fonts-bugs October 2022

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
77 discussions

[Bug 1678974] New: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678974 Bug ID: 1678974 Summary: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: libfontenc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: btissoir(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, btissoir(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.1.4 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1.3-10.fc30 URL: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/lib/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1613/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 2137001] New: fonttools-4.38.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Oct '22

24 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137001 Bug ID: 2137001 Summary: fonttools-4.38.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.38.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.38.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.37.4-1.fc38 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonttools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137001

1 4

[Bug 2120194] Please branch and build vlgothic-fonts in epel9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Oct '22

22 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120194 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |vl-gothic-fonts-20220612-2. | |el9 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2022-10-22 14:54:20 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53dd1b5ba4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120194

1 0

[Bug 2131516] Sinhala letters shake, wobble and momentarily disappear and reappear when typing, sometimes with wrong cursor positions.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Oct '22

19 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131516 --- Comment #10 from Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> --- I tested Peng Wu’s merge request: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango/-/merge_requests/653 This fixes the problem of the double cursor in "අකුරු" input by "wlqrq" "අයුරු" input by "whqrq" I could find no obvious problems when playing with Arabic text in gedit, so I think this will probably not introduce regressions for Arabic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131516

1 0

[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Oct '22

18 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

1 0

[Bug 2131516] Sinhala letters shake, wobble and momentarily disappear and reappear when typing, sometimes with wrong cursor positions.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Oct '22

18 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131516 Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |GNOME Gitlab | |GNOME/pango/-/issues/710 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131516

1 0

[Bug 2120194] Please branch and build vlgothic-fonts in epel9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120194 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53dd1b5ba4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-53dd1b5ba4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120194

1 0

[Bug 2129399] Postscript standard symbol font is not looked up correctly
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129399 --- Comment #27 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> --- That looks like a strong claim. "Symbol" font won't be picked up when someone has the real "Symbol" font installed. in this case, "default" would be better choice instead of "prefer". If DejaVu Sans is better substitute font for Symbol, that should works then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129399

1 0

[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 Bug 1822847 depends on bug 2132574, which changed state. Bug 2132574 Summary: Fedora-review fails to install metapackages with local dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132574 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CANTFIX |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847

1 0

[Bug 2129399] Postscript standard symbol font is not looked up correctly
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Oct '22

14 Oct '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129399 --- Comment #26 from Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #24) > Not exactly. "Symbol" isn't a sort of generic alias family name such as > sans-serif. fontconfig just tries to find out a best font against the > request where may contains "Symbol" in family name. that is almost > equivarent to find out "Cantarell" as a desktop font in GNOME. If not, > trying to pick something up by other conditions then. > > In that sense, that could be said that we are *just* missing a "Symbol" > font. This isn't a sort of bug. > > If we are going to deal with "Symbol" without any special handling, thus, we > just need to add a substitute config to the proper font package which has > enough coverage or metrics compatible for "Symbol". > To be convenient, we could add it into fontconfig but it won't fix any > issues without real fonts. so we should find out any candidate font packages > for that instead of doing something in fontconfig. I was looking at how to achieve this. I couldn't get the "symbol" flag working which I supposed would help here (but would need changes in poppler when creating pattern). Other possibility seems the "prefer" element which works here for me. Do you think that adding something like this to config files of suitable fonts wouldn't break things?: <alias> <family>Symbol</family> <prefer><family>DejaVu Sans</family></prefer> </alias> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129399

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs October 2022