December 2022 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1857488] New: fontawesome-fonts-5.14.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 Bug ID: 1857488 Summary: fontawesome-fonts-5.14.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mrunge(a)redhat.com, pvoborni(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 5.14.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.7.0-8.fc32 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

23 hours, 23 minutes

1
29
0 / 0

[Bug 2123720] New: Noto Sans Thai to default for Thai

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123720 Bug ID: 2123720 Summary: Noto Sans Thai to default for Thai Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: As we have changed most languages default to Noto, it may be good to consider updating Thai to Noto as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123720

1 day, 20 hours

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2123722] New: Noto Khmer to default for Khmer

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123722 Bug ID: 2123722 Summary: Noto Khmer to default for Khmer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: As we have changed most languages default to Noto, it may be good to consider updating Khmer to Noto as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123722

1 day, 20 hours

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: alerque-libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/alerque-libertinus-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 month, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: alerque-libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #22 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #21) > Thanks. Approved. Thanks for the review! https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/50018 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 Benson Muite <benson_muite(a)emailplus.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIGNED |POST --- Comment #21 from Benson Muite <benson_muite(a)emailplus.org> --- Thanks. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #20 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- Updated the spec file: * Removed Conflicts * Use %{?dist} instead of %{dist} * Added %global foundry alerque The %global foundry alerque cased the rpm+srpm to change name to alerque-libertinus-fonts, so I also changed the spec file to reflect this. New URLS: Spec URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/alerque-libertinus-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/alerque-libertinus-fonts-7.040-1.fc36.src.rpm Files in the RPM: /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-alerque-libertinus-fonts.conf /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/AUTHORS.txt /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/CONTRIBUTING.md /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/CONTRIBUTORS.txt /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/FONTLOG.txt /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/README.md /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-alerque-libertinus-fonts.conf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusKeyboard-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusMath-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusMono-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSans-Bold.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSans-Italic.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSans-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-Bold.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-BoldItalic.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-Italic.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-Semibold.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-SemiboldItalic.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerifDisplay-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerifInitials-Regular.otf /usr/share/licenses/alerque-libertinus-fonts /usr/share/licenses/alerque-libertinus-fonts/OFL.txt /usr/share/metainfo/org.fedoraproject.alerque-libertinus-fonts.metainfo.xml Provides: alerque-libertinus-fonts = 7.040-1.fc36 config(alerque-libertinus-fonts) = 7.040-1.fc36 font(libertinuskeyboard) font(libertinusmath) font(libertinusmono) font(libertinussans) font(libertinusserif) font(libertinusserifdisplay) font(libertinusserifinitials) font(libertinusserifsemibold) font(libertinusserifsemibolditalic) metainfo() metainfo(org.fedoraproject.alerque-libertinus-fonts.metainfo.xml) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 Caleb Maclennan <caleb(a)alerque.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(caleb(a)alerque.com | |) | --- Comment #19 from Caleb Maclennan <caleb(a)alerque.com> --- The suggestion from c/15 seems fine to me. ```spec %global foundry alerque ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(caleb(a)alerque.com | |) --- Comment #18 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- Caleb Maclennan: Do you have any preference with foundry for this package? See comment c) on comment 15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #17 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- > Comments: > > a) Ok. Remove conflicts, sorry for that. > > b) > get an error > Issues: > ======= > - Dist tag is present. > > but the spec file seems ok. > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DistTag/ > Any idea why this occurs? Maybe a missing question-mark? I see that I have used %{dist} instead of the correct %{?dist} > c) Using otfinfo - from the package texlive-lcdftypetools , the foundry is > listed as QUE which from > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/vendors/ is alerque > Can you add > %global foundry alerque > to the spec file? > This will also ensure there is no directory conflict as > alerque-libertinus-fonts will be used and will allow symlinking later for > texlive. I think I started with %global foundry alerque, but removed it later since it was optional and the maintainer does not "market" the font under any foundery. The author is maintaining the Arch Linux packages https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/blob/46f02052af3061be069a... and there are no signs of using nothing else than libertinus in the naming and metadata. I could ask upstream if they have any preference? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 month, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs December 2022