconfig is at fault, so I'm filing the issue on font package. I'm willing to help with debug, if needed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): abattis-cantarell-fonts-0:0.201-2.fc32.noarch fontconfig-2.13.92-6.fc32.x86_64 ghostscript-9.50-1.fc32 Steps to Reproduce: 1. gs -dNODISPLAY -dBATCH nasmdoc.ps Actual results: You can see in logs a message: DEBUG: FC_WEIGHT didn't match in /usr/share/fonts/cantarell/Cantarell-VF.otf Expected results: No such message Additional info: --- Additional comment from Kalev Lember on 2020-03-13 08:32:41 UTC --- Sorry, I don't know much about fonts and don't think I can be of much help debugging this. Can you ask Jakub and/or Tagoh if they know what's going on (CCd)? --- Additional comment from Nicolas Mailhot on 2020-03-13 08:42:52 UTC --- On the fontconfig side, that’s basically bug https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/issues/222 No idea if gs also contains problematic weight assumptions, invalidated by the introduction of variable fonts. On the packaging side cantarell has probably not been converted to new font packaging guidelines yet. It needs some name fixing (use of a space-free ExtraBold qualifier, removal of Regular in Name ID 4 for the Regular face, making NameID 4 consistent with Name ID 17 for other faces). Though except for the ExtraBold part, everything else will going to be workarounded in future fontconfig versions. --- Additional comment from Nicolas Mailhot on 2020-03-13 08:52:38 UTC --- (Also fontconfig exposes a generic meta face for variable fonts, this face does not have any specific weight, it gives the weight scale for the whole family) --- Additional comment from Akira TAGOH on 2020-03-13 08:58:05 UTC --- That isn't related to this. I don't know how ghostscript collects fonts from fontconfig though (probably using FcFontList()?), the problem here would be that they have dealt with a meta face as a normal face which has true in FC_VARIABLE and contains a weight in range but not integer. That's not a bug in font nor fontconfig. --- Additional comment from Zdenek Dohnal on 2020-03-13 09:25:03 UTC --- Hi Akira, yes, you're right, gs uses FcFontlist() - does the following to get font list: ----------------------------------------------------- /* load the font set that we'll iterate over */ pat = FcPatternBuild(NULL, FC_OUTLINE, FcTypeBool, 1, FC_SCALABLE, FcTypeBool, 1, NULL); os = FcObjectSetBuild(FC_FILE, FC_OUTLINE, FC_FAMILY, FC_WEIGHT, FC_SLANT, NULL); state->font_list = FcFontList(0, pat, os); ----------------------------------------------------- then when it enumerates the fonts it calls (f.e. for FC_WEIGHT): result = FcPatternGetInteger (font, FC_WEIGHT, 0, &weight_fc); (similar thing for FC_FILE, FC_FAMILY, FC_SLANT, FC_OUTLINE). Would you mind telling me/pointing me to a manual how to deal with it correctly, if it is not a problem of font/fontconfig? --- Additional comment from Akira TAGOH on 2020-03-13 10:07:42 UTC --- If ghostscript has no plans to support variable fonts or a plan to support only named-instances, you can set false to FC_VARIABLE as a query pattern; that should be more simple and easier than your patch applied in ghostscript; you can take care of the named-instances in VF font files as same as usual face then. otherwise set FcDontCare to FC_VARIABLE and need more changes in the code to deal with non-named-instances perhaps. The meta face which you faced the issue this time provides such information instead of providing it as one of faces because there are so many patterns to enummerate everything and quite hard to do. the targetted properties such as FC_WEIGHT, FC_WIDTH and FC_SIZE has a value in FcRange which means they can use an unique value between them. Unfortunately there are no more detailed document though, pango source code may helps how to deal with them. --- Additional comment from Akira TAGOH on 2020-03-13 10:16:22 UTC --- You can see what values the meta face provides. try fc-list -b -v Cantarell:variable=true for example. --- Additional comment from Zdenek Dohnal on 2020-03-13 10:40:41 UTC --- IMO they are not aware of the fact the variable fonts need a special care when are used from fontconfig. I'll check with upstream about variable fonts then. Thank you for the info! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813187 [Bug 1813187] ghostscript does not load variable fonts from fontconfig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1813187] New: Cantarell-VF.otf fails on fontconfig's FcPatternGetInteger() call for FC_WEIGHT
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813187 Bug ID: 1813187 Summary: Cantarell-VF.otf fails on fontconfig's FcPatternGetInteger() call for FC_WEIGHT Product: Fedora Version: 32 Status: NEW Component: abattis-cantarell-fonts Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: zdohnal(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cosimo.cecchi(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ian(a)ianweller.org, klember(a)redhat.com, me(a)fale.io Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: During investigating https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722900 was found the font mentioned in summary fails with mismatch on FcPatternGetInteger() from fontconfig when gs asks for FC_WEIGHT value. I'm not sure whether the font or fontconfig is at fault, so I'm filing the issue on font package. I'm willing to help with debug, if needed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): abattis-cantarell-fonts-0:0.201-2.fc32.noarch fontconfig-2.13.92-6.fc32.x86_64 ghostscript-9.50-1.fc32 Steps to Reproduce: 1. gs -dNODISPLAY -dBATCH nasmdoc.ps Actual results: You can see in logs a message: DEBUG: FC_WEIGHT didn't match in /usr/share/fonts/cantarell/Cantarell-VF.otf Expected results: No such message Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 1799156] New: apanov-edrip-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799156 Bug ID: 1799156 Summary: apanov-edrip-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: apanov-edrip-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk Blocks: 1750908 (F32FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora apanov-edrip-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f32 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41315838 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild Please fix apanov-edrip-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, apanov-edrip-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 33, apanov-edrip-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750908 [Bug 1750908] Fedora 32 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 1753295] New: Pango no longer supports bitmap fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753295 Bug ID: 1753295 Summary: Pango no longer supports bitmap fonts Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: pango Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: jsbillin(a)umich.edu QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: In pango 1.44, pango dropped support for bitmap fonts, so font packages like terminus-fonts and ucs-miscfixed-fonts no longer appear in GNOME applications that use pango, such as Terminal. If you did a dnf system-upgrade from Fedora 30 and were using a bitmap font like Terminus, all your terminals will show the rectangular placeholders the first time you start a terminal. Bitmap fonts like terminus and ucs-miscfixed are much easier to read in a terminal since they are pixel perfect. If Fedora 31 is going to disable support for bitmap fonts, it needs to be announced and the package maintainers of those bitmap font packages are going to need to find a way to convert their fonts. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.44.6-1.fc31.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install 'terminus-fonts' 2. Start GNOME terminal 3. Open Terminal Preferences 4. Attempt to change the font to Terminus font Actual results: If you upgraded from Fedora 30 and had Terminus fonts as the default font, the first time you launch Terminal, all the text will be the rectangular placeholders. If you search for the Terminus font in the preferences, you won't be able to find it. Expected results: Use the Terminus font as usual Additional info: It appears that pango switched from using FreeType to HarfBuzz, which only supports truetype. I rebuilt the Fedora 30 pango package (1.43) for Fedora 31, downgraded it, and now my terminals are fine showing my bitmap fonts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 127

[Bug 1660284] New: IndexError: list index out of range
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Apr '21

15 Apr '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1660284 Bug ID: 1660284 Summary: IndexError: list index out of range Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: /usr/bin/fonttools dumps a traceback when calling. $ fonttools Traceback (most recent call last): File "/bin/fonttools", line 11, in <module> load_entry_point('fonttools==3.32.0', 'console_scripts', 'fonttools')() File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/fontTools/__main__.py", line 24, in main mod = 'fontTools.'+sys.argv[1] IndexError: list index out of range That would be better if that can shows more helpful usage or so. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonttools-3.32.0-1.fc30.noarch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1808064] New: Font-Awesome is not updated
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Mar '21

25 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808064 Bug ID: 1808064 Summary: Font-Awesome is not updated Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com Reporter: tjamadeira(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mrunge(a)redhat.com, pvoborni(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The font-awesome it isn't updated. What can be done about this? How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install font awesome via dnf 2. See the version of it. Actual results: Actual version is 4.7 Expected results: Version 5.12 Additional info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543407 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1749943] New: pango contain header with wrong hb.h include
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749943 Bug ID: 1749943 Summary: pango contain header with wrong hb.h include Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: pango Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: vascom2(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I am try to build eiskaltdcpp and it fsilrd with error: BUILDSTDERR: /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pango-coverage.h:28:10: fatal error: hb.h: No such file or directory BUILDSTDERR: 28 | #include <hb.h> BUILDSTDERR: | ^~~~~~ Full build log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5226/37235226/build.log Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.44.6-1.fc32 How reproducible: Always. As I see this line was added in pango 1.44. But harfbuzz's hb.h in Fedora placed at /usr/include/harfbuzz/ Need to solve it for build other packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs April 2020