[Bug 1830709] New: Invalid metainfo files
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830709
Bug ID: 1830709
Summary: Invalid metainfo files
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mohd.akram(a)outlook.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Metainfo files provided by the package are deemed invalid by appstream.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
20181223-7.fc32
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. appstreamcli validate
/usr/share/metainfo/google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf.metainfo.xml
Actual results:
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: font-no-font-data
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:4: cid-is-not-rdns google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf
I: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: font-description-missing
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: component-summary-missing
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: component-name-missing
E: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:~: extends-not-allowed
I: google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf:4: cid-contains-hyphen
google-noto-sans-sinhala-vf
Validation failed: errors: 5, infos: 2
Expected results:
Validation was successful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 11 months
[Bug 1952727] New: daewoo-misc are (potentially) proprietary
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952727
Bug ID: 1952727
Summary: daewoo-misc are (potentially) proprietary
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Version: CentOS Stream
Status: ASSIGNED
Component: xorg-x11-fonts
Assignee: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: desktop-qa-list(a)redhat.com
CC: airlied(a)redhat.com, ajax(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jglisse(a)redhat.com, negativo17(a)gmail.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 1952723
Target Milestone: beta
Classification: Red Hat
Pool ID: sst_graphics_infrastructure_rhel_9
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1952723 +++
Description of problem:
The daewoo-misc fonts are potentially proprietary, the only information in
COPYING is:
"Copyright (c) 1987, 1988 Daewoo Electronics Co.,Ltd."
These fonts were first present in X11R5 (1991), see the
fonts/bdf/misc/hanglg16.bdf file and similar. The COPYING file we use now is
from the COPYRIGHT line in the .bdf file, other fonts (e.g. the schumacher
ones) seem to have COMMENT: lines to explain the terms.
I can't find any other information about license terms for this font but given
the age of the copyright notice, I'm not very hopeful either.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xorg-x11-fonts-7.5-30.fc34
Additional info:
Upstream issue filed here:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/font/daewoo-misc/-/issues/1
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952723
[Bug 1952723] daewoo-misc are (potentially) proprietary
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 11 months