https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752858
Bug ID: 1752858
Summary: Combinations Reph (र्श्व) not rendering correctly with
Harfbuzz in gedit
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: lohit-devanagari-fonts
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
sshedmak(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1615839
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1615839&action=edit
Image showing rendering issue
Description of problem:
Combination र्श्व is not rendering correctly in gedit/harfbuzz. But it works
properly in Firefox
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-devanagari-fonts 2.95.4-9
harfbuzz-2.6.0-1
How reproducible:
Evertime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open Terminal
2. Type commng: hb-view /usr/share/fonts/lohit-devanagari/Lohit-Devanagari.ttf
र्श्व
3. Observe result
Actual results:
Reph not getting form.
Expected results:
Expected Reph should get formed.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767384
Bug ID: 1767384
Summary: After upgrade to Fedora 31, terminal with
LucidaTypewriter Sans font only shows unicode
rectangles
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: bitmap-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
After upgrading my Fedora 30 XFCE workstation to Fedora 31, my xfce4-terminals
that are configured to use LucidaTypewriter Sans font only rectangles instead
of letters.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bitmap-lucida-typewriter-fonts-0.3-31.fc31.noarch
How reproducible:
Deterministic.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use xfce4-terminal with LucidaTypewriter Sans on Fedora 30.
2. Upgrade to Fedora 31.
Actual results:
Unreadable.
Expected results:
Readable.
Additional info:
On Fedora 31 installation, the LucidaTypewriter Sans font cannot even be
selected in terminal's Preferences > Appearance > Font selection.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750891
Bug ID: 1750891
Summary: font cache not getting update on Silverblue 31?
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I have this system state
[parag@localhost ~]$ rpm-ostree status
State: idle
AutomaticUpdates: disabled
Deployments:
● ostree://fedora:fedora/31/x86_64/silverblue
Version: 31.20190909.n.0 (2019-09-09T08:24:14Z)
BaseCommit:
093a07e18c0514e47e978c9c33ef73a2615117db343e0eef7218c298b1e3502c
GPGSignature: Valid signature by
7D22D5867F2A4236474BF7B850CB390B3C3359C4
LayeredPackages: gedit gnome-tweaks hunspell-hi langpacks-hi
libreoffice-core
ostree://fedora:fedora/31/x86_64/silverblue
Version: 31.20190909.n.0 (2019-09-09T08:24:14Z)
BaseCommit:
093a07e18c0514e47e978c9c33ef73a2615117db343e0eef7218c298b1e3502c
GPGSignature: Valid signature by
7D22D5867F2A4236474BF7B850CB390B3C3359C4
LayeredPackages: gedit gnome-tweaks hunspell-hi libreoffice-core
[parag@localhost ~]$ rpm-ostree db diff
ostree diff commit from: rollback deployment
(0ad271d38c5aa4e1ce194ea625f83862d2c317774d96ba9b94d53c5324133265)
ostree diff commit to: booted deployment
(61f7aea98b458e53e42e85131e62ad7c84f80592676f28949cc5aa411e34ff55)
Added:
glibc-langpack-hi-2.30-1.fc31.x86_64
google-noto-sans-devanagari-ui-vf-fonts-20181223-6.fc31.noarch
google-noto-sans-devanagari-vf-fonts-20181223-6.fc31.noarch
hyphen-hi-1:0.7.0-14.fc31.noarch
langpacks-core-hi-2.0-6.fc31.noarch
langpacks-hi-2.0-6.fc31.noarch
libreoffice-help-hi-1:6.3.1.2-1.fc31.x86_64
libreoffice-langpack-hi-1:6.3.1.2-1.fc31.x86_64
samyak-devanagari-fonts-1.2.2-22.fc31.noarch
samyak-fonts-common-1.2.2-22.fc31.noarch
[parag@localhost ~]$ fc-list :lang=hi
/usr/share/fonts/lohit-devanagari/Lohit-Devanagari.ttf: Lohit
Devanagari:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf: Droid
Sans:style=Regular
[parag@localhost ~]$
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.13.92-2.fc31.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. on F31, install any langpacks which will install additional fonts packages
like langpacks-hi
2. execute fc-list :lang=hi
3.
Actual results:
"fc-list :lang=hi" output remained same
Expected results:
"fc-list :lang=hi" should included rencently installed font packages as well
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015
Cheng-Chia Tseng <pswo10680(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Flags|needinfo?(pswo10680(a)gmail.c |
|om) |
Last Closed| |2020-07-21 03:21:18
--- Comment #26 from Cheng-Chia Tseng <pswo10680(a)gmail.com> ---
The fonts are not actively maintained, there is no new release since my 2015
package.
And, I don't have time to maintain the package further.
Plus, users can still install the fonts manually themselves.
I decide to Close this bug report. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725983
Bug ID: 1725983
Summary: freetype-2.10.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: freetype
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 2.10.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.10.0-2.fc31
URL: https://www.freetype.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/854/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855929
Bug ID: 1855929
Summary: fonttools-4.13.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fonttools
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 4.13.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 4.11.0-1.fc33
URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854225
Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed| |2020-07-11 01:49:20
--- Comment #12 from Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> ---
confirmed fixed for Rawhide in latest compose. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015
Package Review <package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(pswo10680(a)gmail.c
| |om)
--- Comment #25 from Package Review <package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> ---
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.
This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.
You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.
Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.