April 2022 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2077991] CVE-2022-27405 FreeType: Segementation Fault

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

2 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2077989] CVE-2022-27404 FreeType: Buffer Overflow

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

2 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2077985] CVE-2022-27406 Freetype: Segmentation violation

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

2 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2075095] New: Please branch and build dustin-domestic-manners-fonts in epel9

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075095 Bug ID: 2075095 Summary: Please branch and build dustin-domestic-manners-fonts in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts Assignee: sven(a)lank.es Reporter: tdawson(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sven(a)lank.es, tdawson(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please branch and build dustin-domestic-manners-fonts in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain dustin-domestic-manners-fonts in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package. (FES: tdawson) Please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/adduser I have tested and the rawhide package builds in EPEL9 without any changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075095

2 years

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2021366] New: Nimbus Mono PS font should not fc-match Courier, as certain letter combinations are not monospaced

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021366 Bug ID: 2021366 Summary: Nimbus Mono PS font should not fc-match Courier, as certain letter combinations are not monospaced Product: Fedora Version: 35 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Fonts Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: info(a)skierpage.com QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1840789 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1840789&action=edit look at "affiliation" Description of problem: I visited https://schema.org/Person in Firefox in Fedora 35 KDE spin and noticed the monospace text "affiliation" was not monospaced; the letters "ffi" were on top of each other as if replaced by the ligature ﬃ. The page CSS is styling the <code> tag "font-family: Courier, monospace;", and in Fedora 35 KDE Spin `fc-match Courier` returns NimbusMonoPS-Regular.otf: "Nimbus Mono PS" "Regular" indeed, if I set font-family to "Nimbus Mono PS" in some simple HTML https://www.skierpage.com/bugs/nimbusmono_not_monospaced.html , other ff combinations are also "ligature-ized". I tried these two URLs in the chromium-browser package and in the Epiphany and Konqueror browser flatpaks. These did not use "Nimbus Mono PS" as the fallback font for font-family "Courier" so did not display "affiliation" badly on the Person web page, but if you specify font-family "Nimbus Mono PS", you get the ligature. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Mozilla Firefox 94.0 urw-base35-fonts-20200910-9.fc35.src.rpm How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit https://schema.org/Person and https://www.skierpage.com/bugs/nimbusmono_not_monospaced.html in Firefox and other browsers. 2. Note how "ffi" appears. Actual results: Firefox uses "Nimbus Mono PS" as the fallback for font-family Courier; all these browsers replace "ffi" and such with the ligature character in "Nimbus Mono PS", destroying the desired monospace effect. Expected results: Monospaced fonts should appear... monospaced, so every character should occupy the same amount of horizontal space. However, if a font provides ligature glyphs for "ffi" and such, then it's unclear if it's wrong for the browser to use them; (l33t developers now explicitly use monospaced coding fonts that do wacky substitutions.) So the fix could be for Firefox and/or fc-match to _not_ use Nimbus Mono PS when text handling requests Courier. The other browsers on my system don't, I'm not sure why. Another could be to remove the ligatures from Nimbus Mono PS. Additional info: The rendering of code on that page (see attachment) is pretty terrible, note the oversized 'd's in "address". Another reason to have Courier match some other monospaced font than Nimbus Mono PS. You can use the Fontmatrix program to enable OpenType features; checking latn > dflt > liga changes the display of "ff" combinations. Firefox using ligatures in monospaced fonts is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384395 , was closed WONTFIX "We can't really do anything about it -- the underlying text system is doing the ligaturization, not us". ArchLinux users discussed the problem in https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=238832 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021366

2 years

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2073543] New: fonttools-4.32.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073543 Bug ID: 2073543 Summary: fonttools-4.32.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 4.32.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.31.2-1.fc37 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073543

2 years

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 1909251] New: stix-fonts-2.10 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909251 Bug ID: 1909251 Summary: stix-fonts-2.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: stix-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.10 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.0.2-8.fc34 URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/stixfonts Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4893/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 years, 1 month

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 1641503] sil-andika-fonts-6.101 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641503 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |sil-andika-fonts-6.101-1.fc | |37 Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Last Closed| |2022-04-07 10:07:41 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- FEDORA-2022-b0e6b9764d has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641503

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1641503] sil-andika-fonts-6.101 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641503 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- FEDORA-2022-b0e6b9764d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b0e6b9764d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641503

2 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2045012] New: Split the Cantarell fonts into 2 for VF and non-variable fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045012 Bug ID: 2045012 Summary: Split the Cantarell fonts into 2 for VF and non-variable fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: abattis-cantarell-fonts Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cosimo.cecchi(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, me(a)fale.io, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Matthias Clasen pointed out that abattis-cantarell-fonts currently includes both variable and non-variable fonts. This duplication makes it harder for pango to choose the right font for example. We should split the binary package into two and only install the VF one by default. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.301-6 Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -ql abattis-cantarell-fonts Actual results: Contains both fixed and variable fonts Expected results: Probably Cantarell-VF.otf should be moved to abattis-cantarell-vf-fonts subpackage and made the default. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045012

2 years, 1 month

1
8
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs April 2022