[Bug 1967097] New: Missing OFL in License tag
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967097
Bug ID: 1967097
Summary: Missing OFL in License tag
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: google-droid-fonts
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf is licensed under OFLv1.1 but
google-droid-sans-fonts which contains this font has ASL 2.0 only in License
tag.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-9.fc34
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.otfinfo -i
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf
2.rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License
3.
Actual results:
$ otfinfo -i
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf
Family: Droid Sans Devanagari
Subfamily: Regular
Full name: Droid Sans Devanagari
PostScript name: DroidSansDevanagari
Version: Version 1.01
Unique ID: Monotype - Droid Sans Devanagari
Description: Droid Sans Devanagari is a low contrast Devanagari
typeface intended to harmonize with sans seri
f typeface families like Droid Sans.
Designer: Jelle Bosma
Designer URL:
http://www.monotypeimaging.com/ProductsServices/TypeDesignerShowcase
Manufacturer: Monotype Imaging Inc.
Vendor URL: http://www.monotypeimaging.com
Trademark: Droid is a trademark of Google and may be registered in
certain jurisdictions.
Copyright: Digitized data copyright (c) 2012, Google Corporation.
License URL:
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL_web
License Description: Licensed under the OFL license, version 1.1
Vendor ID: MONO
$ rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License
License : ASL 2.0
Expected results:
License tas should be ASL 2.0 and OFL
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 4 months
[Bug 1908952] New: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux
Libertine and Biolinum fonts)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908952
Bug ID: 1908952
Summary: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux
Libertine and Biolinum fonts)
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Status: NEW
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: nekohayo(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi! From the wikipedia page, today I learned that the Linux Libertine (and
companion "Biolinum") font has been unmaintained for many years, and that since
then the project has been forked and maintained with hundreds of bugfixes and
many new releases, under the new name "Libertinus". It can be found here:
https://github.com/alerque/libertinus
Since it is the same font but improved and with different names, could you
please package it for Fedora? I'd really love to use it without needing to
manually download it (and remember doing so) regularly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 4 months
[Bug 1954716] New: Fonts not used correctly
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
Bug ID: 1954716
Summary: Fonts not used correctly
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: barbarah.duarte(a)fluocomunicacao.com.br
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1776799
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1776799&action=edit
LibreOffice with all three fonts displayed in regular, italic and bold face.
I have installed some company-provided fonts for use in presentations etc.:
$ ls /usr/share/fonts/neo-sans-intel/
NeoSansIntel-Italic.ttf NeoSansIntel-MediumItalic.ttf
NeoSansIntel-LightItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-Medium.ttf
NeoSansIntel-Light.ttf NeoSansIntel.ttf
In LibreOffice I have a choice of three separate fonts: Neo Sans Intel, Neo
Sans Intel Medium, and Neo Sans Intel Light.
For each of those three, the italic version of the font (from the separate TTF
file) is used. I can tell by the tail on the 'f' character. For bold text,
however, an 'emboldening' algorithm seems to be used instead of using the
appropriate separate font file.
In GNOME font selection dialogs, I see just one 'Neo Sans Intel' family, with a
choice of 8 styles. I'll ignore the italic versions since those do actually
seem to work as expected, so there are four weights listed:
- Light (== Neo Sans Intel Light)
- Regular (== Neo Sans Intel Medium)
- Medium (== Neo Sans Intel Medium)
- Bold (== Neo Sans Intel Medium + emboldening algorithm?)
I *don't* seem to have an option in GNOME which will just use the straight 'Neo
Sans Intel' font.
So both seem to be getting it wrong, in different ways. Or perhaps there's
something wrong with the fonts themselves?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 4 months
[Bug 1981500] New: [f34] some snaps are having font display issues
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981500
Bug ID: 1981500
Summary: [f34] some snaps are having font display issues
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: dvd(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Installing some snaps like codium are having font issues in dialog windows.
This has been widely discussed upstream [1]
Tried multiple workarounds and none of them are working:
~~~
sudo rm /var/cache/fontconfig/*
rm ~/.cache/fontconfig/*
rm -f ~/snap/codium/current/.cache/
fc-cache -r -v
snap run --shell codium
fc-cache -r -v
exit
~~~
I also tried this with VScodium running
Arch wiki [a] suspects it's an issue caused by fontconfig>=2.13.91
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.13.93-6.fc34.x86_64
snapd-selinux-2.51-1.fc34.noarch
snap-confine-2.51-1.fc34.x86_64
snapd-2.51-1.fc34.x86_64
How reproducible:
All the time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. snap install codium
2. Open Folder dialog or any kind of dialog
Actual results:
All the text is square instead of readable characters
Expected results:
We should be able to read the text.
Additional info:
[a] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Talk:Snap
[1]
~~~
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapped-app-not-loading-fonts-on-fedora-and-...
https://forum.inkdrop.app/t/snap-with-no-visible-letters-in-system-dialog...
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Talk:Snap
https://githubmemory.com/repo/snapcrafters/codium/issues/6
https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/issues/426
~~~
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 4 months
[Bug 1933539] New: Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not
xorg-x11-xkb-utils
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933539
Bug ID: 1933539
Summary: Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not
xorg-x11-xkb-utils
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Reporter: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mtasaka(a)tbz.t-com.ne.jp, petersen(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Depends On: 1933537
Blocks: 1932731
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
liberation-fonts currently BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils
xorg-x11-font-utils is to be split up into multiple packages, see Bug 1932731.
This package only requires mkfontscale and mkfontdir, so let's BuildRequires
these directly. xorg-x11-font-utils has had Provides for those for ages now
anyway, so this is largely a noop from this package's POV.
Suggested diff:
diff --git a/liberation-fonts.spec b/liberation-fonts.spec
index a9cc575..583e224 100644
--- a/liberation-fonts.spec
+++ b/liberation-fonts.spec
@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ Source8: %{fontname}-sans.metainfo.xml
Source9: %{fontname}-serif.metainfo.xml
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils
+BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13
+BuildRequires: mkfontscale mkfontdir
BuildRequires: fontforge
BuildRequires: libappstream-glib
BuildRequires: python3
Verified successful build in a local F33 container with only the mkfontscale
(Bug 1932734) and bdftopcf (Bug 1932736) packages installed, no
xorg-x11-font-utils.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932731
[Bug 1932731] X.org Utility Deaggregation - xorg-x11-font-utils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933537
[Bug 1933537] Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not xorg-x11-xkb-utils
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 4 months
[Bug 1929377] New: plans for EPEL 8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929377
Bug ID: 1929377
Summary: plans for EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: fontawesome-fonts
Assignee: nick(a)noodles.net.nz
Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mrunge(a)redhat.com,
nick(a)noodles.net.nz
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello -
Please build this package for EPEL 8. It currently blocks the installation of
the unifi-lts package hosted on RPMFusion.
I would be glad to do the work if you are willing to give me commit access.
My FAS account: kni
thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 4 months
[Bug 1678974] New: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678974
Bug ID: 1678974
Summary: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: libfontenc
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: btissoir(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, btissoir(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.1.4
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1.3-10.fc30
URL: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/lib/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/1613/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 5 months
[Bug 1837850] New: Unable to open Noto CJK fonts properly because of
no cidmap file
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837850
Bug ID: 1837850
Summary: Unable to open Noto CJK fonts properly because of no
cidmap file
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontforge
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When going to open Noto CJK fonts on fontforge, fontforge opens an error dialog
that claims no cidmap file found.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontforge-20200314-5.fc32.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.fontforge /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc
2.Select any family names in the list
3.
Actual results:
Open an error dialog claims:
FontForge was unable to find a cidmap file for this font.
It is not essential to have one, but some things will work better if you do. if
you have not done so you might want to download the cidmaps from:
http://FontForge.sourceforge.net/cidmaps.tgz
and then gunzip and untar them and move them to:
/usr/share/fontforge
Expected results:
should start loading a font
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 9 months