[Bug 2123720] New: Noto Sans Thai to default for Thai
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123720
Bug ID: 2123720
Summary: Noto Sans Thai to default for Thai
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
As we have changed most languages default to Noto, it may be good to consider
updating Thai to Noto as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123720
1 month
[Bug 2123722] New: Noto Khmer to default for Khmer
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123722
Bug ID: 2123722
Summary: Noto Khmer to default for Khmer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
As we have changed most languages default to Noto, it may be good to consider
updating Khmer to Noto as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123722
1 month
[Bug 2063714] New: serif:lang=ja falls back to Droid Sans instead of
Noto Sans CJK JP
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063714
Bug ID: 2063714
Summary: serif:lang=ja falls back to Droid Sans instead of Noto
Sans CJK JP
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
In Fedora 36 when google-noto-serif-cjk-ttc-fonts is not installed
fontconfig seems to fall back to google-droid-sans-fonts
rather than google-noto-sans-cjk-ttc-fonts.
This might be related to/caused by bug 517789?
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. boot Fedora Live image
2. fc-match serif:lang=ja
Actual results:
2. DroidSansJapanese.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular"
Expected results:
2. NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc: "Noto Sans CJK JP" "Regular"
Additional info:
I get the same result with your older copr repo applied F35 fwiw.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063714
3 months, 1 week
[Bug 2069483] New: Regular style not included in package
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069483
Bug ID: 2069483
Summary: Regular style not included in package
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
Component: tlomt-sniglet-fonts
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: zhangalexy(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Sniglet has a Regular style and an ExtraBold style, as shown on Google Fonts:
https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Sniglet. For some reason, the package only
contains the ExtraBold style, but it's labelled as the Regular style.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.000-22.fc35
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf repoquery -l tlomt-sniglet-fonts
2. Open the font in Gnome Fonts.
Actual results:
There is a single .ttf file in the package.
Gnome Fonts only show the ExtraBold style, labelled as Regular.
Expected results:
Both the Regular and the ExtraBold style are included.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069483
3 months, 2 weeks
[Bug 1967097] New: Missing OFL in License tag
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967097
Bug ID: 1967097
Summary: Missing OFL in License tag
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: google-droid-fonts
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf is licensed under OFLv1.1 but
google-droid-sans-fonts which contains this font has ASL 2.0 only in License
tag.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-9.fc34
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.otfinfo -i
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf
2.rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License
3.
Actual results:
$ otfinfo -i
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf
Family: Droid Sans Devanagari
Subfamily: Regular
Full name: Droid Sans Devanagari
PostScript name: DroidSansDevanagari
Version: Version 1.01
Unique ID: Monotype - Droid Sans Devanagari
Description: Droid Sans Devanagari is a low contrast Devanagari
typeface intended to harmonize with sans seri
f typeface families like Droid Sans.
Designer: Jelle Bosma
Designer URL:
http://www.monotypeimaging.com/ProductsServices/TypeDesignerShowcase
Manufacturer: Monotype Imaging Inc.
Vendor URL: http://www.monotypeimaging.com
Trademark: Droid is a trademark of Google and may be registered in
certain jurisdictions.
Copyright: Digitized data copyright (c) 2012, Google Corporation.
License URL:
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL_web
License Description: Licensed under the OFL license, version 1.1
Vendor ID: MONO
$ rpm -qi google-droid-sans-fonts | grep License
License : ASL 2.0
Expected results:
License tas should be ASL 2.0 and OFL
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 months, 2 weeks
[Bug 1908952] New: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux
Libertine and Biolinum fonts)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908952
Bug ID: 1908952
Summary: Please package Libertinus (successor to Linux
Libertine and Biolinum fonts)
Product: Fedora
Version: 33
Status: NEW
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: nekohayo(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi! From the wikipedia page, today I learned that the Linux Libertine (and
companion "Biolinum") font has been unmaintained for many years, and that since
then the project has been forked and maintained with hundreds of bugfixes and
many new releases, under the new name "Libertinus". It can be found here:
https://github.com/alerque/libertinus
Since it is the same font but improved and with different names, could you
please package it for Fedora? I'd really love to use it without needing to
manually download it (and remember doing so) regularly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 months, 2 weeks
[Bug 2093080] New: Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font
packages list
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Bug ID: 2093080
Summary: Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font
packages list
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: awilliam(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
There's a test case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_i18n_default_fonts
which requires checking the default fonts for various languages against a list,
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/fc-test.sh .
The current default fonts for Arabic installs do not match the list. The list
states sans should be DejaVu Sans, serif should be FreeSerif or MPH 2B Damase,
and mono should be DejaVu Sans Mono. These may have been changed recently, as
our openQA reference text file expects them to be Noto Naskh Arabic (for both
sans and serif?) and PakType Naskh Basic for mono.
In any case, what we actually see doesn't match either the list or the openQA
reference file. We see "Noto Sans Arabic" and "PakType Naqsh" in the output
from the test, I think for serif (yes really) and monospace respectively.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
3 months, 3 weeks
[Bug 1761885] New: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761885
Bug ID: 1761885
Summary: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontpackages
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1564432
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
rpm -Va complains a lot about mode of %ghost .uuid files:
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/paktype-naqsh/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/smc-suruma/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-android-emoji/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-crosextra-carlito/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-assamese/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-telugu/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.....
Looks like fontpackages-devel template rpmmacro creates .uuid which %ghost
%atttr(0000)
e.g.
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qlv google-droid-sans-fonts | grep uuid
---------- 1 root root 0 7月 25 23:03
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
ref:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/blob/master/f/fontpackage...
but I guess %transfiletriggerin script by fontconfig creates .uuid as 0755
permission (perhaps)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-25.fc31.noarch
fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.x86_64
fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.i686
google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above, try $ rpm -Va
2.
3.
Actual results:
See above, lots of .uuid permission complaint
Expected results:
No complaint by rpm -Va
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 months, 3 weeks
[Bug 2036458] New: Lohit Punjabi font does not implement all unicode
specs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036458
Bug ID: 2036458
Summary: Lohit Punjabi font does not implement all unicode
specs
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
Component: Fonts
Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: plehal(a)lehal.net
QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1848544
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1848544&action=edit
unicode spec.
Description of problem:
Lohit Punjabi Font does not recognize some subjoined consonants which should be
recognized per Unicode specs and are recognised by other fonts from other
vendors.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
All
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to type subjoined consonants with characters ਕ,ਗ,ਚ,ਤ,ਥ,ਟ,ਠ,ਦ,ਧ,ਨ
2. It shows as ਪ੍ਕ , ਪ੍ਗ, ਪ੍ਚ......instead of these letters showing properly at
the bottom of preceding character.
Actual results:ਪ੍ਕ , ਪ੍ਗ, ਪ੍ਚ.
Expected results: letters showing properly at the bottom of preceding
character.
Additional info: Related Unicode document attached. Raavi and Ravi font from
Microsoft render it correctly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036458
3 months, 3 weeks