[Bug 1727602] New: Fedora flatpak for this app on
registry.fedoraproject.org
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727602
Bug ID: 1727602
Summary: Fedora flatpak for this app on
registry.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontforge
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: 7d28c752(a)opayq.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
It would be great if you could provide a flatpak package of this app to
https://registry.fedoraproject.org/.
Especially for users of Fedora Silverblue https://silverblue.fedoraproject.org/
this then allows a seamless installation and upgrades without rebooting the
system (just restarting the application).
Additionally, flatpaks can of course be installed on any distro, so also
non-Fedora users could use it too.
More details:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Flatpaks
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Flatpaks
I know this app is available on Flathub as a flatpak, but I still prefer
Fedora's package testing/QA etc., that's why I'd also like to have a version on
https://registry.fedoraproject.org/. Also Flathub is a third-party source from
the Fedora users/projects viewpoint, so I guess some users would not like to
use third-party app sources.
However, the fact that it is on Flathub should make it easier for you to
implement this, because you can have a look on how they do it. (Not that you
need to do everything in the same way, but it proves it is possible to package
as a flatpak, at least.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 months
[Bug 1813728] New: Square four dot Unicode character has incorrect
glyph
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813728
Bug ID: 1813728
Summary: Square four dot Unicode character has incorrect glyph
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Severity: low
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: guillaumepoiriermorency(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The glyph for the Unicode "square four dot" character is incorrect.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
I think this problem arose when upgrading from Fedora 30 to Fedora 31.
How reproducible:
The simplest way is to start GNOME Characters Map and search for "square four
dot".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 months
[Bug 1833858] New: Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833858
Bug ID: 1833858
Summary: Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: google-droid-fonts
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: hyunwoo.park(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1687129
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1687129&action=edit
wrong display of Hangul at LibreOffice Writer
Description of problem:
When Hangul is output to the monitor, Chosung, Neutral, and Jongseong are
output separately.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Font file, /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf,
of google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-3.fc32.noarch
How reproducible:
If you create a test.html containing "가속도" and open the file in the chrome
browser, the Korean alphabet will be displayed separately.
Or, write "가속도" at LibreOffice Writer and select font as "Droid Sans Fallback".
Steps to Reproduce:
1. write "가속도" at LibreOffece Writer
2. select the text and change font name to "Droid Sans Fallback"
Actual results:
The text is displayed like "가ㅅㅗㄱㄷㅗ".
Expected results:
Text should be "가속도"
Additional info:
https://kldp.org/node/163247
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 months, 1 week
[Bug 1898319] New: dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts: Misleading summary
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898319
Bug ID: 1898319
Summary: dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts: Misleading summary
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: dejavu-fonts
Severity: low
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: van.de.bugger(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
peter(a)thecodergeek.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Summary of dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts is misleading. It is: "A variable-width
Latin-Greek-Cyrillic mono-space font family". Accordingly to Wikipedia:
> A monospaced font, also called a fixed-pitch, fixed-width, or non-proportional font, is a font whose letters and characters each occupy the same amount of horizontal space. This contrasts with variable-width fonts, where the letters and spacings have different widths.
So, a font is either monospaced or variable-width but not both, these are
mutually exclusive concepts. How dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts can be "a
variable-width mono-space font family"??
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts-2.37-15.fc33
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. $ dnf info dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts
Actual results:
Summary : A variable-width Latin-Greek-Cyrillic mono-space font family
Expected results:
Summary : A Latin-Greek-Cyrillic mono-space font family
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 months, 1 week
[Bug 1779123] New: Pango no longer supports type1 fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779123
Bug ID: 1779123
Summary: Pango no longer supports type1 fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mjg(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
In pango 1.44, pango dropped support for type1 fonts. Therefore, no application
which uses pango for font loading can use type1 fonts any more.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.44.6-1.fc31.x86_64 (and later)
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upgrade F31 or rawhide
2. Open any pango-using application
3. Try to use type1 font
Actual results:
No type1 font is usable
Expected results:
Type1 font is usable
Additional info:
bug 1753295 is the same bug for dropped bitmap font support. Over there,
workarounds specific for bitmap fonts (conversion to opentype bitmap fonts) are
discussed. An attempt to discuss type1 there failed.
This bug here is specifically about type1 fonts to discuss ways (or their
absence) to deal with pangos dropped type 1 support.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 months, 1 week
[Bug 1895482] New: Liberation Fonts Support For Serbian locl Glyphs
Incomplete
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895482
Bug ID: 1895482
Summary: Liberation Fonts Support For Serbian locl Glyphs
Incomplete
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Reporter: aleslavista(a)outlook.it
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1727218
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1727218&action=edit
Correctly Localized Glyphs
Description of problem:
Liberation Fonts do NOT provide full support for Serbian localized glyphs.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Liberation-Fonts 2.1-1-1
How reproducible:
You need a program that is able to access the font's localized glyphs: usually
that's LibreOffice Writer.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open LibreOffice Writer
2. Type бгдпт, then бгдпт in Italic, бгдпт in Bold and finally бгдпт in Italic
Bold with Liberation Serif, and do the same with Liberation Sans
3. Set the language to "Serbian Cyrillic"
Actual results:
Not all glyphs are correctly localized
Expected results:
See attachment for correctly localized glyphs
Additional info:
Liberation Mono has slanted Italic, therefore only the first glyph should be
localized: CYRILLIC LETTER SMALL BE.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 months
[Bug 1908952] New: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux
Libertine and Biolinum fonts)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908952
Bug ID: 1908952
Summary: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux
Libertine and Biolinum fonts)
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Status: NEW
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: nekohayo(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi! From the wikipedia page, today I learned that the Linux Libertine (and
companion "Biolinum") font has been unmaintained for many years, and that since
then the project has been forked and maintained with hundreds of bugfixes and
many new releases, under the new name "Libertinus". It can be found here:
https://github.com/alerque/libertinus
Since it is the same font but improved and with different names, could you
please package it for Fedora? I'd really love to use it without needing to
manually download it (and remember doing so) regularly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 months, 3 weeks
[Bug 1761885] New: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761885
Bug ID: 1761885
Summary: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontpackages
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1564432
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
rpm -Va complains a lot about mode of %ghost .uuid files:
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/paktype-naqsh/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/smc-suruma/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-android-emoji/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-crosextra-carlito/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-assamese/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-telugu/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.....
Looks like fontpackages-devel template rpmmacro creates .uuid which %ghost
%atttr(0000)
e.g.
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qlv google-droid-sans-fonts | grep uuid
---------- 1 root root 0 7月 25 23:03
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
ref:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/blob/master/f/fontpackage...
but I guess %transfiletriggerin script by fontconfig creates .uuid as 0755
permission (perhaps)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-25.fc31.noarch
fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.x86_64
fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.i686
google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above, try $ rpm -Va
2.
3.
Actual results:
See above, lots of .uuid permission complaint
Expected results:
No complaint by rpm -Va
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 months, 3 weeks
[Bug 1954716] New: Fonts not used correctly
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
Bug ID: 1954716
Summary: Fonts not used correctly
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: barbarah.duarte(a)fluocomunicacao.com.br
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1776799
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1776799&action=edit
LibreOffice with all three fonts displayed in regular, italic and bold face.
I have installed some company-provided fonts for use in presentations etc.:
$ ls /usr/share/fonts/neo-sans-intel/
NeoSansIntel-Italic.ttf NeoSansIntel-MediumItalic.ttf
NeoSansIntel-LightItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-Medium.ttf
NeoSansIntel-Light.ttf NeoSansIntel.ttf
In LibreOffice I have a choice of three separate fonts: Neo Sans Intel, Neo
Sans Intel Medium, and Neo Sans Intel Light.
For each of those three, the italic version of the font (from the separate TTF
file) is used. I can tell by the tail on the 'f' character. For bold text,
however, an 'emboldening' algorithm seems to be used instead of using the
appropriate separate font file.
In GNOME font selection dialogs, I see just one 'Neo Sans Intel' family, with a
choice of 8 styles. I'll ignore the italic versions since those do actually
seem to work as expected, so there are four weights listed:
- Light (== Neo Sans Intel Light)
- Regular (== Neo Sans Intel Medium)
- Medium (== Neo Sans Intel Medium)
- Bold (== Neo Sans Intel Medium + emboldening algorithm?)
I *don't* seem to have an option in GNOME which will just use the straight 'Neo
Sans Intel' font.
So both seem to be getting it wrong, in different ways. Or perhaps there's
something wrong with the fonts themselves?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 months, 4 weeks