February 2022 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #13 from Dr Anirban Mitra <mitra_anirban(a)yahoo.co.in> --- Made changes as suggested SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-f... SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-f... Fedora Review done at copr: 'fedora-review', '--no-colors', '--prebuilt', '--rpm-spec', '--name', 'uniol-fonts', '--mock-config', '/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg'] cwd: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results rc: 1 stdout: stderr: INFO: Processing local files: uniol-fonts INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results INFO: --> SRPM url: file:///var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.src.rpm INFO: Using review directory: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/uniol-fonts WARNING: No disttag found in prebuilt packages INFO: Use --define DISTTAG to set proper dist. e. g. --define DISTTAG fc21. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- 1) You don't need below lines BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem These packages does not exists now in Fedora and replaced by fonts-rpm-macros package. 2) You should add one space between "*" and "Sun" in Changelog entries. 3) Also, try to give correct URLs of SPEC and SRPM without error so that I can run fedora-review on this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #11 from Dr Anirban Mitra <mitra_anirban(a)yahoo.co.in> --- https://dSPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-f... SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-f... $ rpmlint uniol-fonts.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.src.rpm uniol-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ol -> O, L, Ola uniol-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ued -> ed, used, sued uniol-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US variouss -> various, various s, vagarious Error checking signature of uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.src.rpm: uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.src.rpm: digests SIGNATURES NOT OK rpmlint uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.noarch.rpm uniol-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ol -> O, L, Ola uniol-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ued -> ed, used, sued uniol-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US variouss -> various, various s, vagarious Error checking signature of uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.noarch.rpm: uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.noarch.rpm: digests SIGNATURES NOT OK 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #10 from Dr Anirban Mitra <mitra_anirban(a)yahoo.co.in> --- SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-f... SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/uniol-f... $ rpmlint uniol-fonts.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.src.rpm uniol-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ol -> O, L, Ola uniol-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ued -> ed, used, sued uniol-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US variouss -> various, various s, vagarious Error checking signature of uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.src.rpm: uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.src.rpm: digests SIGNATURES NOT OK rpmlint uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.noarch.rpm uniol-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ol -> O, L, Ola uniol-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ued -> ed, used, sued uniol-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US variouss -> various, various s, vagarious Error checking signature of uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.noarch.rpm: uniol-fonts-1.0.1-5.fc35.noarch.rpm: digests SIGNATURES NOT OK 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2048456] Review Request: fbf-mukti-fonts - Bangla open source Opentype font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2048456] Review Request: fbf-mukti-fonts - Bangla open source Opentype font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456 --- Comment #21 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- 5) and yes you don't need Source1: you already have generate.pe packaged in tarball. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2048456] Review Request: fbf-mukti-fonts - Bangla open source Opentype font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456 --- Comment #20 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- If upstream follows correct way of development, tagging and release then forge macros are also very much simpler. 1) The way we write tag is just tagged value not complete "refs/tags/v3.0.2". But this is optional as you are using commit hash way to fetch upstream tarball from github. 2) You need to write Source0 as Source0: https://github.com/mitradranirban/fonts-mukti/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%... 3) It appears as suggested in my previous comment, you have not fixed license tag. Use %global fontlicense GPLv3+ with exceptions 4) Also when you write SPEC file, Good to use empty characters are space character not tabs to separate two consecutive words. Currently it seems you got fbf-mukti-fonts.spec:20: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 20) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> --- 1) You need to use either one as suggested in packaging guidelines. Either commit or tag. If you want to use commit, then gittag line becomes optional. 2) If we use the commit approach then let's check if Source0: is downloadable. wget https://github.com/mitradranirban/font-uniol/fd2431cc7661f68e52d2b32598d7... --2022-02-06 05:53:27-- https://github.com/mitradranirban/font-uniol/fd2431cc7661f68e52d2b32598d7... Resolving github.com (github.com)... 13.234.176.102 Connecting to github.com (github.com)|13.234.176.102|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2022-02-06 05:53:28 ERROR 404: Not Found. This mean you have not followed the way github Source used to get downloaded as defined in that guidelines page. Use Source0: https://github.com/mitradranirban/font-uniol/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{... 3) After you do above fixes, I am able to build this package now. Next we need to check rpmlint on generated srpm and rpms [~/rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/uniol-fonts-1.0.1-3.fc35.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/uniol-fonts-1.0.1-3.fc35.noarch.rpm uniol-fonts.spec: E: specfile-error error: %changelog entries must start with * uniol-fonts.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag uniol-fonts.src: E: no-changelogname-tag uniol-fonts.spec:49: W: macro-in-%changelog %forgemeta uniol-fonts.spec:49: W: macro-in-%changelog %forgesource uniol-fonts.spec:62: W: macro-in-%changelog %forgemacro For every macro you write in any Changelog entry you need to add one more % character, hence your %forgemeta becomes %%forgemeta This will prevent to expand that macros in changelog entry when package is built. You forgot to start each changelog entry with "*" character. Also, After you fixed upstream, I can now successfully used forge macros to create this package. But as you find alternate method useful, you can keep it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2048456] Review Request: fbf-mukti-fonts - Bangla open source Opentype font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456 --- Comment #19 from Dr Anirban Mitra <mitra_anirban(a)yahoo.co.in> --- I removed forgemeta macro and did is alternate way by referencing to upstream and it built well in copr SPEC FILE : https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/fonts-m... SRPM FILE : https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mitradranirban/fonts-m... I feel this way this is much easier after I update the upstream. I just have to change the commit hash, gittag and version and rest is automatic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2050295] Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295 --- Comment #8 from Dr Anirban Mitra <mitra_anirban(a)yahoo.co.in> --- Corrected SPEC as suggested https://github.com/mitradranirban/uniol-fonts/raw/main/SPECS/uniol-fonts.... Also added generate.pe and fontconfig to upstream source and bumped its version and tag to 1.0.1 Still build failed in copr http://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mitradranirban/uniol-fonts/build/3... May be I should try the alternate method of https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_usi... instead of forgesource -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295

2 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs February 2022