fonts-bugs May 2020

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
109 discussions

[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 May '20

04 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> --- Hi Petr, Do you mean anything particular in changing the assignation of this issue, or is it a side-effect of the tool you use to add yourself in CC? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1825183] Review Request: hanamin-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 May '20

04 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825183 Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ppisar(a)redhat.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 May '20

04 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ppisar(a)redhat.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1823637] Terminus fonts broken after terminus-fonts-4.48-5.fc32.noarch update
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 May '20

04 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823637 Tomas Popela <tpopela(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(tpopela(a)redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #12 from Tomas Popela <tpopela(a)redhat.com> --- No problems at all Hans. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1823637] Terminus fonts broken after terminus-fonts-4.48-5.fc32.noarch update
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 May '20

03 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823637 Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(tpopela(a)redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #11 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de> --- Tomas, would you mind if I attached your screenshot from https://tpopela.fedorapeople.org/terminus-broken.png to this bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 02 May '20

02 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> --- Right, not font packages build on rawhide right now, because it has emerged rpm 4.15 stealthily changed Source/Patches evaluation rules, making existing templates unsafe. The fix is coded by it is waiting for the common part to be merged in redhat-rpm-config. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/83#commen… Sadly no one wanted to look at the problem seriously rpm or redhat-rpm-config side before I pushed a macro build to koji that showed things were not so simple. *After* breaking rawhide builds people had to look at it and it has emerged it is possible to evade the rpm change consequences by using %sourcelist and %patchlist, and adding a wrapper around Name:/%package to workaround the fact %{name} is "special". You have an example of the new templates and of converted packages in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/workaround-rpm-commit-93604e2-e… I did everything I could to adapt the macro code to rpm changes with as little spec changes as possible. (you can not use those before the common part is merged in redhat-rpm-config) @eclipseo: Go specs will need the same kind of adjustment, because they use the same basic spec structure, I'm waiting to get the fonts part done to be sure there is no problem left before moving to the Go part. @peter So, it will mostly be transparent font spec side, except Sources will move to a new rpm section and you will lose the ability to set the index of a fontconfig file in sources. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 May '20

01 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 --- Comment #5 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> --- SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mavit/hfg-gmuend-openmoj… Updated to follow the new guidelines. It doesn't currently build in rawhide, but I see from Koschei that google-droid-fonts is failing with a similar error, so I think that's probably a rawhide issue. It does build in Fedora 31 and 32. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1823984] Bold fonts in qt applications appear much too heavy
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823984 Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #24 from Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson(a)gmail.com> --- This bug is still present -- I use an X11 session and still see the too-bold Cantarell font issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1823984] Bold fonts in qt applications appear much too heavy
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823984 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2020-05-01 00:36:18 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- FEDORA-2020-d8186e5023 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs May 2020