fonts-bugs October 2021

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
55 discussions

[Bug 1967097] New: Missing OFL in License tag
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Dec '22

13 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967097 Bug ID: 1967097 Summary: Missing OFL in License tag Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: google-droid-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf is licensed under OFLv1.1 but google-droid-sans-fonts which contains this font has ASL 2.0 only in License tag. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-9.fc34 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.otfinfo -i /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf 2.rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License 3. Actual results: $ otfinfo -i /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf Family: Droid Sans Devanagari Subfamily: Regular Full name: Droid Sans Devanagari PostScript name: DroidSansDevanagari Version: Version 1.01 Unique ID: Monotype - Droid Sans Devanagari Description: Droid Sans Devanagari is a low contrast Devanagari typeface intended to harmonize with sans seri f typeface families like Droid Sans. Designer: Jelle Bosma Designer URL: http://www.monotypeimaging.com/ProductsServices/TypeDesignerShowcase Manufacturer: Monotype Imaging Inc. Vendor URL: http://www.monotypeimaging.com Trademark: Droid is a trademark of Google and may be registered in certain jurisdictions. Copyright: Digitized data copyright (c) 2012, Google Corporation. License URL: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL_web License Description: Licensed under the OFL license, version 1.1 Vendor ID: MONO $ rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License License : ASL 2.0 Expected results: License tas should be ASL 2.0 and OFL Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1908952] New: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux Libertine and Biolinum fonts)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Dec '22

12 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908952 Bug ID: 1908952 Summary: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux Libertine and Biolinum fonts) Product: Fedora Version: 33 Status: NEW Component: linux-libertine-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: nekohayo(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi! From the wikipedia page, today I learned that the Linux Libertine (and companion "Biolinum") font has been unmaintained for many years, and that since then the project has been forked and maintained with hundreds of bugfixes and many new releases, under the new name "Libertinus". It can be found here: https://github.com/alerque/libertinus Since it is the same font but improved and with different names, could you please package it for Fedora? I'd really love to use it without needing to manually download it (and remember doing so) regularly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1954716] New: Fonts not used correctly
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Dec '22

08 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716 Bug ID: 1954716 Summary: Fonts not used correctly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: barbarah.duarte(a)fluocomunicacao.com.br QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1776799 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1776799&action=edit LibreOffice with all three fonts displayed in regular, italic and bold face. I have installed some company-provided fonts for use in presentations etc.: $ ls /usr/share/fonts/neo-sans-intel/ NeoSansIntel-Italic.ttf NeoSansIntel-MediumItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-LightItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-Medium.ttf NeoSansIntel-Light.ttf NeoSansIntel.ttf In LibreOffice I have a choice of three separate fonts: Neo Sans Intel, Neo Sans Intel Medium, and Neo Sans Intel Light. For each of those three, the italic version of the font (from the separate TTF file) is used. I can tell by the tail on the 'f' character. For bold text, however, an 'emboldening' algorithm seems to be used instead of using the appropriate separate font file. In GNOME font selection dialogs, I see just one 'Neo Sans Intel' family, with a choice of 8 styles. I'll ignore the italic versions since those do actually seem to work as expected, so there are four weights listed: - Light (== Neo Sans Intel Light) - Regular (== Neo Sans Intel Medium) - Medium (== Neo Sans Intel Medium) - Bold (== Neo Sans Intel Medium + emboldening algorithm?) I *don't* seem to have an option in GNOME which will just use the straight 'Neo Sans Intel' font. So both seem to be getting it wrong, in different ways. Or perhaps there's something wrong with the fonts themselves? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1981500] New: [f34] some snaps are having font display issues
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Dec '22

07 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981500 Bug ID: 1981500 Summary: [f34] some snaps are having font display issues Product: Fedora Version: 34 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: dvd(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Installing some snaps like codium are having font issues in dialog windows. This has been widely discussed upstream [1] Tried multiple workarounds and none of them are working: ~~~ sudo rm /var/cache/fontconfig/* rm ~/.cache/fontconfig/* rm -f ~/snap/codium/current/.cache/ fc-cache -r -v snap run --shell codium fc-cache -r -v exit ~~~ I also tried this with VScodium running Arch wiki [a] suspects it's an issue caused by fontconfig>=2.13.91 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.13.93-6.fc34.x86_64 snapd-selinux-2.51-1.fc34.noarch snap-confine-2.51-1.fc34.x86_64 snapd-2.51-1.fc34.x86_64 How reproducible: All the time Steps to Reproduce: 1. snap install codium 2. Open Folder dialog or any kind of dialog Actual results: All the text is square instead of readable characters Expected results: We should be able to read the text. Additional info: [a] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Talk:Snap [1] ~~~ https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapped-app-not-loading-fonts-on-fedora-and-ar… https://forum.inkdrop.app/t/snap-with-no-visible-letters-in-system-dialogs-… https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Talk:Snap https://githubmemory.com/repo/snapcrafters/codium/issues/6 https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/issues/426 ~~~ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1933539] New: Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not xorg-x11-xkb-utils
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933539 Bug ID: 1933539 Summary: Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not xorg-x11-xkb-utils Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Reporter: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mtasaka(a)tbz.t-com.ne.jp, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Depends On: 1933537 Blocks: 1932731 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora liberation-fonts currently BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils xorg-x11-font-utils is to be split up into multiple packages, see Bug 1932731. This package only requires mkfontscale and mkfontdir, so let's BuildRequires these directly. xorg-x11-font-utils has had Provides for those for ages now anyway, so this is largely a noop from this package's POV. Suggested diff: diff --git a/liberation-fonts.spec b/liberation-fonts.spec index a9cc575..583e224 100644 --- a/liberation-fonts.spec +++ b/liberation-fonts.spec @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ Source8: %{fontname}-sans.metainfo.xml Source9: %{fontname}-serif.metainfo.xml BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13 +BuildRequires: mkfontscale mkfontdir BuildRequires: fontforge BuildRequires: libappstream-glib BuildRequires: python3 Verified successful build in a local F33 container with only the mkfontscale (Bug 1932734) and bdftopcf (Bug 1932736) packages installed, no xorg-x11-font-utils. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932731 [Bug 1932731] X.org Utility Deaggregation - xorg-x11-font-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933537 [Bug 1933537] Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not xorg-x11-xkb-utils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1929377] New: plans for EPEL 8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 Nov '22

28 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929377 Bug ID: 1929377 Summary: plans for EPEL 8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Assignee: nick(a)noodles.net.nz Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mrunge(a)redhat.com, nick(a)noodles.net.nz Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello - Please build this package for EPEL 8. It currently blocks the installation of the unifi-lts package hosted on RPMFusion. I would be glad to do the work if you are willing to give me commit access. My FAS account: kni thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1678974] New: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678974 Bug ID: 1678974 Summary: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: libfontenc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: btissoir(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, btissoir(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.1.4 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1.3-10.fc30 URL: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/lib/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1613/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1858617] New: vlgothic-fonts-20200719 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Oct '22

12 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858617 Bug ID: 1858617 Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20200719 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: vlgothic-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 20200719 Current version/release in rawhide: 20141206-16.fc32 URL: https://osdn.jp/projects/vlgothic/releases/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5103/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1984623] New: sil-lateef-fonts-1.200 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Aug '22

07 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984623 Bug ID: 1984623 Summary: sil-lateef-fonts-1.200 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: sil-lateef-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: hedayatv(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hedayatv(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.200 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.001-20.fc34 URL: https://software.sil.org/lateef/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4819/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1837850] New: Unable to open Noto CJK fonts properly because of no cidmap file
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 Jun '22

26 Jun '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837850 Bug ID: 1837850 Summary: Unable to open Noto CJK fonts properly because of no cidmap file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontforge Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When going to open Noto CJK fonts on fontforge, fontforge opens an error dialog that claims no cidmap file found. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20200314-5.fc32.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.fontforge /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc 2.Select any family names in the list 3. Actual results: Open an error dialog claims: FontForge was unable to find a cidmap file for this font. It is not essential to have one, but some things will work better if you do. if you have not done so you might want to download the cidmaps from: http://FontForge.sourceforge.net/cidmaps.tgz and then gunzip and untar them and move them to: /usr/share/fontforge Expected results: should start loading a font Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs October 2021