[Bug 2088665] New: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters
it doesn't contain
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665
Bug ID: 2088665
Summary: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it
doesn't contain
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: talk(a)danielflaum.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1881507
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1881507&action=edit
A zipped sample PDF and image of relevant portion of PDF when affected by the
issue
Description of problem:
Given a PDF lacking embedded fonts which use certain characters (including →
and ≥), GNOME's Evince on Fedora 36 chooses to substitute the Noto Sans font,
which does not include these characters.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Successfully reproduced by two people independently.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot a fresh copy of Fedora 36 (the Live version in a VM will do).
2. Open the attached sample PDF in GNOME Evince (aka Document Viewer).
3. Observe the missing characters in the second paragraph from the top of the
page.
Actual results:
See attached image.
Expected results:
The missing characters should be displayed properly as → (that is,
https://unicode-table.com/en/2192/).
Additional info:
The filer initially sought help at
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/missing-characters-in-pdfs-since-upgrade-...,
which may be informative in reproducing the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665
1 month
[Bug 2093080] New: Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font
packages list
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
Bug ID: 2093080
Summary: Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font
packages list
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: awilliam(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
There's a test case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_i18n_default_fonts
which requires checking the default fonts for various languages against a list,
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/fc-test.sh .
The current default fonts for Arabic installs do not match the list. The list
states sans should be DejaVu Sans, serif should be FreeSerif or MPH 2B Damase,
and mono should be DejaVu Sans Mono. These may have been changed recently, as
our openQA reference text file expects them to be Noto Naskh Arabic (for both
sans and serif?) and PakType Naskh Basic for mono.
In any case, what we actually see doesn't match either the list or the openQA
reference file. We see "Noto Sans Arabic" and "PakType Naqsh" in the output
from the test, I think for serif (yes really) and monospace respectively.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080
1 month
[Bug 1761885] New: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761885
Bug ID: 1761885
Summary: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontpackages
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1564432
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
rpm -Va complains a lot about mode of %ghost .uuid files:
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/paktype-naqsh/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/smc-suruma/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-android-emoji/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-crosextra-carlito/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-assamese/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-telugu/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.....
Looks like fontpackages-devel template rpmmacro creates .uuid which %ghost
%atttr(0000)
e.g.
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qlv google-droid-sans-fonts | grep uuid
---------- 1 root root 0 7月 25 23:03
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
ref:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/blob/master/f/fontpackage...
but I guess %transfiletriggerin script by fontconfig creates .uuid as 0755
permission (perhaps)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-25.fc31.noarch
fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.x86_64
fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.i686
google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above, try $ rpm -Va
2.
3.
Actual results:
See above, lots of .uuid permission complaint
Expected results:
No complaint by rpm -Va
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 month, 3 weeks
[Bug 2112732] New: Fail to build from source
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732
Bug ID: 2112732
Summary: Fail to build from source
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: campivisivi-titillium-fonts
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip contains two directory. one is
Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT which is specified as a base directory in
the spec file. another one is __MACOSX. the spec file doesn't clean up
__MACOSX, thus, the build stop on extracting like:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x
/var/home/tagoh/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip
replace __MACOSX/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT/._Titillium-Black.otf?
[y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.download SRPM
2.rpmbuild --rebuild campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37.src.rpm
3.try again once the rebuild finished.
Actual results:
the rebuild always fails except first try.
Expected results:
the rebuild should be successfully finished any time.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732
1 month, 4 weeks
[Bug 1999864] New: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although
such a package exists for Fedora 34
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Bug ID: 1999864
Summary: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such
a package exists for Fedora 34
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1819530
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819530&action=edit
Gnome Software unable to find Coptic fonts
Using Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso in qemu.
I played with emoji picker and Gnome popped up something requesting more fonts.
I clicked and then Gnome Software said:
“Unable to find the Coptic, Persian, Old (ca. 600-400 B.C.), Ugaritic you were
searching for. Please see _the documentation_ for more information.”
See attached screenshot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 months, 1 week
[Bug 2096153] New: strange font priorities in Firefox
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096153
Bug ID: 2096153
Summary: strange font priorities in Firefox
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: google-droid-fonts
Assignee: ali.erdinc.koroglu(a)intel.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ali.erdinc.koroglu(a)intel.com, contact(a)dannycolin.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com,
skyfaller(a)gmail.com
Depends On: 2062386
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Cloning to focus on the Droid specific issue here. please ignore URW related
description.
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2062386 +++
Description of problem:
Sometimes, when using a native font stack in CSS on a web page, fonts that are
not in the font stack at all are substituted for the desired fonts.
This only seems to affect web pages viewed using:
- Fedora (not Ubuntu, Debian 11, or Manjaro)
- Firefox (not Chrome or Chromium)
- When using the RPM version or Mozilla's official build from their website
(not the Flatpak)
Happens in the stable version of Firefox, Firefox Beta, and Firefox nightly.
Two substitutions I've identified so far:
- Droid Sans is substituted for Open Sans
- P052 is substituted for 'URW Palladio L' or Palatino
Substituting for Palatino may be less objectionable, since that's a generic
choice, but URW Palladio L is rather specific and it's surprising to see the
substitution. This also wouldn't be as objectionable if the font substitutions
were better. Droid Sans doesn't look much like Open Sans at all, and P052 looks
really ugly (it has unevenly sized letters). In Firefox Flatpak, it instead
substitutes the better-looking 'TeX Gyre Pagella', and only does that for
Palatino, not for 'URW Palladio L' (which was higher priority in my font
stack). This is more desirable behavior.
The source of the problem seems to be that if you run the following command:
fc-match :family="Open Sans"
It returns Droid Sans.
Possibly related bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820166
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1406790
How reproducible:
Consistently
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open a clean Fedora 35 install, and verify that Open Sans is not installed.
2. Create the following web page and view it in a browser:
```
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title></title>
<style>
h1,h2,h3,h4 {
font-family: Open Sans, Fira Sans;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Hello World</h1>
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
</body>
</html>
```
Alternately, view a real live (but more complex) website at
https://www.maximumethics.dev/
Actual results:
Notice that the text on the webpage is displayed in Droid Sans, not Open Sans.
Expected results:
The webpage displays the next available font in the font stack, Fira Sans in
this case, or the browser's default font if you don't have Fira Sans.
--- Additional comment from Akira TAGOH on 2022-03-30 09:26:08 UTC ---
Well, maybe good to file a separate bug to object each substitutions.
For Open Sans, google-droid-sans-fonts has the following config:
<alias binding="same">
<family>Open Sans</family>
<accept>
<family>Droid Sans</family>
</accept>
</alias>
This is the reason why you see that behavior.
For URW Palladio L, urw-base35-fonts-common has the following config:
<alias binding="same">
<family>URW Palladio L</family>
<accept>
<family>P052</family>
</accept>
</alias>
And finally for Palatino, it is in urw-base35-p052-fonts:
<alias binding="same">
<family>Palatino</family>
<accept>
<family>P052</family>
</accept>
</alias>
Although those urw config are coming from upstream. so if you have any
objections for them, it would be good to talk with URW upstream.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062386
[Bug 2062386] strange font priorities in Firefox
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096153
4 months, 2 weeks
[Bug 2184872] New: User installed Japanese fonts override system
fonts when substituting glyphs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184872
Bug ID: 2184872
Summary: User installed Japanese fonts override system fonts
when substituting glyphs
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bztdlinux(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When installing a Japanese font locally (using gnome font viewer, which
effectively copies to ~/.local/share/fonts/), with the default fontconfig, all
kana in the system uses that font.
However, it only affects certain applications. Firefox (rpm) and Inkscape
(flatpak) is affected, but gwrite is not.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.14.0-3.fc37.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download the following font:
http://font.sumomo.ne.jp/fontdata-c2157415/k-font.zip
2. Unzip and install by double-clicking the font in nautilus and clicking
install.
3. Restart Firefox or Inkscape and paste "です” in a field with sans-serif or
system-ui font
Actual results:
Text appears with the new font
Expected results:
Text appears with the normal system font
Additional info:
Running pango-view, e.g. the following, works fine and selects a reasonable
font (Droid Sans Japanese):
FC_DEBUG=4 pango-view --font="system-ui" -t です | grep family
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184872
4 months, 3 weeks