[Bug 2184872] New: User installed Japanese fonts override system
fonts when substituting glyphs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184872
Bug ID: 2184872
Summary: User installed Japanese fonts override system fonts
when substituting glyphs
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bztdlinux(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When installing a Japanese font locally (using gnome font viewer, which
effectively copies to ~/.local/share/fonts/), with the default fontconfig, all
kana in the system uses that font.
However, it only affects certain applications. Firefox (rpm) and Inkscape
(flatpak) is affected, but gwrite is not.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.14.0-3.fc37.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download the following font:
http://font.sumomo.ne.jp/fontdata-c2157415/k-font.zip
2. Unzip and install by double-clicking the font in nautilus and clicking
install.
3. Restart Firefox or Inkscape and paste "です” in a field with sans-serif or
system-ui font
Actual results:
Text appears with the new font
Expected results:
Text appears with the normal system font
Additional info:
Running pango-view, e.g. the following, works fine and selects a reasonable
font (Droid Sans Japanese):
FC_DEBUG=4 pango-view --font="system-ui" -t です | grep family
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184872
2 days, 7 hours
[Bug 2112732] New: Fail to build from source
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732
Bug ID: 2112732
Summary: Fail to build from source
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: campivisivi-titillium-fonts
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip contains two directory. one is
Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT which is specified as a base directory in
the spec file. another one is __MACOSX. the spec file doesn't clean up
__MACOSX, thus, the build stop on extracting like:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x
/var/home/tagoh/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip
replace __MACOSX/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT/._Titillium-Black.otf?
[y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.download SRPM
2.rpmbuild --rebuild campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37.src.rpm
3.try again once the rebuild finished.
Actual results:
the rebuild always fails except first try.
Expected results:
the rebuild should be successfully finished any time.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732
3 days, 19 hours
[Bug 2188151] New: Update packages to their latest version
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188151
Bug ID: 2188151
Summary: Update packages to their latest version
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: sil-charis-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com
Reporter: zolikydev(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/112.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Build Identifier:
Hello,
I was wondering if you could update the packages "sil-charis-fonts" and
"sil-charis-compact-fonts" to their latest versions? The current ones seem to
be quite outdated.
The newest Charis SIL font is available here:
https://software.sil.org/charis
and the compact version is here: https://software.sil.org/lcgfonts/download
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188151
6 days, 6 hours
[Bug 1833858] New: Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833858
Bug ID: 1833858
Summary: Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: google-droid-fonts
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: hyunwoo.park(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1687129
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1687129&action=edit
wrong display of Hangul at LibreOffice Writer
Description of problem:
When Hangul is output to the monitor, Chosung, Neutral, and Jongseong are
output separately.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Font file, /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf,
of google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-3.fc32.noarch
How reproducible:
If you create a test.html containing "가속도" and open the file in the chrome
browser, the Korean alphabet will be displayed separately.
Or, write "가속도" at LibreOffice Writer and select font as "Droid Sans Fallback".
Steps to Reproduce:
1. write "가속도" at LibreOffece Writer
2. select the text and change font name to "Droid Sans Fallback"
Actual results:
The text is displayed like "가ㅅㅗㄱㄷㅗ".
Expected results:
Text should be "가속도"
Additional info:
https://kldp.org/node/163247
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 week, 1 day
[Bug 1999078] New: Hinting broken for Bitstream Vera/DejaVu in
Epiphany
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999078
Bug ID: 1999078
Summary: Hinting broken for Bitstream Vera/DejaVu in Epiphany
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: freetype
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ossman(a)cendio.se
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mark(a)net-c.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1819062
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819062&action=edit
Screenshot with varying sub pixel placement
Description of problem:
After upgrading from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34, there is some extremely odd
hinting bug in Epiphany. The same glyph appears with different amount of
hinting in the same line of text, causing a very odd and blurry appearance.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.10.4-3.fc34.x86_64
bitstream-vera-sans-fonts-1.10-41.fc33.noarch
dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-16.fc34.noarch
epiphany-40.3-1.fc34.x86_64
webkit2gtk3-2.32.3-1.fc34.x86_64
pango-1.48.9-2.fc34.x86_64
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure Epiphany to use Bitstream Vera or DejaVu Sans Book
2. Configure full hinting
Actual results:
Fully hinted, consistent glyphs.
Expected results:
Some glyphs are fully hinted, some look like they've been offset by a fraction
of a pixel. (See screenshot)
Additional info:
So far I'm only seeing this in Epiphany. I still filed this for freetype since
as far as I know it is freetype that does all glyph layout, hinting and
sub-pixel stuff. Feel free to move as appropriate. So it seems odd that a bug
in Epiphany can screw this up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 week, 3 days
[Bug 2088665] New: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters
it doesn't contain
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665
Bug ID: 2088665
Summary: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it
doesn't contain
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: talk(a)danielflaum.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1881507
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1881507&action=edit
A zipped sample PDF and image of relevant portion of PDF when affected by the
issue
Description of problem:
Given a PDF lacking embedded fonts which use certain characters (including →
and ≥), GNOME's Evince on Fedora 36 chooses to substitute the Noto Sans font,
which does not include these characters.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Successfully reproduced by two people independently.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot a fresh copy of Fedora 36 (the Live version in a VM will do).
2. Open the attached sample PDF in GNOME Evince (aka Document Viewer).
3. Observe the missing characters in the second paragraph from the top of the
page.
Actual results:
See attached image.
Expected results:
The missing characters should be displayed properly as → (that is,
https://unicode-table.com/en/2192/).
Additional info:
The filer initially sought help at
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/missing-characters-in-pdfs-since-upgrade-...,
which may be informative in reproducing the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665
1 week, 4 days
[Bug 2247028] New: fonttools fails to build with Python 3.13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_PyLong_Copy’
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247028
Bug ID: 2247028
Summary: fonttools fails to build with Python 3.13: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘_PyLong_Copy’
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fonttools
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ksurma(a)redhat.com,
mhroncok(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2244836 (PYTHON3.13)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
fonttools fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1.
This report is automated and not very verbose, but we'll try to get back here
with details.
Lib/fontTools/qu2cu/qu2cu.c: In function ‘__Pyx_PyLong_AbsNeg’:
Lib/fontTools/qu2cu/qu2cu.c:10421:26: error: implicit declaration of function
‘_PyLong_Copy’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
10421 | PyObject *copy = _PyLong_Copy((PyLongObject*)n);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html
For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora...
For all our attempts to build fonttools with Python 3.13, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/fontt...
Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr.
You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package
builds with Python 3.13:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/
Let us know here if you have any questions.
Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41.
To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all
pre-releases of Python 3.13.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive
[Build]Requires),
so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed
soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best,
but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work
around it on our side.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836
[Bug 2244836] Python 3.13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247028
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...
1 month
Successful Mail Delivery Report
by Mail Delivery System
This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org.
Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s)
listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will
receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive
notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems.
The mail system
<fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>: delivery via spamassassin: delivered via
spamassassin service
1 month
