June 2020 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2020-06-27 13:35:07 --- Comment #9 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> --- Thanks all for your reviews and advice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla <gwync(a)protonmail.com> --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

3 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

RE: invoice

by Sabrina＠fedoraproject.org

3 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1770450] New: Fontconfig warning: "/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/05-reset-dirs-sample.conf", line 6: unknown element "reset-dirs"

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770450 Bug ID: 1770450 Summary: Fontconfig warning: "/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/05-reset-dirs-sample .conf", line 6: unknown element "reset-dirs" Product: Fedora Version: 30 Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: lhaastdaiz(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora When upgrading to fontconfig-2.13.1-9.fc30.x86_64, dnf emits this warning: Fontconfig warning: "/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/05-reset-dirs-sample.conf", line 6: unknown element "reset-dirs" $ cat -n /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/05-reset-dirs-sample.conf 1 <?xml version="1.0"?> 2 <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd"> 3 <fontconfig> 4 <description>Re-define fonts dirs sample</description> 5 6 <reset-dirs /> 7 <dir prefix="xdg">fonts</dir> 8 9 </fontconfig> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 1543407] fontawesome-fonts-5.13.1 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543407 --- Comment #38 from Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> --- The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source declarations if possible. - fontawesome-fonts-fontconfig.conf - README-Trademarks.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1543407] fontawesome-fonts-5.13.1 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543407 Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|fontawesome-fonts-5.13.0 is |fontawesome-fonts-5.13.1 is |available |available --- Comment #37 from Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Latest upstream release: 5.13.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.7.0-8.fc32 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- Package is approved but don't forget to add your changelog entry before import. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0", "SIL Open Font License 1.1", "*No copyright* SIL Open Font License 1.1", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License (v3)", "*No copyright* Public domain", "Expat License". 30462 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/hfg- gmuend-openmoji-fonts/review-hfg-gmuend-openmoji- fonts/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 8 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts-12.3.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts-all-12.3.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts-12.3.0-1.fc33.src.rpm hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Emojis -> Emotes hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US emojis -> emotes hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts-all.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts-all.noarch: W: no-documentation hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Emojis -> Emotes hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US emojis -> emotes hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts.src: E: no-changelogname-tag hfg-gmuend-openmoji-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji/archive/ac1703e9d7feebbf5443a986... <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1847541] New: fonttools-4.12.1 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847541 Bug ID: 1847541 Summary: fonttools-4.12.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 4.12.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.11.0-1.fc33 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1823637] Terminus fonts broken after terminus-fonts-4.48-5.fc32.noarch update

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823637 --- Comment #42 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> --- Okay, upstream merge request is created. URL: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/fonttosfnt/-/merge_requests/8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs June 2020