December 2022 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 Than Ngo <than(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(than(a)redhat.com) | --- Comment #9 from Than Ngo <than(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #7) > Maintainers of texlive and it subpackage texlive-libertinus-fonts; How will > this package affect texlive? Would it be possible to re-use this package > instead of bundling the fonts in texlive-libertinus-fonts? i have checked and believe that it's possible to reuse this package because the texlive-libertinus-fonts are same files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2069483] New: Regular style not included in package

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069483 Bug ID: 2069483 Summary: Regular style not included in package Product: Fedora Version: 35 Status: NEW Component: tlomt-sniglet-fonts Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com Reporter: zhangalexy(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Sniglet has a Regular style and an ExtraBold style, as shown on Google Fonts: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Sniglet. For some reason, the package only contains the ExtraBold style, but it's labelled as the Regular style. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.000-22.fc35 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf repoquery -l tlomt-sniglet-fonts 2. Open the font in Gnome Fonts. Actual results: There is a single .ttf file in the package. Gnome Fonts only show the ExtraBold style, labelled as Regular. Expected results: Both the Regular and the ExtraBold style are included. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069483

1 year, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1967097] New: Missing OFL in License tag

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967097 Bug ID: 1967097 Summary: Missing OFL in License tag Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: google-droid-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf is licensed under OFLv1.1 but google-droid-sans-fonts which contains this font has ASL 2.0 only in License tag. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-9.fc34 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.otfinfo -i /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf 2.rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License 3. Actual results: $ otfinfo -i /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf Family: Droid Sans Devanagari Subfamily: Regular Full name: Droid Sans Devanagari PostScript name: DroidSansDevanagari Version: Version 1.01 Unique ID: Monotype - Droid Sans Devanagari Description: Droid Sans Devanagari is a low contrast Devanagari typeface intended to harmonize with sans seri f typeface families like Droid Sans. Designer: Jelle Bosma Designer URL: http://www.monotypeimaging.com/ProductsServices/TypeDesignerShowcase Manufacturer: Monotype Imaging Inc. Vendor URL: http://www.monotypeimaging.com Trademark: Droid is a trademark of Google and may be registered in certain jurisdictions. Copyright: Digitized data copyright (c) 2012, Google Corporation. License URL: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL_web License Description: Licensed under the OFL license, version 1.1 Vendor ID: MONO $ rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License License : ASL 2.0 Expected results: License tas should be ASL 2.0 and OFL Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 year, 4 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2122022] Review Request: tilman-blumenbach-terminus-mono-fonts - Terminus TTF is a monospace TrueType Font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122022 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122022

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2152347] Review Request: makemusic-finale-fonts - MakeMusic Finale fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, panemade(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1908952] New: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux Libertine and Biolinum fonts)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908952 Bug ID: 1908952 Summary: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux Libertine and Biolinum fonts) Product: Fedora Version: 33 Status: NEW Component: linux-libertine-fonts Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: nekohayo(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi! From the wikipedia page, today I learned that the Linux Libertine (and companion "Biolinum") font has been unmaintained for many years, and that since then the project has been forked and maintained with hundreds of bugfixes and many new releases, under the new name "Libertinus". It can be found here: https://github.com/alerque/libertinus Since it is the same font but improved and with different names, could you please package it for Fedora? I'd really love to use it without needing to manually download it (and remember doing so) regularly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 year, 4 months

1
5
0 / 0

Successful Mail Delivery Report

by Mail Delivery System

This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org. Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s) listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems. The mail system <fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>: delivery via spamassassin: delivered via spamassassin service

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2036458] New: Lohit Punjabi font does not implement all unicode specs

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036458 Bug ID: 2036458 Summary: Lohit Punjabi font does not implement all unicode specs Product: Fedora Version: 35 Status: NEW Component: Fonts Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: plehal(a)lehal.net QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1848544 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1848544&action=edit unicode spec. Description of problem: Lohit Punjabi Font does not recognize some subjoined consonants which should be recognized per Unicode specs and are recognised by other fonts from other vendors. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): All How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try to type subjoined consonants with characters ਕ,ਗ,ਚ,ਤ,ਥ,ਟ,ਠ,ਦ,ਧ,ਨ 2. It shows as ਪ੍ਕ , ਪ੍ਗ, ਪ੍ਚ......instead of these letters showing properly at the bottom of preceding character. Actual results:ਪ੍ਕ , ਪ੍ਗ, ਪ੍ਚ. Expected results: letters showing properly at the bottom of preceding character. Additional info: Related Unicode document attached. Raavi and Ravi font from Microsoft render it correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036458

1 year, 4 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2137825] New: fontconfig 2.14.1 breaks hinting

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137825 Bug ID: 2137825 Summary: fontconfig 2.14.1 breaks hinting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: vondruch(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: After update to fontconfig-2.14.1-1.fc38.x86_64, fonts have red/blue shadows. Therefore I guess the font hinting is somehow broken. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -q fontconfig fontconfig-2.14.1-1.fc38.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. This is most obvious in TB email from BZ, where the '|' pipe character has shadows. 2. 3. Actual results: The characters has red/blue shadows Expected results: Characters without shadows Additional info: I have downgraded back to fontconfig-2.14.0-2.fc37.x86_64 for the time being. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137825

1 year, 4 months

1
14
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs December 2022