fonts-bugs October 2022

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
77 discussions

[Bug 1967097] New: Missing OFL in License tag
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Dec '22

13 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967097 Bug ID: 1967097 Summary: Missing OFL in License tag Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: google-droid-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf is licensed under OFLv1.1 but google-droid-sans-fonts which contains this font has ASL 2.0 only in License tag. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-9.fc34 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.otfinfo -i /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf 2.rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License 3. Actual results: $ otfinfo -i /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf Family: Droid Sans Devanagari Subfamily: Regular Full name: Droid Sans Devanagari PostScript name: DroidSansDevanagari Version: Version 1.01 Unique ID: Monotype - Droid Sans Devanagari Description: Droid Sans Devanagari is a low contrast Devanagari typeface intended to harmonize with sans seri f typeface families like Droid Sans. Designer: Jelle Bosma Designer URL: http://www.monotypeimaging.com/ProductsServices/TypeDesignerShowcase Manufacturer: Monotype Imaging Inc. Vendor URL: http://www.monotypeimaging.com Trademark: Droid is a trademark of Google and may be registered in certain jurisdictions. Copyright: Digitized data copyright (c) 2012, Google Corporation. License URL: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL_web License Description: Licensed under the OFL license, version 1.1 Vendor ID: MONO $ rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License License : ASL 2.0 Expected results: License tas should be ASL 2.0 and OFL Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1908952] New: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux Libertine and Biolinum fonts)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Dec '22

12 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908952 Bug ID: 1908952 Summary: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux Libertine and Biolinum fonts) Product: Fedora Version: 33 Status: NEW Component: linux-libertine-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: nekohayo(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi! From the wikipedia page, today I learned that the Linux Libertine (and companion "Biolinum") font has been unmaintained for many years, and that since then the project has been forked and maintained with hundreds of bugfixes and many new releases, under the new name "Libertinus". It can be found here: https://github.com/alerque/libertinus Since it is the same font but improved and with different names, could you please package it for Fedora? I'd really love to use it without needing to manually download it (and remember doing so) regularly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 2036458] New: Lohit Punjabi font does not implement all unicode specs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Dec '22

11 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036458 Bug ID: 2036458 Summary: Lohit Punjabi font does not implement all unicode specs Product: Fedora Version: 35 Status: NEW Component: Fonts Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: plehal(a)lehal.net QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1848544 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1848544&action=edit unicode spec. Description of problem: Lohit Punjabi Font does not recognize some subjoined consonants which should be recognized per Unicode specs and are recognised by other fonts from other vendors. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): All How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try to type subjoined consonants with characters ਕ,ਗ,ਚ,ਤ,ਥ,ਟ,ਠ,ਦ,ਧ,ਨ 2. It shows as ਪ੍ਕ , ਪ੍ਗ, ਪ੍ਚ......instead of these letters showing properly at the bottom of preceding character. Actual results:ਪ੍ਕ , ਪ੍ਗ, ਪ੍ਚ. Expected results: letters showing properly at the bottom of preceding character. Additional info: Related Unicode document attached. Raavi and Ravi font from Microsoft render it correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036458

1 5

[Bug 2137825] New: fontconfig 2.14.1 breaks hinting
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Dec '22

11 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137825 Bug ID: 2137825 Summary: fontconfig 2.14.1 breaks hinting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: vondruch(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: After update to fontconfig-2.14.1-1.fc38.x86_64, fonts have red/blue shadows. Therefore I guess the font hinting is somehow broken. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -q fontconfig fontconfig-2.14.1-1.fc38.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. This is most obvious in TB email from BZ, where the '|' pipe character has shadows. 2. 3. Actual results: The characters has red/blue shadows Expected results: Characters without shadows Additional info: I have downgraded back to fontconfig-2.14.0-2.fc37.x86_64 for the time being. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137825

1 14

[Bug 1954716] New: Fonts not used correctly
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Dec '22

08 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716 Bug ID: 1954716 Summary: Fonts not used correctly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: barbarah.duarte(a)fluocomunicacao.com.br QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1776799 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1776799&action=edit LibreOffice with all three fonts displayed in regular, italic and bold face. I have installed some company-provided fonts for use in presentations etc.: $ ls /usr/share/fonts/neo-sans-intel/ NeoSansIntel-Italic.ttf NeoSansIntel-MediumItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-LightItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-Medium.ttf NeoSansIntel-Light.ttf NeoSansIntel.ttf In LibreOffice I have a choice of three separate fonts: Neo Sans Intel, Neo Sans Intel Medium, and Neo Sans Intel Light. For each of those three, the italic version of the font (from the separate TTF file) is used. I can tell by the tail on the 'f' character. For bold text, however, an 'emboldening' algorithm seems to be used instead of using the appropriate separate font file. In GNOME font selection dialogs, I see just one 'Neo Sans Intel' family, with a choice of 8 styles. I'll ignore the italic versions since those do actually seem to work as expected, so there are four weights listed: - Light (== Neo Sans Intel Light) - Regular (== Neo Sans Intel Medium) - Medium (== Neo Sans Intel Medium) - Bold (== Neo Sans Intel Medium + emboldening algorithm?) I *don't* seem to have an option in GNOME which will just use the straight 'Neo Sans Intel' font. So both seem to be getting it wrong, in different ways. Or perhaps there's something wrong with the fonts themselves? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 2069725] New: Missing support for Georgian uppercase characters
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Dec '22

07 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069725 Bug ID: 2069725 Summary: Missing support for Georgian uppercase characters Product: Fedora Version: 35 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Fonts Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: alan.g12r(a)outlook.com QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1869049 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1869049&action=edit Fedora 35 Missing Georgian characters Description of problem: Georgian uppercase letters are shown as squares How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.add Georgian keyboard layout 2.open text editor 3.type Georgian letters and make them uppercase Actual results: all characters are shown as replacement boxes Expected results: readable text Additional info: Georgian uppercase characters were introduced in Unicode 11 (2018), but there's no font supporting these glyphs in Fedora. Google Noto fonts include these characters. Noto Georgian fonts are also used as default in Arch-based distributions and Android. Please add Google-Noto-Georgian, that provide full support for Georgian script. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069725

1 11

[Bug 1981500] New: [f34] some snaps are having font display issues
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Dec '22

07 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981500 Bug ID: 1981500 Summary: [f34] some snaps are having font display issues Product: Fedora Version: 34 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: dvd(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Installing some snaps like codium are having font issues in dialog windows. This has been widely discussed upstream [1] Tried multiple workarounds and none of them are working: ~~~ sudo rm /var/cache/fontconfig/* rm ~/.cache/fontconfig/* rm -f ~/snap/codium/current/.cache/ fc-cache -r -v snap run --shell codium fc-cache -r -v exit ~~~ I also tried this with VScodium running Arch wiki [a] suspects it's an issue caused by fontconfig>=2.13.91 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.13.93-6.fc34.x86_64 snapd-selinux-2.51-1.fc34.noarch snap-confine-2.51-1.fc34.x86_64 snapd-2.51-1.fc34.x86_64 How reproducible: All the time Steps to Reproduce: 1. snap install codium 2. Open Folder dialog or any kind of dialog Actual results: All the text is square instead of readable characters Expected results: We should be able to read the text. Additional info: [a] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Talk:Snap [1] ~~~ https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapped-app-not-loading-fonts-on-fedora-and-ar… https://forum.inkdrop.app/t/snap-with-no-visible-letters-in-system-dialogs-… https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Talk:Snap https://githubmemory.com/repo/snapcrafters/codium/issues/6 https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/issues/426 ~~~ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1933539] New: Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not xorg-x11-xkb-utils
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933539 Bug ID: 1933539 Summary: Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not xorg-x11-xkb-utils Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Reporter: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, mtasaka(a)tbz.t-com.ne.jp, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Depends On: 1933537 Blocks: 1932731 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora liberation-fonts currently BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils xorg-x11-font-utils is to be split up into multiple packages, see Bug 1932731. This package only requires mkfontscale and mkfontdir, so let's BuildRequires these directly. xorg-x11-font-utils has had Provides for those for ages now anyway, so this is largely a noop from this package's POV. Suggested diff: diff --git a/liberation-fonts.spec b/liberation-fonts.spec index a9cc575..583e224 100644 --- a/liberation-fonts.spec +++ b/liberation-fonts.spec @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ Source8: %{fontname}-sans.metainfo.xml Source9: %{fontname}-serif.metainfo.xml BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13 +BuildRequires: mkfontscale mkfontdir BuildRequires: fontforge BuildRequires: libappstream-glib BuildRequires: python3 Verified successful build in a local F33 container with only the mkfontscale (Bug 1932734) and bdftopcf (Bug 1932736) packages installed, no xorg-x11-font-utils. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932731 [Bug 1932731] X.org Utility Deaggregation - xorg-x11-font-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933537 [Bug 1933537] Require mkfontdir/mkfontscale directly, not xorg-x11-xkb-utils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 1929377] New: plans for EPEL 8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 Nov '22

28 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929377 Bug ID: 1929377 Summary: plans for EPEL 8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Assignee: nick(a)noodles.net.nz Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mrunge(a)redhat.com, nick(a)noodles.net.nz Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello - Please build this package for EPEL 8. It currently blocks the installation of the unifi-lts package hosted on RPMFusion. I would be glad to do the work if you are willing to give me commit access. My FAS account: kni thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 2059773] New: Please branch and build xorg-x11-font-utils in epel9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Nov '22

16 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059773 Bug ID: 2059773 Summary: Please branch and build xorg-x11-font-utils in epel9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: xorg-x11-font-utils Assignee: ajax(a)redhat.com Reporter: dcavalca(a)fb.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: airlied(a)redhat.com, ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jglisse(a)redhat.com, negativo17(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, xgl-maint(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please branch and build xorg-x11-font-utils in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain xorg-x11-font-utils in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059773

1 8

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs October 2022