December 2022 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1857488] New: fontawesome-fonts-5.14.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 Bug ID: 1857488 Summary: fontawesome-fonts-5.14.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mrunge(a)redhat.com, pvoborni(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 5.14.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.7.0-8.fc32 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 year

1
33
0 / 0

[Bug 1895482] New: Liberation Fonts Support For Serbian locl Glyphs Incomplete

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895482 Bug ID: 1895482 Summary: Liberation Fonts Support For Serbian locl Glyphs Incomplete Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Reporter: aleslavista(a)outlook.it QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1727218 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1727218&action=edit Correctly Localized Glyphs Description of problem: Liberation Fonts do NOT provide full support for Serbian localized glyphs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Liberation-Fonts 2.1-1-1 How reproducible: You need a program that is able to access the font's localized glyphs: usually that's LibreOffice Writer. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open LibreOffice Writer 2. Type бгдпт, then бгдпт in Italic, бгдпт in Bold and finally бгдпт in Italic Bold with Liberation Serif, and do the same with Liberation Sans 3. Set the language to "Serbian Cyrillic" Actual results: Not all glyphs are correctly localized Expected results: See attachment for correctly localized glyphs Additional info: Liberation Mono has slanted Italic, therefore only the first glyph should be localized: CYRILLIC LETTER SMALL BE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 year

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: alerque-libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/alerque-libertinus-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: alerque-libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #22 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #21) > Thanks. Approved. Thanks for the review! https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/50018 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 Benson Muite <benson_muite(a)emailplus.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIGNED |POST --- Comment #21 from Benson Muite <benson_muite(a)emailplus.org> --- Thanks. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #20 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- Updated the spec file: * Removed Conflicts * Use %{?dist} instead of %{dist} * Added %global foundry alerque The %global foundry alerque cased the rpm+srpm to change name to alerque-libertinus-fonts, so I also changed the spec file to reflect this. New URLS: Spec URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/alerque-libertinus-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/alerque-libertinus-fonts-7.040-1.fc36.src.rpm Files in the RPM: /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-alerque-libertinus-fonts.conf /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/AUTHORS.txt /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/CONTRIBUTING.md /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/CONTRIBUTORS.txt /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/FONTLOG.txt /usr/share/doc/alerque-libertinus-fonts/README.md /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-alerque-libertinus-fonts.conf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusKeyboard-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusMath-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusMono-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSans-Bold.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSans-Italic.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSans-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-Bold.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-BoldItalic.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-Italic.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-Semibold.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerif-SemiboldItalic.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerifDisplay-Regular.otf /usr/share/fonts/alerque-libertinus-fonts/LibertinusSerifInitials-Regular.otf /usr/share/licenses/alerque-libertinus-fonts /usr/share/licenses/alerque-libertinus-fonts/OFL.txt /usr/share/metainfo/org.fedoraproject.alerque-libertinus-fonts.metainfo.xml Provides: alerque-libertinus-fonts = 7.040-1.fc36 config(alerque-libertinus-fonts) = 7.040-1.fc36 font(libertinuskeyboard) font(libertinusmath) font(libertinusmono) font(libertinussans) font(libertinusserif) font(libertinusserifdisplay) font(libertinusserifinitials) font(libertinusserifsemibold) font(libertinusserifsemibolditalic) metainfo() metainfo(org.fedoraproject.alerque-libertinus-fonts.metainfo.xml) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 Caleb Maclennan <caleb(a)alerque.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(caleb(a)alerque.com | |) | --- Comment #19 from Caleb Maclennan <caleb(a)alerque.com> --- The suggestion from c/15 seems fine to me. ```spec %global foundry alerque ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(caleb(a)alerque.com | |) --- Comment #18 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- Caleb Maclennan: Do you have any preference with foundry for this package? See comment c) on comment 15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #17 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- > Comments: > > a) Ok. Remove conflicts, sorry for that. > > b) > get an error > Issues: > ======= > - Dist tag is present. > > but the spec file seems ok. > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DistTag/ > Any idea why this occurs? Maybe a missing question-mark? I see that I have used %{dist} instead of the correct %{?dist} > c) Using otfinfo - from the package texlive-lcdftypetools , the foundry is > listed as QUE which from > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/vendors/ is alerque > Can you add > %global foundry alerque > to the spec file? > This will also ensure there is no directory conflict as > alerque-libertinus-fonts will be used and will allow symlinking later for > texlive. I think I started with %global foundry alerque, but removed it later since it was optional and the maintainer does not "market" the font under any foundery. The author is maintaining the Arch Linux packages https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/blob/46f02052af3061be069a... and there are no signs of using nothing else than libertinus in the naming and metadata. I could ask upstream if they have any preference? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 --- Comment #16 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #14) > We want to avoid use of Conflicts here, because these two packages can and > should be simultaneously installed (at least in the texlive use case). Great, I will remove the Conflicts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs December 2022